Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Dyno Results, 4.6 Super-Stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2014, 07:44 PM
  #136  
CF Veteran
 
CobraMarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Default

FPR is in the gas tank, returnless system on these Jeeps.
MSD BTM will not work with computer controlled ignition timing, need to control the cam position sensor signal and the crank position sensor signal. have to do both and not just one or will get a CEL.


Those are both old methods to try and control fuel requirements and timing retard under boost. Both will not work with the Jeep 4.0. Older carb versions, regular distributor ignition and renix systems maybe.
Old 11-05-2014, 08:53 PM
  #137  
CF Veteran
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: central IN
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 1997
Engine: 4.0
Default

wow. just wow.

rumors of hpt releasing jtec support have been floating since May. that'd be the best tuning solution IMHO if it were available. this thread outlines, in fine detail, why I have opted not to mod the jeep beyond a hot air intake. not to mention I dont have thousands of dollars lying around to burn.
Old 11-05-2014, 09:10 PM
  #138  
Junior Member
 
rch10007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Did megasquirt ever get mentioned on this forum?
Old 11-05-2014, 09:36 PM
  #139  
CF Veteran
 
CobraMarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Default

This thread outlines just how you can't just 'throw a turbo or supercharger on it'. It's not that easy if you don't know how or what you are exactly doing. Most every thread where someone thinks that they 'can do it', all fail. There are ways to do it easily but everyone 'has better ideas' on how to do it. Unless you have actually done it, it is hard to give advice on what works. I agree that there are many ways to do the same thing, but support on these 'other ways' is lacking.


If you drive a supercharged XJ you will be amazed and sold.
Free rides always available in Philadelphia area.

Last edited by CobraMarty; 11-06-2014 at 05:28 AM.
Old 11-06-2014, 08:08 AM
  #140  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
CoffeeCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
Default

... so they mounted the wideband 02 2 feet downstream of the catalytic converter. Thoughts?
Old 11-06-2014, 08:17 AM
  #141  
Junior Member
 
rch10007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by CoffeeCommando
... so they mounted the wideband 02 2 feet downstream of the catalytic converter. Thoughts?
Does it get hot enough that far out to even produce a reliable signal?
Old 11-06-2014, 10:31 AM
  #142  
Member
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by CobraMarty
FPR is in the gas tank, returnless system on these Jeeps.
MSD BTM will not work with computer controlled ignition timing, need to control the cam position sensor signal and the crank position sensor signal. have to do both and not just one or will get a CEL.


Those are both old methods to try and control fuel requirements and timing retard under boost. Both will not work with the Jeep 4.0. Older carb versions, regular distributor ignition and renix systems maybe.
If you can add forced induction to a vehicle, you can convert to return-style fueling. Not terribly hard.

MSD BTM absolutely works with computer controlled ignition timing. Been done on thousands of vehicles.

Does it work well? No. It's an old method. Just like a 7th injector and messing around with a stock ECU and map clamps.

Originally Posted by s346k
wow. just wow.

rumors of hpt releasing jtec support have been floating since May. that'd be the best tuning solution IMHO if it were available. this thread outlines, in fine detail, why I have opted not to mod the jeep beyond a hot air intake. not to mention I dont have thousands of dollars lying around to burn.
Sounds fun.

Originally Posted by rch10007
Did megasquirt ever get mentioned on this forum?
A few times. I mentioned it, and the XJ-R runs it with great success. Pretty simple. I have two vehicles that run it.

Originally Posted by CoffeeCommando
... so they mounted the wideband 02 2 feet downstream of the catalytic converter. Thoughts?
Thoughts? Stupid. Should be near the collector.

Originally Posted by rch10007
Does it get hot enough that far out to even produce a reliable signal?
Widebands don't measure heat. They have built in heater circuits.
Old 11-06-2014, 10:56 AM
  #143  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
CoffeeCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404

Thoughts? Stupid. Should be near the collector.
I'm having them relocate it to before the collector and installing a second one for the other collector since it's a 2000 with 2 catalytic converters after the collectors on the down-pipe.

