the only reason your gas cap reads....
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
I usually just run '87. I read somewhere that any lower than that can damage your motor but any higher doesn't really help on a low compression motor (other than maybe some added cleaners).
#17
CF Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
17 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: AMC242
I have never seen a piston engine that handles over 10k, but have never built an F1 either, so I don't know. As for it being cheaper, well yeah I don't have a racing team budget. But I had 10k in mods to the engine alone, so it was worth it. I used it to smoke a Lambo off the line and maintain smoking it for like 10 miles (I5 race between Mt Vernon WA and Stanwood WA exits). Absent a racing team budget to build, I think it's about the best that could be done.
The RX-series engine (as well as the Mazda Cosmo, and the old Rotary Pickup) are Wankel Rotary Engines - as mentioned, there is no crankshaft. They use ovoid chambers and eccentric rotors, and picking a "redline" for them is a matter of finely balancing them. 'Way back when, when I was still building strip engines (playing with staged forced induction and exotic fuels,) I was in an informal competition with a guy who specialised in Mazda rotaries. He was working on pushing the redline of his engines - twenty-odd years ago, when we were doing this, he was balancing them to spin 30,000rpm all day long (yes, it's doable!)
Myself, I prefer long-stroke/long-rod piston engines now, due to the higher torque at lower crankshaft speeds. I'm more into torque than horsepower now anyhow. But, I also have fond memories of building a Hemi with pop-ups, running a pair of turbos into an 8-71 to shove in about three atmospheres, and running the damned thing on a cut of 120LL and toluene (damn thing would ping stupid running on anything less than a calculated 125 AKI!)
#19
#20
CF Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
17 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: AMC242
@ZachsXJ - 45psig of boost isn't really that much, compared to some I've seen. Top Fuel dragsters compress the air-fuel charge almost solid at TDC. I've seen Diesel pulling engines (tractor/truck pulls) running staged supercharging at 7-8ATM of boost. There's not much of a limit to what you can do - when someone else is footing the bill with deep pockets!
Consider that I started doing mechanical work when I was six, built my first engine when I was eight, and started making extra money doing mechanical work when I was twelve. I learned theory to go with the practical, and that opened up what I could do - I started building strip engines before I could drive (I was fifteen. I wasn't totally out of vehicles - I'd been flying for a year. Besides, I was big for my age - I'd been driving since I was twelve.)
I never got into the rotary scene, but I'm sure there are still people out there who are very good at it. Or will be again, now that the Wankel is making a comeback with the RX-8...
#21
@ZachsXJ - 45psig of boost isn't really that much, compared to some I've seen. Top Fuel dragsters compress the air-fuel charge almost solid at TDC. I've seen Diesel pulling engines (tractor/truck pulls) running staged supercharging at 7-8ATM of boost. There's not much of a limit to what you can do - when someone else is footing the bill with deep pockets!
A top-fuel supercharger car makes an average of 60lbs of boost and up to 75lbs. Like I stated before, if you have funding from a big company the limits for what you can do go way up.
#22
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: long island
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
yea if you get a ticket for doing 220 your probally not going to be driving for a while and deffinentyl wont have your car
#23
I like it in the dirt
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2003
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Well yeah, when people have ridiculously deep pockets 44lbs of boost is nothing. My buddie's dad has an F350 7.2 diesel that makes 44lbs of boost easy. Diesel engines can take a ridiculous amount of boost because of how they're built, I would LOVE the opportunity to drop a 4BT into my XJ if I could somehow afford it. Diesel engines are so much more practical than gasoline.
A top-fuel supercharger car makes an average of 60lbs of boost and up to 75lbs. Like I stated before, if you have funding from a big company the limits for what you can do go way up.
A top-fuel supercharger car makes an average of 60lbs of boost and up to 75lbs. Like I stated before, if you have funding from a big company the limits for what you can do go way up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carverdave
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
09-01-2024 08:55 AM
Tcq192
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
7
10-23-2015 09:25 AM
dock2778
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
3
09-08-2015 07:04 PM
neocracka
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
09-05-2015 06:50 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)