Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

The Ultimate Fuel Economy XJ Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2010 | 03:13 PM
  #46  
BillyBoy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 30
From: Detroit, Michigan
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Uhhh yeah-

All i have to say is SEAFOAM!

Upped my MPG about 3 or 4.
You have no idea how well or poorly your rig was taken care of by the last guy-
It must've cleaned out all the gunk-
If they call me i'll do a commercial for them.

Heck, I'd MARRY them!
Old 03-13-2010 | 01:54 AM
  #47  
SHO_91's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Year: 96
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5l I-4
Default

An old and cheap trick for cleaning gunk out of the engine internals is to add 1/2 qt of tranny fluid to your engine oil, shortly before changing it (I do it 1x/year, about 300-400 miles before changing. I drive upwards of 35k miles per year). Won't save a lot of gas, tho.
Old 03-15-2010 | 10:47 AM
  #48  
captainofiron's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 3
From: Austin, Texas
Year: 1991
Engine: 4.0 I-6 H.O.
Default

Originally Posted by SHO_91
An old and cheap trick for cleaning gunk out of the engine internals is to add 1/2 qt of tranny fluid to your engine oil, shortly before changing it (I do it 1x/year, about 300-400 miles before changing. I drive upwards of 35k miles per year). Won't save a lot of gas, tho.
did that and then realized it was a bad idea, my Jeep started leaking engine oil all over the place, since then I changed the oil pan gasket the rear main, the valve cover, and it still leaks sometimes
Old 03-17-2010 | 03:07 AM
  #49  
SHO_91's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Year: 96
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5l I-4
Default

Originally Posted by captainofiron
did that and then realized it was a bad idea, my Jeep started leaking engine oil all over the place, since then I changed the oil pan gasket the rear main, the valve cover, and it still leaks sometimes
Sorry to hear that. Still, I'm not entirely convinced, it was the tranny fluid. I and a lot of my friends do that regularly, with no ill side effects. It's been around for ages, just don't leave it in for an extended period of time.
Old 03-17-2010 | 08:54 AM
  #50  
sexy_hotfootball_stud00's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by SHO_91
There are several techniques to max fuel mileage, unfortunately, you'd be driving the thing like a granny. Quality fuel, ignition system in good wroking order, good O2 sensors, non-binding brakes, properly inflated tires, everything lubed are pre-requisites. You could use synthetic engine oil & tranny fluid to minimize friction. I like driving stick, it's better on gas, my '96, however, could use a 6th gear. Further, any performance upgrade, such as CAI, larger throttle body, turbo, S/C and the like, uses more gasoline.
Then there's driving style: Stay at or slightly below speed limit, avoid sudden changes of the go-pedal, try to approach a traffic light without much braking so as to shift down to the highest possible gear without lugging the engine (1500+ rpm), try to park in such a manner that you can take off without having to back out, AND, generally, your fuel consumption is proportional with the distance of your right foot to the floor... I have heard of people getting 45+ mpg (Honda Accord) or 50% over EPA rating by driving like this.
the only reason performance upgrades would rob gas mileage is because when you do the upgrade, you like to use it and feel the difference. adding horsepower decreases the stress on the engine to move it. but when you add horsepower and tromp on it, yes it will use gas more
Old 03-17-2010 | 09:01 AM
  #51  
captainofiron's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 3
From: Austin, Texas
Year: 1991
Engine: 4.0 I-6 H.O.
Default

Originally Posted by SHO_91
Sorry to hear that. Still, I'm not entirely convinced, it was the tranny fluid. I and a lot of my friends do that regularly, with no ill side effects. It's been around for ages, just don't leave it in for an extended period of time.
well my xj does have 285K, i think that has a bit to do with it also, haha
Old 03-17-2010 | 09:14 AM
  #52  
FrenchXJ's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: France
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

When I got mine, my better tank was 14 MPG... 3.07 axle, 5 speed, and original tires...full stock with 100 000 miles...

Now I got a 3 inches lift, 235/75R15 cooper 8x15 wheels. BBK valve body, 3 inches exhaust, no cat.
engine oil changed, new plugs, new wires, caps and rotor. new injectors.
did grease all the point springs to wheel bearings...

