CA smog fail 5 times.... running out of ideas
#1
CA smog fail 5 times.... running out of ideas
Hey everyone!
Recently picked up a 93 Jeep Cherokee Country with a 4.0. I failed CA smog on Nox at 15mph and everything else passed with flying colors going in with no knowledge on the vehicles past and the smog tech told me I needed a new o2 sensor. Changed it and came back to fail again on Nox. Since then, I have smogged a total of 4 more times and changed the following parts: o2 sensor, carb legal cat, Coolant Temp Sensor, MAP sensor, map sensor vacuum line, Fuel Filter, Oil, Muffler for back pressure, 165 degree thermostat(will be changing back to 195 thought it could help cool), champion spark plugs, rotor + distributor cap. I also wired the e-fan to a switch and ran it during the test.
To my understanding, the 93 xj does not have an egr.
One of my last ideas would be the charcoal canister. Do you think it could affect Nox? I have not looked too much into it, but its one of the last emissions control devices that i haven't touched.
Here is the Results of the last smog test.
here is some pictures of my engine bay to see if anyone can see anything off about it.
I appreciate all the help in advance ! Thank you!
Recently picked up a 93 Jeep Cherokee Country with a 4.0. I failed CA smog on Nox at 15mph and everything else passed with flying colors going in with no knowledge on the vehicles past and the smog tech told me I needed a new o2 sensor. Changed it and came back to fail again on Nox. Since then, I have smogged a total of 4 more times and changed the following parts: o2 sensor, carb legal cat, Coolant Temp Sensor, MAP sensor, map sensor vacuum line, Fuel Filter, Oil, Muffler for back pressure, 165 degree thermostat(will be changing back to 195 thought it could help cool), champion spark plugs, rotor + distributor cap. I also wired the e-fan to a switch and ran it during the test.
To my understanding, the 93 xj does not have an egr.
One of my last ideas would be the charcoal canister. Do you think it could affect Nox? I have not looked too much into it, but its one of the last emissions control devices that i haven't touched.
Here is the Results of the last smog test.
here is some pictures of my engine bay to see if anyone can see anything off about it.
I appreciate all the help in advance ! Thank you!
#2
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 91
From: Syracuse, NY
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L
First item of concern is mixture. Which can be observed via the voltage signal generated by the O2 sensor(s). Though a typical multimeter probably won't be sufficient (because it takes periodic samples and averages them). Do you know anyone with a digital oscilloscope? Like a HAM radio hobbyist?
Are those after-market injectors? Has the vehicle ever passed emissions since those were installed?
Have you performed any carbon build-up cleaning?
Has your fuel pressure been tested to ensure that it is within spec both at idle and under load? (I ask because the RPM was similar in both tests, but the 15mph would have been under far less load).
Are those after-market injectors? Has the vehicle ever passed emissions since those were installed?
Have you performed any carbon build-up cleaning?
Has your fuel pressure been tested to ensure that it is within spec both at idle and under load? (I ask because the RPM was similar in both tests, but the 15mph would have been under far less load).
#3
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 957
From: Lost in the wilds of Virginia
Year: 1998 Classic (I'll get it running soon....) and 02 Grand
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Could be a vacuum leak somewhere, but that will have you running rich. Not sure that would bother the NOx reading. What do you know about the condition of your injectors? One of our old timers swears by BK44 as the only injector cleaner that actually works. Wouldn't hurt to give it a shot.
Off topic: That's a pretty clean 93 you have there! By the way, you can lose the heater control valve. Just run 5/8" heater hose and 3/4" *heater hose and cap the vacuum lines, and say goodbye to that troublesome waste of space.
*I don't recall which one is top and which is bottom, but it's easy to tell when you are looking at them.
Off topic: That's a pretty clean 93 you have there! By the way, you can lose the heater control valve. Just run 5/8" heater hose and 3/4" *heater hose and cap the vacuum lines, and say goodbye to that troublesome waste of space.
*I don't recall which one is top and which is bottom, but it's easy to tell when you are looking at them.
