Does downshifting reduce fuel milage?
#3
CF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 4
From: Flint/Asheville
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
I always down shift. The computer knows when its engine breaking and significantly reduces and amount of fuel sprayed into the motor. I always joke with friends that i get much better gas mileage in the mountains than i do in the flatlands.
Back when mine was 2wd i would get 21-23mpg, now i get 18-20mpg with 3.55 gears. Last trip i made to GA i got 21mpg again and i think it had alot to do with engine breaking down the inclines.
Plus I dont think I've every done a break job on a manual car I've owned.
Back when mine was 2wd i would get 21-23mpg, now i get 18-20mpg with 3.55 gears. Last trip i made to GA i got 21mpg again and i think it had alot to do with engine breaking down the inclines.
Plus I dont think I've every done a break job on a manual car I've owned.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 517
Likes: 1
From: Apollo, PA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Originally Posted by MonacaYankee
30$ brakes or a new transmission. I'll gladly use my brakes.
Sent from my DROID INCREDIBLE using Cherokee Forum
#7
CF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 4
From: Flint/Asheville
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Down shifting is just like up shifting, its not gonna ruin a trans.
The reason i down shift is so i dont have to come to a complete stop at red lights when i can help it. I always laugh at people, particularly women, who are either full throttle to the next red light then slams on their brakes, while i just slowly cruise by them as the light turns green. Coasting down inclines is fine when you dont have to stop at the bottom or dont start speeding up alot but downshift helps out alot on real steep hills/mountain.
I'm too lazy to search the webs for it now, I lost my bookmark somehow, but it was shown with lt1 sbc's that the duration that injectors are open during engine braking is less than that of idle. Which means its using less fuel. Might not be the same for all car makers. Although with modern cars using fully computerized systems, it makes sense for them to cut off fuel during engine breaking.
The reason i down shift is so i dont have to come to a complete stop at red lights when i can help it. I always laugh at people, particularly women, who are either full throttle to the next red light then slams on their brakes, while i just slowly cruise by them as the light turns green. Coasting down inclines is fine when you dont have to stop at the bottom or dont start speeding up alot but downshift helps out alot on real steep hills/mountain.
I'm too lazy to search the webs for it now, I lost my bookmark somehow, but it was shown with lt1 sbc's that the duration that injectors are open during engine braking is less than that of idle. Which means its using less fuel. Might not be the same for all car makers. Although with modern cars using fully computerized systems, it makes sense for them to cut off fuel during engine breaking.
Trending Topics
#8
CF Veteran
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 8
From: Georgia
Year: 99 94
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: I6
Originally Posted by TheJerm
Down shifting is just like up shifting, its not gonna ruin a trans.
The reason i down shift is so i dont have to come to a complete stop at red lights when i can help it. I always laugh at people, particularly women, who are either full throttle to the next red light then slams on their brakes, while i just slowly cruise by them as the light turns green. Coasting down inclines is fine when you dont have to stop at the bottom or dont start speeding up alot but downshift helps out alot on real steep hills/mountain.
I'm too lazy to search the webs for it now, I lost my bookmark somehow, but it was shown with lt1 sbc's that the duration that injectors are open during engine braking is less than that of idle. Which means its using less fuel. Might not be the same for all car makers. Although with modern cars using fully computerized systems, it makes sense for them to cut off fuel during engine breaking.
#9
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 1
From: South Dakota
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I'm talking about people who downshift on their way to a red light. The only time you might need to downshift is going down a mountain. With an auto tranny, they often jerk into gear while downshifting. I'd rather use my brakes and let it shift itself instead of forcing it. I feal that it increases the life of a tranny if the shifts are always nice and easy.
#10
CF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 4
From: Flint/Asheville
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
I'm talking about people who downshift on their way to a red light. The only time you might need to downshift is going down a mountain. With an auto tranny, they often jerk into gear while downshifting. I'd rather use my brakes and let it shift itself instead of forcing it. I feal that it increases the life of a tranny if the shifts are always nice and easy.
#11
I most deffinetly used Neutral in Boise last summer when stuck in traffic and not moving. Jeep was hot! and I needed to reduce load, helped some. I try to only downshift on a decent hill..... wear and tear on tranny and such
#12
Moved to chat.
Those who suggest doing it in an auto are crazy.
With a manual trans, you aren't putting any added stress on the trans, except for the syncros unless your not RPM matching. its the clutch and the rest of the driveline that would feel the stress. If you don't RPM match and you just dump the clutch, your forcing the syncros to do double duty, which will cause them to wear prematurely. Its also forcing the clutch to work extra hard as it has to slip a bit until the RPMs match the wheel speed.
If you don't RPM match to keep the stress off the driveline, then your tires are gonna bark, chewing the rubber early.
And I'm 99% sure that the injector pulse is SHUT OFF while under deceleration in an engine braking situation. Therefore getting VERY SLIGHTLY better gas mileage. But it equates out to be a fraction of a percent.
So you really won't notice the gas mileage at all.
Those who suggest doing it in an auto are crazy.
With a manual trans, you aren't putting any added stress on the trans, except for the syncros unless your not RPM matching. its the clutch and the rest of the driveline that would feel the stress. If you don't RPM match and you just dump the clutch, your forcing the syncros to do double duty, which will cause them to wear prematurely. Its also forcing the clutch to work extra hard as it has to slip a bit until the RPMs match the wheel speed.
If you don't RPM match to keep the stress off the driveline, then your tires are gonna bark, chewing the rubber early.
And I'm 99% sure that the injector pulse is SHUT OFF while under deceleration in an engine braking situation. Therefore getting VERY SLIGHTLY better gas mileage. But it equates out to be a fraction of a percent.
So you really won't notice the gas mileage at all.
#13
Yes, but there are instances that you NEED to down shift. case in point, the Rockies. You will ruin your breaks and possibly start a fire if you dont downshift in an auto
#14
It won't last long doing this on a daily basis. Unless built to do so, and the stockers aren't.
#15