2014 Cherokee what?
03-26-2013 | 11:31 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
2014 Cherokee what?
Personaly I dont like the way it looks. Looks to much like a grand to me they should of brought back the actual cherokee not what ever this thing is. Basicly im glad the names back but it looks like a hunk of plastic now instead of a cherokee. Whats everyones opinion on this?
03-26-2013 | 03:09 PM
#7
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 2
From: Colorado
Year: 1992 Cherokee Sport
Engine: Bone-Stock 242
All modern Jeeps are mall humping grocery getters. Jeep just managed to make an incredibly ugly one this year and decided to bastardize the Cherokee name while they where at it.
Trending Topics
03-27-2013 | 12:44 AM
#9
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
From: Oswego, IL
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Nah dont worry. its gonna happen anyway. I came here looking for it so I could comment.
From a business perspective I am sure the execs would say we are way too small a group to care about.
I think they vastly under estimate the appeal of a retro true cherokee would have.
I dont see any real difference from the compass and it actually makes the liberty look better.
oh well its not the first time a car company screwed that pooch, remember the new pontiac GTO? so much opportunity pissed away on a car that looks like a sunfire.
From a business perspective I am sure the execs would say we are way too small a group to care about.
I think they vastly under estimate the appeal of a retro true cherokee would have.
I dont see any real difference from the compass and it actually makes the liberty look better.
oh well its not the first time a car company screwed that pooch, remember the new pontiac GTO? so much opportunity pissed away on a car that looks like a sunfire.
03-27-2013 | 01:12 AM
#10
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 2
From: Colorado
Year: 1992 Cherokee Sport
Engine: Bone-Stock 242
Nah dont worry. its gonna happen anyway. I came here looking for it so I could comment.
From a business perspective I am sure the execs would say we are way too small a group to care about.
I think they vastly under estimate the appeal of a retro true cherokee would have.
I dont see any real difference from the compass and it actually makes the liberty look better.
oh well its not the first time a car company screwed that pooch, remember the new pontiac GTO? so much opportunity pissed away on a car that looks like a sunfire.
From a business perspective I am sure the execs would say we are way too small a group to care about.
I think they vastly under estimate the appeal of a retro true cherokee would have.
I dont see any real difference from the compass and it actually makes the liberty look better.
oh well its not the first time a car company screwed that pooch, remember the new pontiac GTO? so much opportunity pissed away on a car that looks like a sunfire.
03-27-2013 | 01:25 AM
#11
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Dayton OH
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
wow! i just checked by using the search bar, there are 16 threads(including this one) on this topic lol, i really wish the new people would use the search feature
03-27-2013 | 01:27 AM
#12
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 1
From: Franksville, Wi
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Go check and see how many threads there are on 'wat lift shuld I git' and 'wat tires shuld I git'. Lol. I bet there are thousands.
03-27-2013 | 02:17 AM
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: middleburg fl
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Personaly I dont like the way it looks. Looks to much like a grand to me they should of brought back the actual cherokee not what ever this thing is. Basicly im glad the names back but it looks like a hunk of plastic now instead of a cherokee. Whats everyones opinion on this?
Attachment 183111
Attachment 183111
