Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

242 vs 231 build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2018, 08:06 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GreaseMonkey17's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 645
Received 33 Likes on 23 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Is anyone running a hack and tap ?
Old 02-12-2018, 08:12 PM
  #17  
CF Veteran
 
00t444e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 3,609
Received 457 Likes on 370 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by GreaseMonkey17
Is anyone running a hack and tap ?
I don't have one currently but if I ever do an SYE it will be the hack and tap, several people run it with no problems, and as cheap as it is I see no good reason not to use a hack and tap if you need an SYE. A regular SYE does come with a bigger output shaft but the stock output shaft holds up just fine for 99% of what most people do with it.
Old 02-12-2018, 08:27 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GreaseMonkey17's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 645
Received 33 Likes on 23 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by 00t444e
I don't have one currently but if I ever do an SYE it will be the hack and tap, several people run it with no problems, and as cheap as it is I see no good reason not to use a hack and tap if you need an SYE. A regular SYE does come with a bigger output shaft but the stock output shaft holds up just fine for 99% of what most people do with it.
that’s my thoughts I will mainly be driving it to work on bad days and the most carnage it will see will be on the farm when hunting and I’d like to take a trip to Moab but mainly to see it don’t plan on tearing anything up .
Old 02-13-2018, 08:49 AM
  #19  
CF Veteran
 
unidentifiedbomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DE
Posts: 6,098
Received 248 Likes on 207 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0
Default

I would just be careful, a lot of people break bits or taps doing it. I got lucky and my buddy sold me his rebuilt 242 with an already barely used Tom Woods SYE installed. He went to an atlas :drool:
Old 03-04-2018, 07:53 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GreaseMonkey17's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 645
Received 33 Likes on 23 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Found a 231 with new chain and SYE 1.5 years ago and a rough country custom shaft for 280 dollars . What to do what to do ?!
Old 03-05-2018, 02:48 PM
  #21  
CF Veteran
 
Morat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Riding of Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,433
Received 67 Likes on 57 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by 00t444e
The 242 isn't a bad transfer case, the 231 and 242 are about equal in strength. The only drawbacks of the 242 are less aftermarket support and they take longer to shift in and out of 4x4.
Of course, with a 242 you don't actually have to take it out of 4WD. I only go into 2WD to check it still works.
But yeah, 231s have all the aftermarket.
Old 03-05-2018, 04:28 PM
  #22  
CF Veteran
 
Martlor13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Northern New Mexico
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Morat
Of course, with a 242 you don't actually have to take it out of 4WD. I only go into 2WD to check it still works.
But yeah, 231s have all the aftermarket.
You run 4wd even when you dont need it? I hate awd vehicles, i dont think i would like my jeep to essentially be an awd type haha
Old 03-05-2018, 04:51 PM
  #23  
CF Veteran
 
00t444e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 3,609
Received 457 Likes on 370 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Martlor13
You run 4wd even when you dont need it? I hate awd vehicles, i dont think i would like my jeep to essentially be an awd type haha
Same here, no all wheel drives for me.
Old 03-06-2018, 04:27 AM
  #24  
CF Veteran
 
Morat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Riding of Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,433
Received 67 Likes on 57 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Funny isn't it.
The feeling "over here" was against vehicles that ran in 2WD because Land Rover Defenders are full time 4WD with a locking centre diff and they're the most common offroader. I'm pretty sure that's why all XJs here have a 242 so they can be full time 4WD like a "Proper" off roader.

I can see why you wouldn't want to be driving something with front wheel drive assisted by rear wheel drive through the traction control, I've only ever found those to feel weird - but that's not what a 242 is doing. It's permanent 4WD which means my XJ behaves really well under power on wet corners and pulling out of junctions. I'd guess that's not something you need much in New Mexico

Anyway. I'm not saying you're wrong - I just find it interesting that the attitudes to the same tech are so different.
Old 03-06-2018, 07:57 AM
  #25  
CF Veteran
 
00t444e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 3,609
Received 457 Likes on 370 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Morat
Funny isn't it.
The feeling "over here" was against vehicles that ran in 2WD because Land Rover Defenders are full time 4WD with a locking centre diff and they're the most common offroader. I'm pretty sure that's why all XJs here have a 242 so they can be full time 4WD like a "Proper" off roader.

