Any real bennys in advancing the timing??
#17
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: S.Jersey
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I will need proof.
#18
☠ CF Sheriff ☠
also why programmers don't work on our trucks. Again...well documented...
#20
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: S.Jersey
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Actually no I didn't. So no one has ever had any dyno proven gains with head work etc and a programmer? So what its buyer beware. All the claims are false? Help me understand. Not trying to be smart, I really want to know. I pride myself on being a decent mech. Allbeit mustangs and vettes. I do my own work. So I'm always ready to learn something new. Even when it means appologizing for being wrong. Wich. It appears I am.lol. so I'm sorry.lol.
Also. I don't partake in someone callingsomething a myth just because they say it is. I need dyno proof. There willbe a lot of people who will have some false advertising lawsuits.lol
Also. I don't partake in someone callingsomething a myth just because they say it is. I need dyno proof. There willbe a lot of people who will have some false advertising lawsuits.lol
Last edited by OEJ; 12-17-2011 at 07:59 PM.
#21
CF Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bakersfield CA
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
degreeing the cam will help, your changing the timing at the source. hydraulic lifters and mech. lifters only do what the cam tells them to do. If the cam lobes are not where the PCM thinks they are wala more power (if you did it right). and without changing the cam you could throw in a set of rhoads lifters and POW same cam acts like a big cam, or a set of adjustable pushrods (but that's way more time consuming) the CPS is not going to be able to tell where the cam is in relation to the crank, and the distributor won't know the cam has been moved cause it can only go in one way.
#26
CF Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Republic of TEXAS
Posts: 8,172
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Actually no I didn't. So no one has ever had any dyno proven gains with head work etc and a programmer? So what its buyer beware. All the claims are false? Help me understand. Not trying to be smart, I really want to know. I pride myself on being a decent mech. Allbeit mustangs and vettes. I do my own work. So I'm always ready to learn something new. Even when it means appologizing for being wrong. Wich. It appears I am.lol. so I'm sorry.lol.
Also. I don't partake in someone callingsomething a myth just because they say it is. I need dyno proof. There willbe a lot of people who will have some false advertising lawsuits.lol
Also. I don't partake in someone callingsomething a myth just because they say it is. I need dyno proof. There willbe a lot of people who will have some false advertising lawsuits.lol
The XJ cam has such a minimal lift that it appears in that pic only 2 valves are on lift.
Last edited by djb383; 12-17-2011 at 09:10 PM.
#27
☠ CF Sheriff ☠
lol @ false advertising lawsuits. Just like the "electric turbos" and the "Tornado" i guess huh?
#29
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: S.Jersey
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
#30
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: The venerable 4.0
Originally Posted by djb383
Those don't work???????????? LOL