Originally Posted by s346k
wow. just wow.

rumors of hpt releasing jtec support have been floating since May. that'd be the best tuning solution IMHO if it were available. this thread outlines, in fine detail, why I have opted not to mod the jeep beyond a hot air intake. not to mention I dont have thousands of dollars lying around to burn.
30 months in Afghanistan as a contractor has given me a serious financial boost. The reasons I didn't start this myself in my garage is because I suck ***** at soldering, I have no skills in welding, with the sounds emanating from inside the engine I didn't know what to expect, and even with a cherry picker there is no space for me in my garage to use it.

I also didn't want to spend months of all of my spare time picking away at it. In hindsight I'm glad I handed it over to them still because of all of the other things they found that I might have missed in the process even if I had the capabilities to do it myself.
Old 11-06-2014, 11:03 AM
  #144  
Member
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

My bad, forgot it was a 2000.

They make dual-channel wideband kits that would probably be good for what you're doing, but also gross overkill.

I'd put it as far forward as you can once the exhaust turns into a single pipe. On this low boost with your tuning solution, don't suppose it matters a whole lot of it's after a cat.
Old 11-07-2014, 06:37 AM
  #145  
CF Veteran
 
CobraMarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Default

$400 for a MSD BTM + harness and limited/primitive linear control over timing retard vs. the Split Second Control box where you have full program-ability with rpm/boost table.
$200 for a FMU + fuel lines and + rerouting for a return fuel line + need larger fuel pump to be able to supply the higher fuel psi and fuel volume.
I've had poor reliability with MSD over the past 30 years. Don't want failure in this part.

I'll stick with Split Second FTC-1 Control box. Less $, reliable, proven over 90+ Jeep 4.0 installs. It is really a 'standalone' computer for control of the 7th injector. It is plug-n-play, has it's own MAP sensor and gets signals and power from the stock harness. It is a 'piggyback' for the timing retard as it intercepts the cam and crank position sensors and retards those signals also fully programmable with rpm/boost table.
Old 11-07-2014, 09:57 AM
  #146  
CF Veteran
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: central IN
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 1997
Engine: 4.0
Default

seems like a awful lot of work to still get drug by a camry on the interstate.
Old 11-07-2014, 10:48 AM
  #147  
Member
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by CobraMarty
$400 for a MSD BTM + harness and limited/primitive linear control over timing retard vs. the Split Second Control box where you have full program-ability with rpm/boost table.
$200 for a FMU + fuel lines and + rerouting for a return fuel line + need larger fuel pump to be able to supply the higher fuel psi and fuel volume.
I've had poor reliability with MSD over the past 30 years. Don't want failure in this part.

I'll stick with Split Second FTC-1 Control box. Less $, reliable, proven over 90+ Jeep 4.0 installs. It is really a 'standalone' computer for control of the 7th injector. It is plug-n-play, has it's own MAP sensor and gets signals and power from the stock harness. It is a 'piggyback' for the timing retard as it intercepts the cam and crank position sensors and retards those signals also fully programmable with rpm/boost table.
You can get a BTM and FMU all day lightly used for $200 for the combo. Because they suck, and nobody uses them anymore.

I know the SS is proven and such, but i just can't wrap my brain around spending many thousands of dollars on a stroker motor, adding forced induction, and leaving the stock ecu anywhere near the thing.

That's my only point. If it works, it works, but end result, you're leaving power, efficiency, and safety on the table going with anything other than a standalone ECU. And that's not something that can be argued. Additional injector setups were commonly used in the 80s and 90s because that's what was good back then. (Greddy Rebic, HKS AIC, PFC FCON, GCC, EGC, etc) They aren't used anymore because this sort of thing is two decades outdated.

I know you have some stake in the Split Second being awesome and all that, and i'm not trying to beat you up over it. I hope it works out great for OP, because i'm really interested to see what this thing does once it's sorted.
Old 11-07-2014, 12:21 PM
  #148  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
CoffeeCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
Default

I still need to order that injector. It totally slipped off of my radar somehow. Any idea what kind it is Marty? I know Sprintex is in Australia and they're about 14 hours ahead so it's 2:30 AM saturday there now.

