Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

Replacing Battery Cables - Any Tips??......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2016, 05:27 PM
  #76  
CF Veteran
 
CCKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 8,357
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 74 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Name:  CKHzUY5.gif
Views: 172
Size:  2.43 MB
Old 02-19-2016, 05:36 PM
  #77  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
Crow Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Masonville, NY
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Default

If you up the cabling to ridiculous levels, and size the fusible links to match the cable size, you have now created a circuit that is capable of supplying far more current than it was designed for. This is a fire hazard.

What's the solution?

Size the fusing to match the original circuit to maintain the original protection, of course.


This was my concern. If I'm understanding you correctly, if I use 4AWG cable from the alternator (alt. is stock) I should use a 10AWG fusible link (stock).

Last edited by Crow Horse; 02-19-2016 at 05:39 PM.
Old 02-19-2016, 07:25 PM
  #78  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
Crow Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Masonville, NY
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Default

I was hoping to start this project by first replacing the negative cables but the battery to fender cable bolt foiled me. Soaked it with PB but it appears that the nut is just spinning. I can probably gain access to it by removing the fender liner but it was getting dark, cold and about to rain, so I called it a night. Any tricks without removing the liner?
Old 02-19-2016, 11:23 PM
  #79  
CF Veteran
 
Radi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,302
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by BlueRidgeMark

Yah, except the speaker wiring has nothing to do with the power wiring. (And most outlets are wired with 14/2, unless it's a 20 amp outlet.)
I was referring to AC power wiring. That's the funny part. Heck, you can even buy "audio grade" AC outlets:
If you are building your own audiophile power cords to improve component performance, you'll find the WattGate 381 receptacle essential...
http://www.parts-express.com/wattgat...utlet--110-439

Hey, it does come with "lifetime technical support". A fool and his money are soon....well you know.

Last edited by Radi; 02-19-2016 at 11:26 PM.
Old 02-19-2016, 11:35 PM
  #80  
CF Veteran
 
Radi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,302
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Crow Horse

This was my concern. If I'm understanding you correctly, if I use 4AWG cable from the alternator (alt. is stock) I should use a 10AWG fusible link (stock).
For 4AWG you'd normally use a 8AWG fusible link. You could use the stock 10awg (and may want to- see Blue Ridge Mark's comments) but will be limited to stock current capacity.
Old 02-20-2016, 01:26 AM
  #81  
CF Veteran
 
BlueRidgeMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lost in the wilds of Virginia
Posts: 7,964
Received 957 Likes on 772 Posts
Year: 1998 Classic (I'll get it running soon....) and 02 Grand
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Well, let me see if I can help you. Not likely, but I'll have a go at it.

First of all, there is a QUOTE button, and there is a REPLY button. Blindly quoting an entire post just to reply to it is... not the best use of a forum. It's actually pretty rude to other users (especially guys on phones) because it forces them to scroll through a lot of useless noise.



Originally Posted by aj2494
How is oversizing cable "idiocy",

I didn't say it is. In fact, I disagreed with CCKen on this and recommended increasing the size of your battery cabling.

Originally Posted by aj2494
especially since I already showed that it's less expensive than the alternative being suggested?

Well, since I've already explained that multiple times, I won't go through it again. I see no reason to believe your reading comprehension will improve through repetition. If you have the stuff laying around for free, and want to put up with the downsides of using ridiculously over-sized cables, go for it. Just don't pretend it's somehow better than a sensible upgrade.

Of course, it would be a good idea to make sure you actually understand the downsides, first, which doesn't seem to be the case.


Originally Posted by aj2494
I completely disagree on your opinion of fusable links.

I did not give my "opinion" of fusible links. (Note the spelling.)

What I gave you is industry standard practices, based on sound science and backed up by many decades of industry experience.

But since you brought it up, here's my opinion of them: I don't like them, and prefer to replace them with functionally equivalent fuses. I understand why manufacturers use them, but since I'm doing one-offs for my own use, and don't have to consider the additional cost millions of times over, and stockholders, and profit margins, it makes sense for me to do what does NOT make sense for car manufacturers to do.