#4
Could be a vacuum leak somewhere, but that will have you running rich. Not sure that would bother the NOx reading. What do you know about the condition of your injectors? One of our old timers swears by BK44 as the only injector cleaner that actually works. Wouldn't hurt to give it a shot.
Off topic: That's a pretty clean 93 you have there! By the way, you can lose the heater control valve. Just run 5/8" heater hose and 3/4" *heater hose and cap the vacuum lines, and say goodbye to that troublesome waste of space.
*I don't recall which one is top and which is bottom, but it's easy to tell when you are looking at them.
Off topic: That's a pretty clean 93 you have there! By the way, you can lose the heater control valve. Just run 5/8" heater hose and 3/4" *heater hose and cap the vacuum lines, and say goodbye to that troublesome waste of space.
*I don't recall which one is top and which is bottom, but it's easy to tell when you are looking at them.
#5
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,588
Likes: 494
From: Chico, CA
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.3L with headers and full 3" exhaust system
NOX is a sign of high combustion temps. I would suggest using some sea foam in a quarter tank of gas and driving it until almost empty. You might have carbon build up making hot spots inside the combustion chamber
#6
Take this post (mine) with a pound of salt - as I have no idea what I am talking about.
But - at some point - maybe 15 years ago - some wizard (in Florida) thought our engine needed these rather thick (thicker than simple foil) aluminum covering the top of the engine, almost wrapping each of the plugs.
It has stayed there since. It must have had something to do with temperature disbursement,
We have never failed an inspection since.
But - at some point - maybe 15 years ago - some wizard (in Florida) thought our engine needed these rather thick (thicker than simple foil) aluminum covering the top of the engine, almost wrapping each of the plugs.
It has stayed there since. It must have had something to do with temperature disbursement,
We have never failed an inspection since.
#7
CF Veteran
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 153
From: Northern CT
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Turbo 4.0
My 95 passes CT emission standards without a cat but I get the tank down to a very low level and pour in about 3 bottles of isopropyl alcohol. I dont know how your limits vary from here. After the test I fill the tank and drive it for the next few days till empty. Might be worth a try.
Trending Topics
#8
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 957
From: Lost in the wilds of Virginia
Year: 1998 Classic (I'll get it running soon....) and 02 Grand
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
#10
My 95 passes CT emission standards without a cat but I get the tank down to a very low level and pour in about 3 bottles of isopropyl alcohol. I dont know how your limits vary from here. After the test I fill the tank and drive it for the next few days till empty. Might be worth a try.
#11
First item of concern is mixture. Which can be observed via the voltage signal generated by the O2 sensor(s). Though a typical multimeter probably won't be sufficient (because it takes periodic samples and averages them). Do you know anyone with a digital oscilloscope? Like a HAM radio hobbyist?
Are those after-market injectors? Has the vehicle ever passed emissions since those were installed?
Have you performed any carbon build-up cleaning?
Has your fuel pressure been tested to ensure that it is within spec both at idle and under load? (I ask because the RPM was similar in both tests, but the 15mph would have been under far less load).
Are those after-market injectors? Has the vehicle ever passed emissions since those were installed?
Have you performed any carbon build-up cleaning?
Has your fuel pressure been tested to ensure that it is within spec both at idle and under load? (I ask because the RPM was similar in both tests, but the 15mph would have been under far less load).
Thank you so much!!
#12
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,588
Likes: 494
From: Chico, CA
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.3L with headers and full 3" exhaust system
Did you pour it down the intake after you replaced the cat? That process can knock out a cat. Just putting it in the gas tank is preferable
#13
yes it was after I replaced the cat. The only issue is the car doesn't have a license plate and isn't registered so i'm trying to stay away driving the streets, as I could get in a lot of trouble lol.
#14
CF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 278
From: Santa Clarita California
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L
Is you jeep stock with stock size tires ? because if you have larger tires it will lower your rpm and at 15mph that can lug the engine with the 50% load ,
#15
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cammykool
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
82
08-24-2017 04:07 PM
bufbarnaby
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
2
07-27-2014 10:17 AM
stew
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
26
02-23-2014 06:46 PM
je4reyk
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
33
10-03-2011 11:16 AM
XJ30188
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
6
05-23-2010 05:28 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)