Dyno Results, 4.6 Super-Stroker
#256
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Great news. After talking to RR I decided to put the recirc back at the TB so that it could let off the decelleration boost (what little there was only at WoT). There was no change in the boost.
Then I decided to put it back where Sprintex designed it to be. When I did that, if I gave it a small punch at cruising, when the RPM's shot up the boost actually correlated. I get 1 - 1.5 PSI boost when I give it immediate throttle while cruising and it holds, or tapers down to, 1 PSI thereafter until I ease off the throttle.
Just for the hell of it when I parked it at the house I floored it. It jumped up to 4.7 PSI. Looks like leaving it exactly where it's designed to be is better than any other location, just the intake needed to be upgraded to match. Considering that's the boost of a fully heated up engine, a 15.51% increase would translate to 5.4 PSI. I will be happy with this future number.
I still have the supercharger whine while driving regardless of boost.
Full throttle boost numbers are still the same.
RR said it would be $100 for a pulley. He's looking at the pictures I took to determine which model of pulley fits my application ATM.
Then I decided to put it back where Sprintex designed it to be. When I did that, if I gave it a small punch at cruising, when the RPM's shot up the boost actually correlated. I get 1 - 1.5 PSI boost when I give it immediate throttle while cruising and it holds, or tapers down to, 1 PSI thereafter until I ease off the throttle.
Just for the hell of it when I parked it at the house I floored it. It jumped up to 4.7 PSI. Looks like leaving it exactly where it's designed to be is better than any other location, just the intake needed to be upgraded to match. Considering that's the boost of a fully heated up engine, a 15.51% increase would translate to 5.4 PSI. I will be happy with this future number.
I still have the supercharger whine while driving regardless of boost.
Full throttle boost numbers are still the same.
RR said it would be $100 for a pulley. He's looking at the pictures I took to determine which model of pulley fits my application ATM.
Last edited by CoffeeCommando; 02-09-2015 at 12:45 PM.
#258
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
#259
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
While you are waiting for the smaller pulley, Otherwise, how is it doing? Daily driving it? miles? performance as it is? max boost as is? Just give us followers an update as to how it is doing and your findings over the last month.
#260
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
58mm = 2.28" 6.375" = 2.79:1 x2 x59CID = 329CID /280CID stroker x14.7 = 2.57 pounds boost
49mm = 1.93" 6.375" = 3.30:1 x2 x59CID = 389.7CID /280CID x14.7 = 5.75 pounds boost
That is ignoring efficencies, losses, etc. Compares are relative.
If you see with the 58mm you see 3.2 pounds boost, with the 49mm you will probably see 6.5 pounds boost,
49mm = 1.93" 6.375" = 3.30:1 x2 x59CID = 389.7CID /280CID x14.7 = 5.75 pounds boost
That is ignoring efficencies, losses, etc. Compares are relative.
If you see with the 58mm you see 3.2 pounds boost, with the 49mm you will probably see 6.5 pounds boost,
That being said your 2.57 prediction is spot on with what it consistently holds in WoT before the first downshift. I can only hope that 5.75 will be accurate as well.
Where did you get the math for these numbers?
It still drives as before as far as gas mileage, but it certainly accomplishes more acceleration with less effort regardless of boost or no boost.
I have and have had since the first time I relocated the BPV to the TB location, a CEL on deceleration. I owed it up to the fact that I switched the BPV location and it had already learned the engine operation and I had thrown a giant variable change into the vacuum portion of the equation; but after resetting the computer with the new location it persists.
It's a cylinder 3 and 4 misfire, and it blinks on and off whenever I reach over 50mph and let off the pedal completely. If I drive for a while doing 40-45 only or less the CEL goes away, but if I get over 50'ish and let off the pedal completely it comes back. It's completely unnoticeable as far as engine operation.
I even reset the comp. and put it back in the original location once and it still persisted.
#261
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Wierd at 50mph, Did you correct your speedo for the bigger tires? Check your speedo reading to actual gps. Get a gear for the SLE speedo drive to correct the reading if it is off.
'Formula' is just math and 40+ years of my experience, reading, figuring. I have been checking everyone's hp claims for years and comparing.
Your CEL on decel doesn't make sense. Always the same CEL code?
Misfires, check your plugs. Regap to 0.032"-0.035" to start.
I forget all your vacuum line routing. Any airleaks?
'Formula' is just math and 40+ years of my experience, reading, figuring. I have been checking everyone's hp claims for years and comparing.
Your CEL on decel doesn't make sense. Always the same CEL code?
Misfires, check your plugs. Regap to 0.032"-0.035" to start.
I forget all your vacuum line routing. Any airleaks?
#262
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Wierd at 50mph, Did you correct your speedo for the bigger tires? Check your speedo reading to actual gps. Get a gear for the SLE speedo drive to correct the reading if it is off.
'Formula' is just math and 40+ years of my experience, reading, figuring. I have been checking everyone's hp claims for years and comparing.
Your CEL on decel doesn't make sense. Always the same CEL code?
Misfires, check your plugs. Regap to 0.032"-0.035" to start.
I forget all your vacuum line routing. Any airleaks?
'Formula' is just math and 40+ years of my experience, reading, figuring. I have been checking everyone's hp claims for years and comparing.
