Fuel injector application question
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1987
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Fuel injector application question
I have a 1987 4.0l Renix. Thought I was buying 703 injectors, but received 746's (0280155746). 125,000 miles, stock intake and engine, nothing fancy. Just looking for better idle, a little pep, and maybe mileage...
Will these injectors work?
Thanks!!
Will these injectors work?
Thanks!!
#2
http://fuelinjectorconnection.com/sh...?productid=276
if so this is a 19lb/hr injector which is correct for your application. the 703s are too large for a pre 91 cherokee. i know guys have used them but their proper fit is 91-95 which they flow nearly identical to. {i have read, still waiting to do an actual flow test on one and or find hard data of someone who has done one, bosch oddly rates them at 16.75lb/hr however all the tests i have read about show roughly 21.5lb/hr@40psi}
i'm not so sure about their advice on working 87-95, 87-90 would be more like it. the 91-95 cherokee used a 21lb injector at 39psi. where as 87-90 is 18.6lb/hr
one of the better injector threads i have came across is http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f13/d...36/index5.html
Last edited by racebum; 08-13-2012 at 11:44 PM.
#3
CF Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1987 Comanche,1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Renix
703s dont increase gas mileage, only idle. The only reason it might have increased you mileage is your previous injectors were dirty.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1987
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
is it this injector?
http://fuelinjectorconnection.com/sh...?productid=276
if so this is a 19lb/hr injector which is correct for your application.
one of the better injector threads i have came across is http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f13/d...36/index5.html
http://fuelinjectorconnection.com/sh...?productid=276
if so this is a 19lb/hr injector which is correct for your application.
one of the better injector threads i have came across is http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f13/d...36/index5.html
thanks for the advice!
If they are not the right ones, what kind of symptoms should we look for?
#5
Herp Derp Jerp
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Parham, ON
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Originally Posted by lvcherokee
That fuelinjectorconnection.com site sure looks like the one I bought, and they are listed at 19lb/hr, so I will give them a shot.
thanks for the advice!
If they are not the right ones, what kind of symptoms should we look for?
#6
CF Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Nor-Cal Coast
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
The 703's flow a little more, but when it's warmed up the 02 sensor "trims" it to the proper mix. People pass smog with them in their Renix Jeeps. Jeep runs great, fantastic throttle response and nice idle. My thinking though is there is a problem....while it's cold, before the 02 does it's magic the ECU uses a "default pulse width", for 18.6 Lbs/Hr. The 703's being higher makes it run rich, get crap mileage there, AND take a little longer to warm up being so rich. That's my thinking anyway. I'm looking to sell my, (8), (got 2 extra), 703's and go to 4 hole 18-19# injectors for my Renix.
Oh Ha! I now recognize from the search results you are the same guy from last week. Yea. Volvo injectors. The only reference I found was 23-24 Lbs/hr. I'm not sure that's correct though.
Oh Ha! I now recognize from the search results you are the same guy from last week. Yea. Volvo injectors. The only reference I found was 23-24 Lbs/hr. I'm not sure that's correct though.
Last edited by DFlintstone; 08-17-2012 at 12:59 AM.
#7
correct, warm at part throttle the 703s will function properly in this application. it's when cold and at WOT when the ecu is either at open loop or switches there during heavy throttle that you go to a fixed map and the ecu ignores the o2. this is bad for a few reasons.
1. you use more fuel
2. you're down on hp being too rich
3. you burn out your cat with excess gas in the exhaust
4. potential for ringwash
5. potential for deposits on exhaust valves and spark plugs
there are some pretty slick deals on 19lb injectors listed on ebay right now
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ford-Motorsp...#ht_994wt_1163
is one example
if i could find a cheap adj fuel pressure regulator {that works} for my 94 i would use these too
1. you use more fuel
2. you're down on hp being too rich
3. you burn out your cat with excess gas in the exhaust
4. potential for ringwash
5. potential for deposits on exhaust valves and spark plugs
there are some pretty slick deals on 19lb injectors listed on ebay right now
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ford-Motorsp...#ht_994wt_1163
is one example
if i could find a cheap adj fuel pressure regulator {that works} for my 94 i would use these too
Last edited by racebum; 08-17-2012 at 11:46 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
CF Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Nor-Cal Coast
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
Good point ^^, I hadn't even thought of WOT...not that I go over 70/80% often.
Your right! ^^$50...I ended up spending more, (a tad) on my 703's at the JY!
Your right! ^^$50...I ended up spending more, (a tad) on my 703's at the JY!
Last edited by DFlintstone; 08-17-2012 at 12:52 PM.
#9
CF Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Nor-Cal Coast
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
Idk...I'm just learning here myself. I think they went to the higher pressure partly to shoot for better atomization. Also there is less chance the fuel is gonna boil at the higher pressure. Assuming the 92 uses the higher rate I wonder if 703's might be a good match for you. I'm not going to look into those details until I get my OWN straight!
#10
Idk...I'm just learning here myself. I think they went to the higher pressure partly to shoot for better atomization. Also there is less chance the fuel is gonna boil at the higher pressure. Assuming the 92 uses the higher rate I wonder if 703's might be a good match for you. I'm not going to look into those details until I get my OWN straight!
you know what, you just made me think about something. if i swiped a late 49psi fuel rail i could use 19lb injectors as they would be right at 21.3lb/hr@49psi and i would have the benefits of higher pressure
i can't remember when the 49psi started but it was either 96 or a year or two after. right in the start of the obd2 days. i know there's a chart somewhere online
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1987
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
There's some stuff here> http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/tech_specs.html
the 746's sound like they will do the trick, will give 'em a shot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
riderjay253
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
4
09-16-2015 11:31 AM
australian_expat
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
4
09-02-2015 09:02 PM
Jicki Rough
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
1
09-02-2015 09:36 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)