PA cherokee club
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 3
From: Newport, pa
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 3
From: Newport, pa
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 3
From: Newport, pa
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
The d30 had a tiny ring and pinion, and the wheel bearing hubs suck because you will be changing them in some yearly basis, especially with bigger tires. They also have tiny axle tubes which makes them easy to bend. With stock gears/no locker they will hold up for a bit and not explode, but if you gear it it will become a ticking time bomb due to the extra stress.
A d44 does have the same u joints, but all you have to do is run GOOD joints and you'll be fine. The ring and pinion is bigger and stronger, the housing/tubes are way stronger, the brakes are a HELL of a lot better, the wheel bearings are(can't think of the term right now, to early) not the stupid hub design, a lot cheaper, a lot stronger, and you have locking hubs.
Building a Dana 30 is just polishing a turd. But if you don't wheel it much and stay on the street, then you can get away with lightly polishing it.
It's cheaper to swap in a 44 then build a 30 to equal(almost) strength
Ya know what... Doesn't matter.... The d30 had a tiny ring and pinion, and the wheel bearing hubs suck because you will be changing them in some yearly basis, especially with bigger tires. They also have tiny axle tubes which makes them easy to bend. With stock gears/no locker they will hold up for a bit and not explode, but if you gear it it will become a ticking time bomb due to the extra stress. A d44 does have the same u joints, but all you have to do is run GOOD joints and you'll be fine. The ring and pinion is bigger and stronger, the housing/tubes are way stronger, the brakes are a HELL of a lot better, the wheel bearings are(can't think of the term right now, to early) not the stupid hub design, a lot cheaper, a lot stronger, and you have locking hubs. Building a Dana 30 is just polishing a turd. But if you don't wheel it much and stay on the street, then you can get away with lightly polishing it. It's cheaper to swap in a 44 then build a 30 to equal(almost) strength
Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, PA
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Okay Yeah cause I'm looking at getting 35's when it's all said and done. So I want something that will hold up with gears and a locker. Right now my 30 has 4.56 gears and a locker and I drive it every day and don't want it to go boom
money wise. U ll spend the same polishing the 30 or building up a 44. U might as well as go for a 44. And I bet u ll get a good return on selling your 30 because obviously it isn't stock anymore.
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 3
From: Newport, pa
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
From: Chester County, PA
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
my d30 has 4.10's its locked, 1/4" control arm brackets and 1ton heim steering, thats as far as i wanted to go because its a pos. I take it to rausch with only 32" tires and i stretch shafts kill 3month old u joints and have to replace a 6 month old wheel bearing already, and on top of that the pinion bearings are toasted now also, dont forget im only running 32's not 35's, at this point i could have built a d60 more or less.... save the pennys and build anything but a d30 unless you only plan to do 1 day of hard wheeling a year Edit: and on top of that i got a faulty moog upper ball joint that kept popping out of the c so ive had to deal with that also...
Last edited by Wolfmann; 01-23-2015 at 10:34 AM.