am I the only one?
#1
Thread Starter
Seasoned Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Benton, KY
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
am I the only one?
Who prefers the look of the 84-96 front ends over the 97-01?
I always see threads where people want to convert to the 97-01 front end, but never see one where people want to convert a 97-01 to the 84-96 front....The 97-01's just dont look as "tough", they look to much like a car
I LOVE my 86, the front end will never be all round looking
I always see threads where people want to convert to the 97-01 front end, but never see one where people want to convert a 97-01 to the 84-96 front....The 97-01's just dont look as "tough", they look to much like a car
I LOVE my 86, the front end will never be all round looking
#7
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 1
From: Northern Vermont
Year: '89
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 242
EXACTLY!!! I dont understand why some people think its SO COOL to swap over to the newer style?!?!
I guess because they feel ashamed of owning something that old, pfft...Ide tell them to grow up.
So yeah, I like my XJ, un-rounded, same as you. And I proudly admit its an '89. I actually get alot of comments about how great a shape its in!
F*** those rounded bastards! .... IM KIDDING!!!
I guess because they feel ashamed of owning something that old, pfft...Ide tell them to grow up.
So yeah, I like my XJ, un-rounded, same as you. And I proudly admit its an '89. I actually get alot of comments about how great a shape its in!
F*** those rounded bastards! .... IM KIDDING!!!
Trending Topics
#8
Thread Starter
Seasoned Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Benton, KY
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
eh, mine has NO interior other than seats and a steering wheel, so I cannot comment on what MINE has in there, but, when it DID have interior, I do prefer the older setup.
#9
CF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
I don't really care what it looks like either, I just like cupholders, 29 spline 8.25's, non disconnect dana 30's... and a few other minor updates
#10
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
I like the look of my 96. I agree is looks a little more tough. I also don't think the side markers on the 97 and up, look like they belong. But, the cupholders I wouldn't mind along with the 29 spline 8.25" but my 8.25" holds up fine.
#12
CF Veteran
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 28,068
Likes: 6
From: Tenn. and Mich.
Year: 2004
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.7L V8
I think most people switch because it gives the impression of a newer vehicle. Plus they are easier to find parts for in good condition. IMO
Dan
Dan
#13
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
#15
Yah I would definitely agree with Donnie_K and 96Cherokee113 on the cupholder addition. That's one minor thing my 96 is lacking! Have any of you guys installed or designed a cupholder solution for 96 and under Cherokees?