Duel Exhaust questions
#31
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
than that'd be your best bet: run it through one flowmaster (since you already have a 40 on there anyways) and y-pipe it out the back, and throw some chrome tips on for style
really, your only main concern at this point then would be to figure a good spot for a hanger on the driver side and a good way to route it through there without hitting anything.
really, your only main concern at this point then would be to figure a good spot for a hanger on the driver side and a good way to route it through there without hitting anything.
ONE MORE QUESTION. would it be better to buy a header that has all six cylinders connected or one that is 3 pipes and an out and 3 pipes and an out? so dual outlets for header or one outlet?
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2008
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 3.0L CRD
yeah, i'll take it to a exhaust shop and see if it can be done with enough room to spare.
ONE MORE QUESTION. would it be better to buy a header that has all six cylinders connected or one that is 3 pipes and an out and 3 pipes and an out? so dual outlets for header or one outlet?
ONE MORE QUESTION. would it be better to buy a header that has all six cylinders connected or one that is 3 pipes and an out and 3 pipes and an out? so dual outlets for header or one outlet?
#34
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
depends. if you ran a header that has all 6 combine into one y-collector, then running one pipe to your muffler and then splitting it out the back is the easiest. running a header with dual collectors (the 3-out and 3-out as you stated) makes it easier if you want to run two separate cats and mufflers, kinda like the E30 Bimmers some of the guys were talking about earlier. usually you have to spend more in the install because you then basically are running two set ups out the back, even though these do typically get you a little more power. most of the headers i have seen like this though for jeeps have some type of y-pipe that recollects them back into one outlet, but you can opt out on that when you install it. for cost effectiveness in the short run would be a header with one outlet on the collector, and then y-pipe it after the muffler, just keeps material cost down. pipes are cheap, but the cats and mufflers will leave your wallet a little on the light side.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2008
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 3.0L CRD
naw, we understand perfectly.
but yeah, basically that's it in a nutshell. like i said, we are not making really enough power to need to run two pipes off the manifold back, and one pipe split after the muffler is cost effective. if the header you are ordering comes with a collection pipe running it from two to one outlet, you are already figuring that into your cost anyways. but, say, you wanted to drop a stroker into it later on in the jeeps life, running dual might not be a bad idea, and having that manifold would have you one step ahead of the game.
but yeah, basically that's it in a nutshell. like i said, we are not making really enough power to need to run two pipes off the manifold back, and one pipe split after the muffler is cost effective. if the header you are ordering comes with a collection pipe running it from two to one outlet, you are already figuring that into your cost anyways. but, say, you wanted to drop a stroker into it later on in the jeeps life, running dual might not be a bad idea, and having that manifold would have you one step ahead of the game.
#36
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
i think im going to just do what u said earlier, get the APN header, and y pipe it after my muffler. i'll see what the exhaust shop says about running exhaust on on both sides and see how much its going to cost me.
would i have a different tone with y piping it after the muffler?
would i have a different tone with y piping it after the muffler?
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Levittown P.A.
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L H/O
ya know, i had a straight pipe (just cat) for about a week. wasnt that loud. i was quite dissapointed. i cut out the stock muffler and put in flex pipe untill i got out and bought a cherrybomb glasspack. i still love the glasspack.
#38
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area California
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Clifford makes a split manifold for the 6 and claims 18-20% increase in HP.
http://www.cliffordperformance.net/M...gory_Code=J258
http://www.cliffordperformance.net/M...gory_Code=J258
#39
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walton, Indiana
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I'd love to see some dyno #s before and after you do the duals. My money is on you actually losing power. Or at least you'll lose it down in the usuable power range & possibly pick it high in the RPMs. An engine is an air pump.. if the head isn't passing enough air to necessitate a freer flowing exhaust system, why do it? If you just want the dual exhaust look then just mount a second tip on the driver's side.
#40
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: smyrna,de
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
#41
CF Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 1991
Engine: 4.0 I-6 H.O.
I have seen a double tri-Y set up on I-6's
But I think on an XJ you would have some scavenging problems at the collector if you split the manifold into a dual tri-y set up, you cant compare all I-6s and call it a day, because you have to consider timing and how the cylinders fire order and how the exhaust is routed
the collector should be seeing a pretty steady flow of exhaust gases so you dont get any backflow up one of the exhaust runners, which would cause a major power loss and back-pressure issue
that is why "tuned" headers are so much more expensive, because somebody paid alot of money to a engineer who did the gas dynamics and flow to equalize the exhaust pulses at the collector by changing runner length and shape to increase scavenging and flow
But I think on an XJ you would have some scavenging problems at the collector if you split the manifold into a dual tri-y set up, you cant compare all I-6s and call it a day, because you have to consider timing and how the cylinders fire order and how the exhaust is routed
the collector should be seeing a pretty steady flow of exhaust gases so you dont get any backflow up one of the exhaust runners, which would cause a major power loss and back-pressure issue
that is why "tuned" headers are so much more expensive, because somebody paid alot of money to a engineer who did the gas dynamics and flow to equalize the exhaust pulses at the collector by changing runner length and shape to increase scavenging and flow
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2008
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 3.0L CRD
i think im going to just do what u said earlier, get the APN header, and y pipe it after my muffler. i'll see what the exhaust shop says about running exhaust on on both sides and see how much its going to cost me.
would i have a different tone with y piping it after the muffler?
would i have a different tone with y piping it after the muffler?
#43
CF Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: corpus christi, texas
Posts: 2,004
Received 40 Likes
on
35 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 I6
for some reason, chrysler split the factory manifold into two-three exit so they must have done some testing, right? that is another reason why i figure you guys would be fine with dual mani set up.
#44
CF Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 1991
Engine: 4.0 I-6 H.O.
not necessarily, it could have been just easier to manufacture that way instead of having a giant collector that has 6 pipe inputs
As far as performance gains look at my post above, scavenging is the reason guys with V-8s get h or x pipes installed, to balance exhaust pulses and improve scavenging, you never want stagnant exhaust gas in the pipe
#45
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
Clifford makes a split manifold for the 6 and claims 18-20% increase in HP.
http://www.cliffordperformance.net/M...gory_Code=J258
http://www.cliffordperformance.net/M...gory_Code=J258
I'd love to see some dyno #s before and after you do the duals. My money is on you actually losing power. Or at least you'll lose it down in the usuable power range & possibly pick it high in the RPMs. An engine is an air pump.. if the head isn't passing enough air to necessitate a freer flowing exhaust system, why do it? If you just want the dual exhaust look then just mount a second tip on the driver's side.
Last edited by Metlic53; 03-02-2010 at 12:53 PM.