Last edited by CoffeeCommando; 11-07-2014 at 12:29 PM.
Old 11-07-2014, 12:27 PM
  #149  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
CoffeeCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
Default

Originally Posted by s346k
seems like a awful lot of work to still get drug by a camry on the interstate.
It doesn't matter what you drive there's always something faster. I'd prefer it to last at least another 100K miles versus being a little faster and wiping out another cam lobe after a few thousand miles. Been there done that twice. That sucks far more than watching a little 2000 lb car with a 6 speed transmission out run me. ... if it can.

Originally Posted by concealer404
You can get a BTM and FMU all day lightly used for $200 for the combo. Because they suck, and nobody uses them anymore.

I know the SS is proven and such, but i just can't wrap my brain around spending many thousands of dollars on a stroker motor, adding forced induction, and leaving the stock ecu anywhere near the thing.

That's my only point. If it works, it works, but end result, you're leaving power, efficiency, and safety on the table going with anything other than a standalone ECU. And that's not something that can be argued. Additional injector setups were commonly used in the 80s and 90s because that's what was good back then. (Greddy Rebic, HKS AIC, PFC FCON, GCC, EGC, etc) They aren't used anymore because this sort of thing is two decades outdated.

I know you have some stake in the Split Second being awesome and all that, and i'm not trying to beat you up over it. I hope it works out great for OP, because i'm really interested to see what this thing does once it's sorted.
It's going to blast a Camry out of the water on the interstate, then pull off on a dirt road and climb a mountain afterwards while there's a rainbow in the sky and angels are singing.
Old 11-07-2014, 01:29 PM
  #150  
CF Veteran
 
CobraMarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
You can get a BTM and FMU all day lightly used for $200 for the combo. Because they suck, and nobody uses them anymore.
Absolutely, but back when EFI started before there were electronic wizards, everyone still thought mechanical like carbs and rising rate FMUs were born. I used them at the time. Even before them was the MSD BTM useful on roots SC engines that wanted more than just lock the ignition and advance at 20*.

Originally Posted by concealer404
I know the SS is proven and such, but i just can't wrap my brain around spending many thousands of dollars on a stroker motor, adding forced induction, and leaving the stock ecu anywhere near the thing.
Unfortunately today with OBD/emission/smog checks and inspections cat converters, etc, on a DD which is legal, you are pretty stuck with the stock ECU.
Only a few aftermarket/standalone ECUs even support OBD2. And there are currently no aftermarket/standalone ECUs that are plug and play, already programmed, OBD2, direct replacement for the Jeep 4.0. Offroad racers and JeepSpeed types have all the options available.

Originally Posted by concealer404
Additional injector setups were commonly used in the 80s and 90s because that's what was good back then. (Greddy Rebic, HKS AIC, PFC FCON, GCC, EGC, etc) They aren't used anymore because this sort of thing is two decades outdated.
And our Jeeps are from the 80s and 90s and require 80s and 90s thinking/technology to get them to work.
Unfortunately we can't use today's tuning strategies on them. Sure it would be nice if EFIlive, etc supported the Jeeps. Everything is a compromise. The Jeep ECU can be tuned using SCT products but so far only one guy does it by mail and $$. And you have a very small resolution window to spread now over the boost area. Resolution example like every 1000 rpm and not 100 rpm.

Originally Posted by concealer404
I know you have some stake in the Split Second being awesome and all that, and i'm not trying to beat you up over it.
I don't have any stake in Split Second. He was the only one willing to try something different. I looked at the AEM FIC and have 2 units sitting on the shelf. I didn't like how they only modify an ecu generated injector pulse width either + or - and don't actually program the pulse width you really want.

Yep the Jeeps aren't the fastest, run hot, last 200k+ miles, need low rpm grunt and will never win a HP or efficiency/mpg war. They are what they are. Some just like to make them a bit better at what they are.


Quick Reply: Dyno Results, 4.6 Super-Stroker



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.