Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

2014 Cherokee what?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2013, 03:35 AM
  #16  
CF Veteran
 
mrfajita's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1996
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by 1976Mustang
And don't forget the Aztec. Pontiac really screwed themselves, kinda sad honestly. And the new Cherokee is based off an Italian crossover sports station wagon thing... The Giulia i think.
That Alfa looks sweet, like almost every Alfa does. So much better than the 2014 Cherovan
Old 03-27-2013, 10:25 AM
  #17  
CF Veteran
 
1976Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1992 Cherokee Sport
Engine: Bone-Stock 242
Default

Originally Posted by mrfajita
That Alfa looks sweet, like almost every Alfa does. So much better than the 2014 Cherovan
Eh I'm so so on this Alfa, but i do like them in general.
Old 03-27-2013, 10:25 AM
  #18  
CF Veteran
 
1976Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1992 Cherokee Sport
Engine: Bone-Stock 242
Default

Originally Posted by NewJerseyXJ609
Wait was this before or after ktms thread? Lol
I think KTM was one of the first guys to start this.
Old 03-27-2013, 01:24 PM
  #19  
CF Veteran
 
NewJerseyXJ609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: l6 HO
Default

Originally Posted by 1976Mustang
I think KTM was one of the first guys to start this.
I meant his thread joking about if anyone had seen the 2014 cherokee. Lol
Old 03-27-2013, 05:37 PM
  #20  
CF Veteran
 
1991Jeep_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fauquier County, Virginia
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Default

God I am gonna get SERIOUS flack for this... buttttt..


*Flame Shields Up*

I kind of like it (the 2014 Cherokee). Gonna try and convince my wife to get it instead of the Juke. We still have my '91 for true grit, stupid simple, ever reliable blizzard/hauling/grunt duty. Also I drive my XJ to work when it snows. My wife needs 4x4 or AWD, and this works. Def not as much a off-road warrior as the XJ obviously, but I do like it.

So, where do I hide?
Old 03-27-2013, 05:43 PM
  #21  
CF Veteran
 
1976Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1992 Cherokee Sport
Engine: Bone-Stock 242
Default

Originally Posted by 1991Jeep_Man
God I am gonna get SERIOUS flack for this... buttttt..


*Flame Shields Up*

I kind of like it (the 2014 Cherokee). Gonna try and convince my wife to get it instead of the Juke. We still have my '91 for true grit, stupid simple, ever reliable blizzard/hauling/grunt duty. Also I drive my XJ to work when it snows. My wife needs 4x4 or AWD, and this works. Def not as much a off-road warrior as the XJ obviously, but I do like it.

So, where do I hide?
There's a nice rock over there ===> lol


Anyways it was just voted the ugliest car in the world by a British site, and it's not even being produced yet. Meanwhile, Jalopnik wrote more BS on how "Capable" and "Better" it is than the XJ. I wanted to kill myself.
Old 03-27-2013, 05:48 PM
  #22  
CF Veteran
 
1991Jeep_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fauquier County, Virginia
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Default

Originally Posted by 1976Mustang
There's a nice rock over there ===> lol


Anyways it was just voted the ugliest car in the world by a British site, and it's not even being produced yet. Meanwhile, Jalopnik wrote more BS on how "Capable" and "Better" it is than the XJ. I wanted to kill myself.
That rock was occupied by another person hiding. lol

The Brits are highly critical though, and European styling has a huge variance from traditional American styling. Even though Fiat played a huge hand in this new Cherokee, it is still a mix of Americana and Italiana, and purists will hate that. Hopefully all this hate will keep the price tag low

Jalopnik is retarded. While I like this new vehicle, it is NOT the world renowned XJ by any comparison.
Old 03-27-2013, 06:01 PM
  #23  
CF Veteran
 
1976Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1992 Cherokee Sport
Engine: Bone-Stock 242
Default

Originally Posted by 1991Jeep_Man
That rock was occupied by another person hiding. lol

The Brits are highly critical though, and European styling has a huge variance from traditional American styling. Even though Fiat played a huge hand in this new Cherokee, it is still a mix of Americana and Italiana, and purists will hate that. Hopefully all this hate will keep the price tag low

Jalopnik is retarded. While I like this new vehicle, it is NOT the world renowned XJ by any comparison.
God that artical pisses me off. They got 3 facts about the XJ wrong. The engine HP, ground clearance, and achievable MPG. Not to mention the tool who made it doesn't know jack-crap about offroading.... WHAT THE ACTUAL ****, A 9-speed auto and no standard tranny available?! God that's retarded.
Old 03-27-2013, 06:22 PM
  #24  
Member
 
MatteBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 inline six
Default

I am sure I'll be cruxified for saying this but, I like it. It's a big change and isn't meant to be what the XJ was but, it's a very different car market today. 20mpg and the old safety standards simply would not cut it. I like the new Cherokee as what is but, it would not replace my XJ. Of course, mine isn't exactly stock to start out with.

The like the looks of the Trail Hawk version.

Last edited by MatteBlack; 03-27-2013 at 06:25 PM.
Old 03-27-2013, 07:03 PM
  #25  
CF Veteran
 
1976Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1992 Cherokee Sport
Engine: Bone-Stock 242
Default

I'm starting to like the basic shape of the front, my only issue is the headlights and that massive bumper. The back still makes my stomach churn though. And I'll agree on paper it's a great little crossover and i doubt anyone here would even care to hate on it IF it didn't use the Cherokee name. If they called it something different i would be perfectly fine with it.
Old 03-27-2013, 08:13 PM
  #26  
CF Veteran
 
1991Jeep_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fauquier County, Virginia
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Default

Originally Posted by MatteBlack
I am sure I'll be cruxified for saying this but, I like it. It's a big change and isn't meant to be what the XJ was but, it's a very different car market today. 20mpg and the old safety standards simply would not cut it. I like the new Cherokee as what is but, it would not replace my XJ. Of course, mine isn't exactly stock to start out with.

The like the looks of the Trail Hawk version.
Wanna hide with me? Lmao
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skarpyona
Cherokee Chat
37
04-22-2022 08:05 AM
WaywardTurtle
Introductions
15
09-29-2021 07:26 PM
JJM
KL Cherokee Tech
5
09-09-2015 12:12 PM
IB Nolan
Announcements
4
09-08-2015 04:25 PM
ROCKRIDGE 4WD
Vendor Showcase
0
08-25-2015 06:49 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 2014 Cherokee what?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 PM.