Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

no brake lights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2019, 06:27 AM
  #16  
CF Veteran
 
Dave51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,285
Received 372 Likes on 332 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by boxburn
Under load meaning the circuit has a power draw and is under load. When checking for voltages at a connector you can easily find +12v but if you pull a current draw through it, it can drop to 0V.

I recently traced fault with tow wiring which had me stumped. At the relay I was reading +12v so at the time I thought the power source was good. It turned out that when you tried to pull power through the relay to power the tow lighting, everything died. In the end there was a bad connector under the van which had corroded causing the issues. The point being, under no load you can get false readings with a multimeter as they can't always show a true reading of a circuit under load. Had I of used my test light, I would have found the issue much quicker.

Hopefully that makes sense, it's 1:26am and I'm off.
Sorry, somebody must have hit me with the Stupid Stick so I'm not understanding your scenario. How would a test light have made things easier? If you had +12V at the power source then isn't the power source, by definition good (unless you mean your B+ is about 13.8V so then yeah you have a drain at source). And if everything dies when you apply power, the focus isn't looking for behavior "under load", it's looking for "shorts", and you shouldn't be looking for, or testing with, B+ power, but rather resistance (with a multimeter).

I do not understand how a test lamp would be preferred over a multimeter when testing under load. For instance, when looking at my headlight circuit to see if I would benefit by hooking them up to B+ I found a 2.4V drop "under load". That seemed more diagnostic to me, and just as quick as using a test light, and saying "yeah the lamp looks a little dimmer so that must be it".
Old 06-30-2019, 06:31 AM
  #17  
CF Veteran
 
Dave51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,285
Received 372 Likes on 332 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by awg
for 12V auto electrical, (not electronic), I just find it faster and more certain to start with a test light when searching for 12V+
I will concede "faster" in that specific scenario, namely looking for the presence or absence of B+.
Old 06-30-2019, 12:47 PM
  #18  
CF Veteran
 
boxburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,577
Received 278 Likes on 242 Posts
Year: 1995 RHD
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0l
Default

Originally Posted by Dave51
If you had +12V at the power source then isn't the power source, by definition good (unless you mean your B+ is about 13.8V so then yeah you have a drain at source).And if everything dies when you apply power, the focus isn't looking for behavior "under load", it's looking for "shorts", and you shouldn't be looking for, or testing with, B+ power, but rather resistance (with a multimeter).

I do not understand how a test lamp would be preferred over a multimeter when testing under load. For instance, when looking at my headlight circuit to see if I would benefit by hooking them up to B+ I found a 2.4V drop "under load". That seemed more diagnostic to me, and just as quick as using a test light, and saying "yeah the lamp looks a little dimmer so that must be it".
In the scenario you described of finding a 2.4v drop, that is the perfect place to use a multimeter as the bulbs work to begin with and you are trying to measure the drop specifically. If the bulb isn't working to begin with due to a very high resistance on say a corroded connector, a test lamp would not illuminate whereas a multimeter could still read +12v. In my previous example, the corroded connector had nearly 1M Ohms resistance but when under no load, the other end to the relay read +12v. Had I used the test lamp, it would have stayed off.

Really it's just another testing method that can help towards the common goal of diagnosing an issue.
Old 06-30-2019, 02:48 PM
  #19  
CF Veteran
 
Dave51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,285
Received 372 Likes on 332 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by boxburn
In the scenario you described of finding a 2.4v drop, that is the perfect place to use a multimeter as the bulbs work to begin with and you are trying to measure the drop specifically. If the bulb isn't working to begin with due to a very high resistance on say a corroded connector, a test lamp would not illuminate whereas a multimeter could still read +12v. In my previous example, the corroded connector had nearly 1M Ohms resistance but when under no load, the other end to the relay read +12v. Had I used the test lamp, it would have stayed off.
So you used a multimeter to identify the issue (although I'd like to think I could look at a connector with 1MΩ resistance and pretty much come to the conclusion that I need a new connector)?

That said, your example is the perfect indication for load testing and failure of the test lamp. If you put a test lamp there and get no power you are immediately sent down the wrong path (there's no power). If you measure B+ but a known good bulb (which you can confirm with a... multimeter) will not light, go to load testing and you'll start at the right end (connector, then wire).

But again, if you're looking at a corroded connector, you just gotta change that out.
Old 06-30-2019, 03:20 PM
  #20  
CF Veteran
 
boxburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,577
Received 278 Likes on 242 Posts
Year: 1995 RHD
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0l
Default

I like to think it's worth using both bits of kit in certain situations but that's just me. It turned out that the connector in question shouldn't have even been there, another reason why it took a while to find. It should have been a straight wire with fuse from the front of the van to the rear but instead, there was a scotchlok connector joining 2 wires above the fuel tank giving the resistance. The end result was just a new wire front to back and problem solved.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
investinwaffles
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
6
08-29-2017 01:53 PM
gthbryce
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
4
08-30-2012 02:40 AM
synchroblue
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
4
02-06-2010 04:59 PM
parkze17
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
3
04-23-2009 12:10 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: no brake lights



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.