Originally Posted by aj2494
What do you think adding fusable links is for? You don't add inline fuses to protect components, it's to protect the wiring in case too much current is drawn through it
Yes, that's what I said.

Originally Posted by aj2494
(unless it's an OEM fusable link, which is there for a reason).
Yes, the same reason as I gave and you just re-stated.


Originally Posted by aj2494
Not having an inline fuse will cause issues if the wire sees more current than it's rated for, which will not happen with the 1/0 welding cable rated at 350A,
Wrong. Short that wire and you'll have either a destroyed battery or a fire, or both. (HINT: Do the math on it. Ohm's Law. Dividing voltage by very close to zero creates currents that approach infinity. It's a bad idea. It tends to let the magic smoke out.)

Originally Posted by aj2494
This is why 5-90 even states on his website that you don't need to fuse when upgrading cables.
Building nice cables doesn't make someone an expert on electricity, but assuming you have accurately relayed what he says, you've missed the point.


The reason that starter circuits are not fused has already been explained, and it's NOT because there is no hazard.


Originally Posted by aj2494
I'm also confused
I noticed.


Originally Posted by aj2494
about your comments on the starter wiring. It's fused on its own,
The cable to the starter is not fused.


Originally Posted by aj2494
Upgrading your main power cables WILL NOT cause a fire, no matter how large you make the cable.

Nobody said it would.


Originally Posted by aj2494
current flowing through it is too high and you're actually melting the insulation, you've got way bigger problems on your hands.

Well, duh. That's the point.


Originally Posted by aj2494
You're overcomplicating the hell out of this.

Nope, just trying to communicate basic electrical facts to people who prefer to believe Internet myths, and can't wrap their heads around anything more complicated than, "Bigger is better!".

It's usually a losing battle.
Old 02-20-2016, 09:14 AM
  #82  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
Crow Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Masonville, NY
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Default

Would or could using a 8 awg fusible link with a 4 awg alt cable possibly allow for excessive current to potentially damage other components down line ? If so, then it would make sense to retain the 10 awg size.
Electronics not being my forte', I defer to those who are better versed in such matters. I do know that I have the capability of doing something that is potentially damaging and feel more comfortable following the advice from those folks who are experts.
Like most things in life, balance is critical. Exceed the design parameters of one component usually moves the wink link elsewhere. I'm just looking to replace some old cables with some that are a wee bit better yet retain the "harmony" of the electronics.....
Old 02-20-2016, 01:35 PM
  #83  
CF Veteran
 
CCKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 8,357
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 74 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Crow Horse
Would or could using a 8 awg fusible link with a 4 awg alt cable possibly allow for excessive current to potentially damage other components down line ? If so, then it would make sense to retain the 10 awg size.
Hard call to make without knowing the Amp rating of the 10 ga. or the 8 ga. fusible links. I can't find what I was looking for on the web about fusible link Amp ratings.


The fusible link is there to protect the cable from the alternator to the buss bar on the end of the PDC in the event the battery shorts out and draws the maximum current from the alternator, which could be 124 Amps with an OEM alternator.


The rest of the primary circuits in the Jeep are protected by Maxi fuses in the PDC (see pic) so they are not really in the fusible link picture.


As stated, the starter power cable is not protected, just its control circuit.


You could try the 8 ga. fusible link but I have no idea what length it would need to be. The original 10 ga. link was to protect the 6 ga. cable but, again, I don't know its Amp rating. Fusible link Amp ratings are dependent upon the wire length and the wire cross section.


