Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Bilstien 5150's discontinued?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2012 | 04:20 PM
  #31  
NickH's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by JeepingDan
I'm thinking desert racing with the constant shock travel at high speeds.
Gotcha. Its no where near that. Lots of highway to my spots and then maybe some mild off-road or rutted up muddy access roads.
I have a elk hunt in Oct so I maybe in some rocks.
Old 06-08-2012 | 04:34 PM
  #32  
ktmracer419's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by NickH
My rig isn't a trail rig but a hunting rig. I don't hardcore off-road. So what do you consider quickly?
ive had 5150's get warm to the point where you cant hold your hand on it for more than a few seconds from just trailriding/rockcrawling

never really ever bothered to touch my shocks otherwise.

i never heard of how hot is too hot, but FOA shaft seals are rated for up to 250 degrees.
Old 06-08-2012 | 04:51 PM
  #33  
NickH's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Not trying to thread Jack but what would you recommend for my needs?
Old 06-08-2012 | 04:57 PM
  #34  
ktmracer419's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by NickH
Not trying to thread Jack but what would you recommend for my needs?
you don't need anything too fancy. a bilstein 5100-5125 sounds like a nice fit for what you do.
Old 06-08-2012 | 05:03 PM
  #35  
NickH's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Which would provide the best ride? 5100, 5125, 5150 emulsion 2.0? 6.5 LA on 33s
Old 06-08-2012 | 05:06 PM
  #36  
FisherXJ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Somerset,Kentucky
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

are bilstiens actually worth the money?
Old 06-08-2012 | 05:21 PM
  #37  
89eliminator's Avatar
aka Wade-O
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 10
From: IN
Year: 1989 Comanche
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by FisherXJ
are bilstiens actually worth the money?
yes
Old 06-08-2012 | 05:46 PM
  #38  
ktmracer419's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by NickH
Which would provide the best ride? 5100, 5125, 5150 emulsion 2.0? 6.5 LA on 33s
it really all comes down to valving.

the 5125 and 5150s are valved the same, they are equal, one just has the remote resivoir to keep it a little cooler. the 5100 is also comparable to them, although they are valved differently, and usually vehicle specific.

a 2.0 (be it fox, foa, bilsteins 7100, or whatever) gives you even more valving options, and a larger body and shaft. these are stronger and will stay cooler longer. these are also rebuidable if you ever choose to play with your valving.

if you are looking at bilstein, most people like the 255/70 valving for a multipurpose, street driven xj.

if you wheel often and beat on your rig fairly hard (not just speed, playing in the rocks). i would look into 2.0's for the stiffer valving options.

I never cared to put decent shocks on mine until i was finally talked into it and went for a pair of foa 2.0s and had them valved fairly harsh. much less bottoming out and a nicer ride on access roads, and helped keep the tires planted when using momentum on hillclimbs and whatnot. Street ride isnt as plush, but its far more controlled with less swaying and weight transfer.
Old 06-08-2012 | 05:48 PM
  #39  
JeepingDan's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,786
Likes: 13
From: CT.
Year: 88
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

Originally Posted by FisherXJ
are bilstiens actually worth the money?
From what I've read people are very happy with them and usually don't go back.
Old 06-08-2012 | 05:54 PM
  #40  
ktmracer419's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by JeepingDan
From what I've read people are very happy with them and usually don't go back.
once you go from a cheapo generic white body to a basic 51xx bilstein. you will be foolish to go back.
Old 06-08-2012 | 05:58 PM
  #41  
JeepingDan's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,786
Likes: 13
From: CT.
Year: 88
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

That's usually the case with everything I upgrade
Old 06-08-2012 | 06:01 PM
  #42  
NickH's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Nice...thank you!

Originally Posted by ktmracer419
it really all comes down to valving.

the 5125 and 5150s are valved the same, they are equal, one just has the remote resivoir to keep it a little cooler. the 5100 is also comparable to them, although they are valved differently, and usually vehicle specific.

a 2.0 (be it fox, foa, bilsteins 7100, or whatever) gives you even more valving options, and a larger body and shaft. these are stronger and will stay cooler longer. these are also rebuidable if you ever choose to play with your valving.

if you are looking at bilstein, most people like the 255/70 valving for a multipurpose, street driven xj.

if you wheel often and beat on your rig fairly hard (not just speed, playing in the rocks). i would look into 2.0's for the stiffer valving options.

I never cared to put decent shocks on mine until i was finally talked into it and went for a pair of foa 2.0s and had them valved fairly harsh. much less bottoming out and a nicer ride on access roads, and helped keep the tires planted when using momentum on hillclimbs and whatnot. Street ride isnt as plush, but its far more controlled with less swaying and weight transfer.
Old 06-08-2012 | 06:31 PM
  #43  
93XJLI's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 10
From: LI, NY
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, bolt ons for days...
Default

Originally Posted by NickH
My rig isn't a trail rig but a hunting rig. I don't hardcore off-road. So what do you consider quickly?
A 10" 2.0 emulsion shock will heat up faster than a 10" 51xx series shock. Anything besides slow crawling or street driving will warm up an emulsion shock, fireroads at 20-30 would probably make the fluid cavitate. Emulsion means the fluid is mixed with the nitrogen, not that there just isn't a resivoir..Many of the shelf non resi shocks (like old man emu, bilstein 51xx, and I think some small shaft fox 2.0s) have an internal floating piston or IFP, that keeps the fluid separate from the gas. That's not saying those shocks can't overheat (bc they can, and do) but it takes longer. Shocks with a resivoir have more room for fluid and gas, so they are a "better" shock. And like Sam said, 5150s, 5125s, 7100s.. If they all have the same valving, you won't notice a difference until they start to heat up and the fluid gets bubbly.. Then they'll get softer until they cool down. I'm just using bilstein as an example bc everyone's familiar with them. The same would go for a fox 2.0 or a triple bypass king 4.0... Well, for the most part. If you want to learn more than I feel like typing on my phone go check out the shock/coilover bible on pirate
Old 06-08-2012 | 06:42 PM
  #44  
NickH's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Thanks for the info. Im hoping the 5150 are not discontinued.
Old 06-08-2012 | 06:54 PM
  #45  
Lucky Jeff's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 184
Likes: 3
From: Bonney Lake
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I bought 5150's back when they came out. They broke, and I found out it was a common problem. That was many years ago. I'm amazed people still don't know about the issue.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 AM.