I got 105 000 miles now, and i did 350 miles for the best, and regulary do 290.

will get rid of the macanical fan, new transfer case and axles oil changed asap, and as many person already told, the driver is the first responsible for a good fuel economy...
Old 03-19-2010 | 12:23 AM
  #53  
SHO_91's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Year: 96
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5l I-4
Default

Originally Posted by sexy_hotfootball_stud00
the only reason performance upgrades would rob gas mileage is because when you do the upgrade, you like to use it and feel the difference. adding horsepower decreases the stress on the engine to move it. but when you add horsepower and tromp on it, yes it will use gas more
Anything that crams more air/fuel mix into the engine, is considered a performance upgrade. The ideal air-fuel ratio is a ECM controlled constant (it's roughly 14.7 / 1, provided, all the related sensors are up to snuff). Case in point: CAI, takes advantage of colder, therefore denser, air, which equals more fuel. T/Cs and S/Cs are self explanatory (this is called forced induction). Yes, Yes. You get the power, of course. But this is a fuel economy thread. This is why sports car drivers usually live with this drawback. And, yes, added HP over factory (or, torque, rather: HP = tq * rpm / 5250) puts a higher strain on engine components.
What I am trying to say is that lo-tq, hi-rpm HP is less taxing on an engine than monster tq.

Last edited by SHO_91; 03-19-2010 at 01:15 AM.
Old 03-30-2010 | 05:53 PM
  #54  
250kcherokee's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

What method did you guys use to run the seafoam through the motor, I know there is a few. I'm getting 13mpg at the most currently and that's with a brand new air/fuel filter, 89 octane, proper tire pressure, flowmaster muffler, new plugs and rescently changed motor oil. I would like to do all of the fluids and seafoam when i get the money.
Old 03-30-2010 | 10:31 PM
  #55  
azxj99's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

im shocked no one has mentioned a programmer for fuel econ. they can add hp but can change shift points for autos. Driver number 1 cause for bad fuel econ. trust me, after my speeding ticket ive gone from 12 to 28 mix of city, highway and 4x4
Old 03-30-2010 | 10:41 PM
  #56  
Tural's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 0
From: Forest, VA
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Originally Posted by azxj99
im shocked no one has mentioned a programmer for fuel econ. they can add hp but can change shift points for autos. Driver number 1 cause for bad fuel econ. trust me, after my speeding ticket ive gone from 12 to 28 mix of city, highway and 4x4
sent my hypertech max energy last week. i'm an mpg freak, so i analyze every aspect of it. for $380 didn't even get 1mpg. smoother acceleration though.
Old 03-30-2010 | 10:48 PM
  #57  
azxj99's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

should have got the econ one or any that has an option where you can choose econ or performance
Old 03-30-2010 | 10:49 PM
  #58  
Tural's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 0
From: Forest, VA
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Originally Posted by FrenchXJ
When I got mine, my better tank was 14 MPG... 3.07 axle, 5 speed, and original tires...full stock with 100 000 miles...

Now I got a 3 inches lift, 235/75R15 cooper 8x15 wheels. BBK valve body, 3 inches exhaust, no cat.
engine oil changed, new plugs, new wires, caps and rotor. new injectors.
did grease all the point springs to wheel bearings...

I got 105 000 miles now, and i did 350 miles for the best, and regulary do 290.

will get rid of the macanical fan, new transfer case and axles oil changed asap, and as many person already told, the driver is the first responsible for a good fuel economy...
drive like me. i think people like flipping me off they say i keep them from getting to WalMart a minute faster.
Old 03-30-2010 | 11:05 PM
  #59  
SHO_91's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Year: 96
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5l I-4
Default

Originally Posted by Tural
sent my hypertech max energy last week. i'm an mpg freak, so i analyze every aspect of it. for $380 didn't even get 1mpg. smoother acceleration though.
Absolutely. When it comes down to fuel economy, the stock setup is best, hands down. They know, what they are doing at the factory. But, if you want performance and don't care much about fuel efficiency, then the tried and true upgrades (CAI, S/C, T/C) will do best. And, lose as much sprung weight as possible.
Old 03-30-2010 | 11:09 PM
  #60  
Tural's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 0
From: Forest, VA
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

max energy combines econ. still a piece of junk in my opinion. other people might think different though. i honestly can't complain about my mpg. i get 18 in town and 21-23 highway with 4.5" lift and 31's.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.