I can see why you wouldn't want to be driving something with front wheel drive assisted by rear wheel drive through the traction control, I've only ever found those to feel weird - but that's not what a 242 is doing. It's permanent 4WD which means my XJ behaves really well under power on wet corners and pulling out of junctions. I'd guess that's not something you need much in New Mexico

Anyway. I'm not saying you're wrong - I just find it interesting that the attitudes to the same tech are so different.
Awd takes the fun out of it, you can't do a burn out in an awd, and is uses more fuel. Also I absolutely hate any traction control, the only traction control I need is my right foot.
Old 03-06-2018, 08:38 AM
  #26  
CF Veteran
 
Martlor13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Northern New Mexico
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Morat
Funny isn't it.
The feeling "over here" was against vehicles that ran in 2WD because Land Rover Defenders are full time 4WD with a locking centre diff and they're the most common offroader. I'm pretty sure that's why all XJs here have a 242 so they can be full time 4WD like a "Proper" off roader.

I can see why you wouldn't want to be driving something with front wheel drive assisted by rear wheel drive through the traction control, I've only ever found those to feel weird - but that's not what a 242 is doing. It's permanent 4WD which means my XJ behaves really well under power on wet corners and pulling out of junctions. I'd guess that's not something you need much in New Mexico

Anyway. I'm not saying you're wrong - I just find it interesting that the attitudes to the same tech are so different.
You'd be wrong lol....new mexico isnt just desert like a lot of people seem to think. I live in the northern part. 5500 or so feet above sea level with awesome mointains close by, desert areas in another direction. I'm like surrounded by all kinds of differrent terraims. Its pretty cool. But most time is spent headed up to mountain areas where rain and snow are prevalent. Not just on the dirt roads, on the pavememt to get to places. I just dont like awd haaha
Old 03-06-2018, 11:14 AM
  #27  
CF Veteran
 
Morat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Riding of Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,433
Received 67 Likes on 57 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Martlor13
You'd be wrong lol....new mexico isnt just desert like a lot of people seem to think. I live in the northern part. 5500 or so feet above sea level with awesome mointains close by, desert areas in another direction. I'm like surrounded by all kinds of differrent terraims. Its pretty cool. But most time is spent headed up to mountain areas where rain and snow are prevalent. Not just on the dirt roads, on the pavememt to get to places. I just dont like awd haaha
Sounds like a great place to have a Jeep!
I'm still not getting this AWD thing though. I understand AWD to be the fake 4WD that modern crossovers have where they roll along in 2WD all the time and then do traction control accross both axles when the driven wheel start to slip.
That isn't what a 242 does. All 4 wheels are driven the whole time, just like a 231 except you have the option to unlock the TC to give the equivalent of an open centre diff so you can turn on pavement.
If you don't like it, 2WD is still there....

Still, I guess it's horses for courses.
Old 03-06-2018, 01:22 PM
  #28  
CF Veteran
 
Tbone289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SEMO
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L6
Default

I tend to agree that full-time 4WD really isn't the same as AWD, and they probably shouldn't be lumped into a general "AWD" description. AWD is usually a FWD-based system that doesn't have a transfer case and low range option. However, some full-time 4WD systems have been called AWD by their manufacturers (at least in the US), and I think that has muddied the terminology a bit.

With that said, I really have no use for full-time 4WD because I've rarely been in a situation where I needed more than 2WD on pavement. On those rare occasions, traction was low and part-time 4WD fit the bill, and it always fits the bill off-road as well. Full-time 4WD really just complicates a perfectly usable system, IMO, but I realize that other's uses may differ from mine.

Last edited by Tbone289; 03-06-2018 at 01:36 PM.
Old 03-06-2018, 01:57 PM
  #29  
CF Veteran
 
00t444e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 3,609
Received 457 Likes on 370 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Tbone289
I tend to agree that full-time 4WD really isn't the same as AWD, and they probably shouldn't be lumped into a general "AWD" description. AWD is usually a FWD-based system that doesn't have a transfer case and low range option. However, some full-time 4WD systems have been called AWD by their manufacturers (at least in the US), and I think that has muddied the terminology a bit.

With that said, I really have no use for full-time 4WD because I've rarely been in a situation where I needed more than 2WD on pavement. On those rare occasions, traction was low and part-time 4WD fit the bill, and it always fits the bill off-road as well. Full-time 4WD really just complicates a perfectly usable system, IMO, but I realize that other's uses may differ from mine.
I agree, I don't have much use for the full time on my np242, I either need 4x4 or I don't.
Old 03-06-2018, 05:00 PM
  #30  
CF Veteran
 
Morat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Riding of Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,433
Received 67 Likes on 57 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Well for the OP - I haven't heard anything that would put me off a nice police package XJ. But you can always swap to a 231 if you prefer.

And I've learnt something about New Mexico


Quick Reply: 242 vs 231 build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.