Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

Exhaust Debate!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2012 | 01:44 AM
  #1  
cherokee90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: austin texas
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default Exhaust Debate!

Quick question for all you guys. I read on this site all the time about how you should not remove the cat because you need the back pressure... But then i also read all the time that the bend in the exhaust right after the manifold to clear the front drive shaft is killing everyone's performance. So if you did remove the cat would the bend not supply enough back pressure??? Or if you remove the bend and leave the cat would you have enough back pressure??? Just confused on how the two are different
Old 03-24-2012 | 02:17 AM
  #2  
DFlintstone's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 19
From: Nor-Cal Coast
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
Default

I don't think the bend restricts it much. As far as back pressure from the cat, with companies striving/competing to achieve better performance and mileage #'s, I would think they would just make it a little bigger if there was a problem. Course I don't "winde out" my 4.0 hitting the power band!
Old 03-24-2012 | 08:19 AM
  #3  
weebur's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 247
Likes: 2
From: Northern Illinois
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by cherokee90
Quick question for all you guys. I read on this site all the time about how you should not remove the cat because you need the back pressure... But then i also read all the time that the bend in the exhaust right after the manifold to clear the front drive shaft is killing everyone's performance. So if you did remove the cat would the bend not supply enough back pressure??? Or if you remove the bend and leave the cat would you have enough back pressure??? Just confused on how the two are different
I think that an engine "needing back pressure" is a myth. Why would there be a billion dollar industry dedicated to reducing back pressure (free flowing headers/cats/mufflers)? If I'm wrong please show me your reliable source.
Old 03-24-2012 | 08:29 AM
  #4  
cruiser54's Avatar
::CF Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,566
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by DFlintstone
I don't think the bend restricts it much. As far as back pressure from the cat, with companies striving/competing to achieve better performance and mileage #'s, I would think they would just make it a little bigger if there was a problem. Course I don't "winde out" my 4.0 hitting the power band!
Seat of the pants difference with a modded headpipe. More than converter delete IMHO. That crush in the headpipe looks to reduce the volume by about 30 to 40%.
Old 03-24-2012 | 08:40 AM
  #5  
caged's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,874
Likes: 98
From: Northern Ontario, Canada
Year: 1990, 1999, 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

the reason there is high flow exhausts, is to match the added intake if modded.

so in short, if you increase the intake, you have to increase the exhaust.

only opening one and not the other won't do much in the end.
Old 03-24-2012 | 08:46 AM
  #6  
cruiser54's Avatar
::CF Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,566
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by caged
the reason there is high flow exhausts, is to match the added intake if modded.

so in short, if you increase the intake, you have to increase the exhaust.

only opening one and not the other won't do much in the end.
I'll have to disagree in this case based on my experience. On both my MJ and XJ, I had the downpipe replaced with ones that were bent to clear the driveshaft by a muffler shop. Noticeable difference.

Later on, added 60mm throttle bodies on both from www.strokedjeep.com. Another noticeable difference.

While only a high flow muffler may add little in performance or almost unnoticeable gains, removal of the "crush" in the downpipe is a worthwhile mod. Take a look at how restrictive it is sometime.
Old 03-24-2012 | 09:31 AM
  #7  
caged's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,874
Likes: 98
From: Northern Ontario, Canada
Year: 1990, 1999, 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by cruiser54
I'll have to disagree in this case based on my experience. On both my MJ and XJ, I had the downpipe replaced with ones that were bent to clear the driveshaft by a muffler shop. Noticeable difference.

Later on, added 60mm throttle bodies on both from www.strokedjeep.com. Another noticeable difference.

While only a high flow muffler may add little in performance or almost unnoticeable gains, removal of the "crush" in the downpipe is a worthwhile mod. Take a look at how restrictive it is sometime.
ok
Old 03-24-2012 | 09:38 AM
  #8  
'Manche's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

The engine does need some back pressure, however prolly not as much as factory.. Hate to say it, but those engineers that make all that money to design stuff actually make things purposeful in vehicles (although not always in the most idea ways).
Old 03-24-2012 | 09:43 AM
  #9  
cruiser54's Avatar
::CF Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,566
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by 'Manche
The engine does need some back pressure, however prolly not as much as factory.. Hate to say it, but those engineers that make all that money to design stuff actually make things purposeful in vehicles (although not always in the most idea ways).
Yes they do. Like adding a crush in the downpipe as a band-aid to promote the cat heating up faster, while making it appear that it was necessary for driveshaft clearance..
Old 03-24-2012 | 10:34 AM
  #10  
kissthis66's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 720
Likes: 1
From: Marshall, WI
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L i6
Default

Originally Posted by weebur
I think that an engine "needing back pressure" is a myth. Why would there be a billion dollar industry dedicated to reducing back pressure (free flowing headers/cats/mufflers)? If I'm wrong please show me your reliable source.
Engines need back pressure, unless your running a big cam. Perfect example is my '66 Chevelle Malibu. I would run around on weekends with open headers, it killed the performance of the motor but it sounded mean as hell. But when I would run the exhaust (dual flow masters, no cats, x pipe) it would kill at the tracks(12.13 best time). Back pressure is no myth, it's needed for small cams. The motor will run with no back pressure , it's just you will lose tremendous amounts of power unless you got a big 'ol loppy cam in it. Don't believe me, unhook your exhaust and take it around the block. I bet you see a big differance. As far as companies out there , they make high performance exhausts for everyone from daily drivers to get a little more horsepower to drag strip cars who need open headers cause the exhaust restricts the motor. If back pressure is a myth go ahead and put 6" exhaust on your XJ and let us know how it goes...do your homework kid... better to not say anything and appear not to be dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Old 03-24-2012 | 11:10 AM
  #11  
cruiser54's Avatar
::CF Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,566
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Can't wait for 5-90's response............
Old 03-24-2012 | 12:45 PM
  #12  
hankthetank's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

This was recently covered in another thread. It's already been proven that no, naturally aspired motors don't need back pressure. It's all about flow control and velocity. Google backpressure myths, you'll see.
Old 03-24-2012 | 02:19 PM
  #13  
djb383's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,172
Likes: 17
From: The Republic of TEXAS
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by cherokee90
Quick question for all you guys. I read on this site all the time about how you should not remove the cat because you need the back pressure... But then i also read all the time that the bend in the exhaust right after the manifold to clear the front drive shaft is killing everyone's performance. So if you did remove the cat would the bend not supply enough back pressure??? Or if you remove the bend and leave the cat would you have enough back pressure??? Just confused on how the two are different
Google "back pressure myths" and get WAY MORE FACTS than opinions.....there's just too many Ronnie Racers out there confusing fact with fiction. A IC motor is an air pump, the better the in/out, the more efficient.....but there's got to be some compromise with a DD streetable/legal ride. It doesn't need a cork in either end, but straight pipes do get a little annoying. LOL
Old 03-25-2012 | 08:57 AM
  #14  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

Discussion of removal or alteration of the catalytic converter is strictly prohibited on tiss forum.

Read the rules.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmsummers2012
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
55
08-21-2024 06:22 PM
libengan
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
14
11-06-2015 10:16 AM
MightyMouse8
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
14
10-08-2015 09:57 AM
Crimmy
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
10-01-2015 07:43 PM
shadowmoses
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
6
09-30-2015 02:34 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.