98/99 PDC (97 same - sorta):


Name:  %2098%2099%20PDC%20REV%2012_06_2015.jpg
Views: 202
Size:  454.3 KB


99 PDC layout:


Name:  99PDCjpg.jpg
Views: 160
Size:  327.2 KB


Wire (not fusible link) Ampacity chart:


Name:  DC_wire_selection_chartlg.jpg
Views: 1275
Size:  377.0 KB
Old 02-22-2016, 12:15 PM
  #84  
Seasoned Member
 
aj2494's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Eastern Michigan
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by BlueRidgeMark
Well, let me see if I can help you. Not likely, but I'll have a go at it...
First off, I don't want to start a pissing match here, I'm not a big fan of your response and complete lack of respect toward myself. You may disagree with me, but you don't have to be an *** about it. Also, you shouldn't yell at someone for quoting vs replying and then proceed to dissect their post and quote almost every sentence individually. That is very rude, whereas quoting the post you're replying to is definitely an acceptable behavior on forums. It makes it much easier to follow threads IMO.

I might be wrong, and I might be misunderstanding things. Not being an *** to people when they say something inaccurate and actually trying to educate them is generally more effective, and much more productive to the whole helping people thing.

Since most of that post was just you trying to be demeaning, the only technical aspect I want to touch on is the shorting of the starter cable. How would the cable be grounded without someone removing one terminal with the battery still connected and touching it to ground? Anybody who does that deserves to have their vehicle burnt to the ground for forgetting one of the cardinal rules of automotive work. I certainly understand the downside to having a wire be able to carry too much current, and that fusing can resolve this problem. It's just not a necessary step in this case and really isn't done that often.

I never said this would make an XJ's electrical system perform better, or improve any basic electrical functions. No internet myths involved. All I pointed out was that you can get 1/0 welding cable for less than the cost of 4 AWG marine cable, the final product will be significantly beefier, and it gives plenty of headroom for winches, air, lights, etc. I don't know where this was spun to mean I'm saying it's better on a stock system or will somehow be a performance improvement. I'm not quite sure why you made it so personal and began insulting me.

Last edited by aj2494; 02-22-2016 at 12:38 PM.
Old 02-22-2016, 05:28 PM
  #85  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
Crow Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Masonville, NY
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Default

Guys, I appreciate everyone's advice and opinions but I REALLY need you to put your thinking caps on.. I replaced the negative/ground cables (3) and now I have a crank no start condition. See my other thread and I really could use your help......
Old 02-22-2016, 10:53 PM
  #86  
Senior Member
 
rzldzl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: cariboo, bc
Posts: 606
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Crow Horse
Guys, I appreciate everyone's advice and opinions but I REALLY need you to put your thinking caps on.. I replaced the negative/ground cables (3) and now I have a crank no start condition. See my other thread and I really could use your help......
umm, link?
Old 02-23-2016, 02:30 AM
  #87  
CF Veteran
 
Radi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,302
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Crow Horse
Would or could using a 8 awg fusible link with a 4 awg alt cable possibly allow for excessive current to potentially damage other components down line ?
No, it's harmless. The electronic components will only draw what they need, even if the source can supply much more.
The exception is under a fault condition when the larger wiring can allow more current to flow. Of course if you have a fault condition, the device drawing the excess current is already broken.
Old 02-23-2016, 09:09 AM
  #88  
CF Veteran
 
madmanmarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

I replied in your other post.
You are making this much harder than you have to.
Buy a cable set from someone & install it. Done.
Then diagnose if you still have a issue.
Old 02-23-2016, 10:53 AM
  #89  
Seasoned Member
 
aj2494's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Eastern Michigan
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I don't really see how buying an off the shelf set at this point makes any sense. Crow's probably work fine. It sounds like something got disturbed during the install.

Crow, I know this sounds simple but I didn't see you mention it anywhere. Did you check all your fuses?

Last edited by aj2494; 02-23-2016 at 11:12 AM.
Old 02-23-2016, 08:41 PM
  #90  
CF Veteran
 
madmanmarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

I agree.
But he mentioned he wanted to change cables.
I replied in his other post regarding his starting problem.
A second thread is part of the problem.


Quick Reply: Replacing Battery Cables - Any Tips??......



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.