dana 44

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-24-2009 | 08:23 PM

#16

XJ Stryker

CF Veteran

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 7,661

Likes: 14

From: Smiths Station, Al

Year: 87

Model: Wagoneer

Engine: 4.0 I6

What ever dude, You are already gonna be full width might as well DO IT RIGHT.

Each one of them said that they wasted the time and money on the 44 I will learn from there YEARS of experience if I go BIG.

If you need references the names are from NAXJA

LessLimited, Brianho13, and a member here also Macgyver.

Reply Like

06-24-2009 | 09:40 PM

#17

RDK_YJ88

Member

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 225

Likes: 0

From: Linden, MI

Year: 2000

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by XJ Stryker

Well, if I'm gonna DO IT RIGHT then i might as well go rockwells then, right? Because why waste money on a dana 60 if im just gonna break it.

Reply Like

06-25-2009 | 10:22 AM

#18

01LimitedXJ

Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 688

Likes: 1

From: Nashville, TN

Year: 2000

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0L HO

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd4x426

it really depends on what size tire you are running just because the dana 60 is bigger and stronger doesnt meen its better you are looking at extra weight and a significant difference in price for not only the axle but parts also if you arent planning on going over 35s the dana 44 is hard to beat they will take a hell of alot of abuse and have tons of aftermarket support if you plan on going bigger then 35s though you may want to look into a D60

i agree, max tire size is a contributing factor here. i currently have no plan to go above 33's in my xj...so im good with my 30/8.8.

the weight isnt a factor, it is unsprung weight and just adds to your traction. i would say ground clearance becomes a problem when you arent running a very large tire (under 37/38). 44's can be built up very strong, but if you think you will go bigger later...why waste the money? i'd say make a plan and stick with it.