Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Best year overall for Cherokee?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2009 | 06:51 PM
  #16  
itsanxjthing's Avatar
I like it in the dirt
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 1
From: Alberta Canada
Year: 2003
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by drummerwookie
i dont really trust those reviews bc you dont know how that jeep or those jeeps have been taken care of if rated badly

but, with 3 grand, you shouldnt have to much trouble finding a good reliable XJ with maybe as little as 100 thosand miles......maybe even less

i wouldnt by any older then 91......thats when the 4.0 recieved fuel injection...i think maybe they were TBI before...but i really wouldnt by any older then 1987.......thats bc from 84-86 they used the carbed 2.8 from the chevy S-10.......

but really, with 3 grand, like i said before i wouldnt be suprised if you found a 97 or 98 (first two years as the newer body design and duel airbags and updated interior)...

personally i like the older body design up to 96 more then the 97 and newer...i just like its boxier body style and more simple interior.......but soon ill get a 97 or newew since i now have the 93...

there really arent any packages to stay away from....they are all good.....

youve got the SE witch is the basic model that doesnt even have an RPM tach...or, depending on the year, the limited or country was the "nice" model....available with leather seats, even heated seats in the newer limiteds...

up thru 92, there was a laredo package that i like, but i kinda think they got a little chrome happy on that model......

and the most common package is the "sport" package wich is the best in my opinion.....has a more rugged look to it....flat black fender flares, althou i think it was 2000-01 where you could get matched painted fender flares with a gloss finish on the sport.....

also, i think it may be up until the late 80s, or early 90s, but some of the XJs had the puegot (spelling?) manual tranny...........stay away!

sorry i know that was kinda spotty, but i hope that helps
puegot tranny = bad news! however i have an 89 laredo with the IL 4.0 and guess what? fuel injected with the rail and everything, which is two years previous to 1991
Old 08-09-2009 | 12:37 AM
  #17  
dax702's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Ok, so XJ is the square boxier looking and ZJ looks closer to the ones you see today, though less round than today's. Which trim would you recommend for high mileage reliability? Also, do the seats fold forward for flat storage space in all the trims? I looked at a Montero but it only did 60/40 split, and on top of that, when you fold them forward, it didn't provide a flat space for your stuff..... I should mention that I will not be doing any offroading or "jeep" stuff; I need it purely for moving boxes of stuff to and fro..
Old 08-09-2009 | 10:47 AM
  #18  
itsanxjthing's Avatar
I like it in the dirt
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 1
From: Alberta Canada
Year: 2003
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

personally if you need it for me moving i would get a 4 door xj, rear seat folds down makes the same size as my s10 short box
Old 08-09-2009 | 04:08 PM
  #19  
OAS's Avatar
OAS
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

It's my understanding that the 4.0 engine block was reinforced in '95.
The unibody was strengthened in '96, and to a minor extent again in '97.
In late '99 (??) the 4.0 head was redisigned and had a tendency to crack around cylinder #3 (??).

Thus, i would say from '95 to '99 is good, with '96 being possibly the "best" year.
Just mho.
Old 08-09-2009 | 04:38 PM
  #20  
drummerwookie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by itsanxjthing
puegot tranny = bad news! however i have an 89 laredo with the IL 4.0 and guess what? fuel injected with the rail and everything, which is two years previous to 1991
oh my bad....i didnt think they went to full on fuel injection until the wrangler started getting the 4.0 which was 91

i know in 87, when they first started with the 4.0, it was only 177 HP...

yep, just looked it up, it was a sequential multi-point fuel injection system from the time it was started in 87....my mistake
Old 08-09-2009 | 07:23 PM
  #21  
dax702's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

I think we found the one we're going to get, original owners. If it drives as good as it looks, should be good to go, going to see it in one hour:

http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/cto/1312716303.html

Any advice on what to look for?
Old 08-09-2009 | 10:09 PM
  #22  
29erPilot's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

I'm also thinking of buying a Cherokee.I want it for mostly short trips and wheeling on the weekends.I found a 96 and 98.Any sugestions on the better deal?I had a 97 Wrangler with 33's but also added two children,wife and dog.


http://indianapolis.craigslist.org/cto/1314183354.html


http://indianapolis.craigslist.org/cto/1313157867.html
Old 09-20-2009 | 04:31 PM
  #23  
roger's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: davenport IA
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by dax702
I'm looking to purchase a Jeep Cherokee in the $3000 price range so obviously it will be high mileage and older. For the gurus of the forum, what years and/or trims should I stay away from? What is the best year overall? I was reading reviews on autos.msn.com and 1997 got the highest rating but I don't know how accurate those things can be...
Thanks
i have a 1997 grand cherokee laredo.it has selec trac.i love it.i have a 2000 blazer the 4x4 in it sucks.the blazer has nothing on the cherokee.the cherokee will go places the blazer cant
Old 09-20-2009 | 04:43 PM
  #24  
mobilecherokee4's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 1
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

99' is the best
Old 09-20-2009 | 11:57 PM
  #25  
Kyle0614's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by ktmracer419
84-86= garbage
87-90 received the fuel injected inline 6 and a decent auto transmission. the ba-10's are less than desirable but will get the job done. if you are lucky you will find a dana44 rearend
91 brought the more powerful, simpler "high output" 4.0 liter. also a 23 spline tranmission output as opposed to the older 21 spline. no more vacuum disconnect front axle. also the stronger 8.25 became the polular rear axle(as opposed to a dana35 found in most predecesssors
94-95 brought some minor changes in body strength, doors have more support. i beleive in 95 the larger u joints in front axle were introduced (previous to this all earlier xj's equipped with abs had the larger u joint)
96 also had minor changes in interior styling, nothing worth noting really late 96's had a higher spline count in the rear axle. obdII was introduced this year
97 had some significant changes. the basic body structure stayed the same, but a slightly more "rounded" body style. mainly noticed in the front header panel and rear hatch. interior sought major changes but mechanically still the same as a 96
in 99 the 4.0 had to conform to some stricter emissions regulations which resulted in lost power, but to make up for it a more efficient intake manifold was used, power is about the same compared to earlier models.
in 00 or 01 you got the distributorless ignition system (not good nor bad) a low pinion front axle, and a tentatively weaker head design (don't overheat it and you shouldnt worry)
Do you have a beef with 92'-93' year models? lol they don't exist in your XJ line up. Just kidding couldn't resist because I have 92' oh yea 98' too? were there just no changes at all I'm assuming?

Last edited by Kyle0614; 09-20-2009 at 11:58 PM. Reason: forgot something
Old 09-21-2009 | 12:37 AM
  #26  
Mr.JayDeeM's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, Va
Model: Cherokee
Default

Believe it or not, I paid only $2,900 out the door from a dealership in Delware. It only has 92k miles when I bought it last month. My favorite year would be 97-00. So, look around and wait for a good deal to come by. I waited 4 months for a good deal to come by like this one.

Old 09-21-2009 | 12:47 AM
  #27  
idahoblkss's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

dont know what u guys are talkin about, if it says jeep it good...lol
Old 09-21-2009 | 01:09 AM
  #28  
mobilecherokee4's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 1
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

haha good point....but we are talkin bout the "best" but yes very true if it says jeep its good lol
Old 09-21-2009 | 03:19 PM
  #29  
Kyle0614's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

i'd rather have the commander sitting beside the blue one those are freakin sweet hehe
Old 09-21-2009 | 03:31 PM
  #30  
bluebeast's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I would go 95 and newer i personally like the 97 and up body style.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.