small cars, which one is the best bang for your buck?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wareham, MA
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
small cars, which one is the best bang for your buck?
so, im looking in a 1-2k dollar range for a car, im mechanically inclined so if its a p.o.s. it doesnt bother me. that being said what is the best small car, thats fuel efficient, but is also decently fast and you can do a decent amount of aftermarket stuff to them? im trying to stay domestic but im flexible. i was thinking of maybe getting a chevy cavalier z24 for 1500, its in good shape, but i dont know how fast it is and i dont want something with a 0-60 of 12 seconds. my jeeps pretty fast and its all stock so something as fast would be nice.
#2
CF Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montpelier, Ohio
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 92
Engine: 4.0
You won't beat a Honda accord or civic for longevity and reliability. Im a made in the USA all the way guy, but you just cant kill those old Hondas.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Warren, PA 16365
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
^ agreed. I was going to say 88-91 Honda, CRX, Civic Hatch or Sedan, or if you want an AWD parts hauler, look for a Wagovan.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wareham, MA
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
ive heard hondas are expensive to fix though, and i live paycheck to paycheck as it is. and i am a fan of civics but its hard to find old ones for sale around my area.
#5
CF Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montpelier, Ohio
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 92
Engine: 4.0
I had a civic for a lil bit and completely ran it out of oil and it diddnt die. My buddy also got drunk and followed me in my MJ through a field and had we on the rev limiter the entire time and it still ran good!
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wareham, MA
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Trending Topics
#9
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ormond Beach Fl
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Chevy 350
my buddy had a ford escort zx2 that was quick and he beat the tar out of that car and it never broke, he even auto crossed it for a while
#10
first generation Plymouth, Dodge Neons, relatively cheap, $500 to $1,000 cars, decent mileage, & lots of goodies available. can be made quite fast. I been into & out of the scene for years, owned quite a few different ones, & have owned both SOHC & DOHC versions. still have 2 & a parts car, but dont drive them presently, got tired of them.
the early 95 models are different, the ones made in "1994", however the regular 95, still is different from the 96 to 99. earlier 95s have different PVC systems, valve covers, & different bearing tang locations when you build the engine, plus the earlier cars were 4 lug, the later were 5 lug wheels, different brakes, diffent steering wheel, the 96 to 99 uses a "clutch pack" the 95 uses a normal clutch. the 96-99 has a flexplate like automatic cars, but the clutch pack bolts to it same as a torque converter. once you get through the learning curve, they can be quite fun, & a depending on gearing you could get low 30mpg to upper 30mpg the tall gear pushes 40mpg, & thats stock.the lower gear will get 32 or so mpg.
the early 95 models are different, the ones made in "1994", however the regular 95, still is different from the 96 to 99. earlier 95s have different PVC systems, valve covers, & different bearing tang locations when you build the engine, plus the earlier cars were 4 lug, the later were 5 lug wheels, different brakes, diffent steering wheel, the 96 to 99 uses a "clutch pack" the 95 uses a normal clutch. the 96-99 has a flexplate like automatic cars, but the clutch pack bolts to it same as a torque converter. once you get through the learning curve, they can be quite fun, & a depending on gearing you could get low 30mpg to upper 30mpg the tall gear pushes 40mpg, & thats stock.the lower gear will get 32 or so mpg.
#11
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S.E. Tx
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6 firepower ignition, cat-back w/ magnaflow muffler, poweraid tb spacer, optima blue top
Early 70s vw beetle. Parts are incredibly cheap, can be made to go as fast as you want, EASY to work on, plentiful, 30 mpg stock, and kool. Buy in price is cheaper than the earlier ones and later ('75+) have expensive fuel injection. Just throwin it out there.
#12
I dont mean to downplay, but I been into & out of the aircooled VW scene for 30 years, & have maybe 6 old beetles, & 8 busses, a type 3 fastback, & 1 vanagon.
yes they can be made extremely fast, & very fun, but for the cheap, not like they used to be, lots of other vehicles can be done alot cheaper. plus VWs are shall we say different, the engines are unique, easy to work on, but pretty much different from everything else.
#13
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S.E. Tx
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6 firepower ignition, cat-back w/ magnaflow muffler, poweraid tb spacer, optima blue top
For sure different but that's what make them great.
Yes the parts have gone up but i still find them cheaper than most other cars to fix. They're so basic that instead of replacing some computer or complicated part it would be a basic part that is easier and cheaper to manufacture.
Off topic but good to see an air-cooled fan here and one that's had a type 3. I have (so far) a '74 beetle and a '72 squareback (man is that one hard to find parts for).
Yes the parts have gone up but i still find them cheaper than most other cars to fix. They're so basic that instead of replacing some computer or complicated part it would be a basic part that is easier and cheaper to manufacture.
Off topic but good to see an air-cooled fan here and one that's had a type 3. I have (so far) a '74 beetle and a '72 squareback (man is that one hard to find parts for).
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Leeds, Maine
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I had a 2000 Z24 as a DD beater. It did well, except it was a 5 speed and I had problems with bearings in the Getrag trans. I replaced some of them, ran it for many miles, then it seized up on the way home one night.
Got good mileage and ran well, but I'd stay away from the standard transmissions.
Got good mileage and ran well, but I'd stay away from the standard transmissions.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Barney Georgia
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
1984 to 1987 Toyota Corolla SR-5 or GTS, chassis code AE86. I had 3 and loved them. Stupid easy to work on, 2 door coupe, rear wheel drive. The SR5s were 1.6L SOHC 8 valve carbbed motors, could be had with a 5 speed or auto, the GTS was a 1.6L DOHC 16v EFI motor 5 speed only. Most of the GTS' had LSD rear ends, all had 4 wheel disc brakes, and pretty quick cars. Mine would smoke the tires through 3rd gear and would run away from Golf GTIs and Miatas on twisty mountain roads. The first gen MR-2s have the same motors. Very reliable cars and fun as hell to drive. Can be had on the cheap too. But they are getting hard to find.