Your CEL on decel doesn't make sense. Always the same CEL code?
Misfires, check your plugs. Regap to 0.032"-0.035" to start.
I forget all your vacuum line routing. Any airleaks?
Speedo is working just fine as it is. If it ain't broke I ain't fixing it! Unless there's an aftermarket hi-torque replacement for it. That's always been my motto.
I'm pretty OCD about comparing numbers and differences in things myself. I'm very scientific. I've even been called methodical and Krieger.
#263
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
There is no code for vacuum leak specifically.
The ecu and trans both need correct/accurate speedo reading when it compares values for in/out of range and CEL codes.
In a perfect world, doubling the ATM will double the power. So 14.7 +14.7 = 2x the power. Due to mechanical loss and inefficiencies I use 16 as the amount of increase in ATM to double the power. This has proven very accurate over the years. That is why 8 pounds of boost adds 8/16= 50% more power.
Another for the superchargers is the pressure ratio. Air being forced in / amount of air the engine would normally consume. Look at my example-
58mm = 2.28" 6.375" = 2.79:1 x2 x59CID = 329CID /280CID stroker x14.7 = 2.57 pounds boost
58mm S/C pulley = 2.28", 6.375(crank pulley)/2.28(SC pulley)=2.79:1 step up ratio(SC turns 2.79 times for every 1 crank rotation)
2.79 x2(#crank revolutuions/engine cycle) x 59CID(displacement of SC/rev) = 329CID
329CID(output of SC) / 280CID 'input'of stroker motor = 1.175 Pressure Ratio
1.175 - 1.0 = 0.175 additional pressure/ATM going into the engine
0.175 x 14.7(atm) = 2.57 is the amount of boost into the engine.
2.5 pounds actual vs 2.57 pounds calculated is close enough and within the resolution of the measuring devices
2.57 / 16 = 16% more power
You can also work the equation backwards to determine for a give /desired boost- supercharger size, SC pulley size or crank pulley size
The ecu and trans both need correct/accurate speedo reading when it compares values for in/out of range and CEL codes.
In a perfect world, doubling the ATM will double the power. So 14.7 +14.7 = 2x the power. Due to mechanical loss and inefficiencies I use 16 as the amount of increase in ATM to double the power. This has proven very accurate over the years. That is why 8 pounds of boost adds 8/16= 50% more power.
Another for the superchargers is the pressure ratio. Air being forced in / amount of air the engine would normally consume. Look at my example-
58mm = 2.28" 6.375" = 2.79:1 x2 x59CID = 329CID /280CID stroker x14.7 = 2.57 pounds boost
58mm S/C pulley = 2.28", 6.375(crank pulley)/2.28(SC pulley)=2.79:1 step up ratio(SC turns 2.79 times for every 1 crank rotation)
2.79 x2(#crank revolutuions/engine cycle) x 59CID(displacement of SC/rev) = 329CID
329CID(output of SC) / 280CID 'input'of stroker motor = 1.175 Pressure Ratio
1.175 - 1.0 = 0.175 additional pressure/ATM going into the engine
0.175 x 14.7(atm) = 2.57 is the amount of boost into the engine.
2.5 pounds actual vs 2.57 pounds calculated is close enough and within the resolution of the measuring devices
2.57 / 16 = 16% more power
You can also work the equation backwards to determine for a give /desired boost- supercharger size, SC pulley size or crank pulley size
Last edited by CobraMarty; 03-12-2015 at 06:40 AM.
#264
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Rick's going to give you a call soon about the 49mm pulley. he's afraid I'm going to overspin the blower. He's been so busy and it's been so long since I sent him the email I think he's completely forgotten about the numerical values I emailed him on the actual RPM's, and the fact that it's a continues rating (mine will only see brief spikes with the AW4)
#265
[QUO TE= CobraMarty;2995988]Theoretical/Predicted Boost-
The Sprintex 210 SC is on the 'small' size but works well.
Stock 4.0- 6.375" crank pulley / 2.5" SC pulley = 2.55 x 2(revs/engine cycle) = 5.1 x .94L = 4.794L / 3.956L(stock 4.0) = 1.212 pressure ratio -1 x 14.7(1ATM) = 3.11 pounds + inefficiency of flow of engine(fudge factor) add about +2pounds = 5 pounds boost actual seen
4.6L: 6.375"/2.5" x 2 x 0.94L = 4.794L / 4.6L = 1.042PR -1 x 14.7 = 0.62 pounds + inefficiency (fudge factor)+2 pounds = 0.62-2.6 pounds of boost actual seen
4.6L: 6.375"/2.25" x 2 x 0.94L = 5.33L / 4.6L = 1.158PR -1 x 14.7 = 2.32 pounds + inefficiency (fudge factor)+2 pounds = 2.32-4.32 pounds of boost actual seen
4.6L: 6.375"/2.00" x 2 x 0.94L = 5.99L / 4.6L = 1.303PR -1 x 14.7 = 4.45 pounds + inefficiency (fudge factor)+2 pounds = 4.45-6.45 pounds of boost actual seen
We run a 47mm(1.85") SC pulley.
So what size pulley do you order?
Try 'Pulley Boys' in FL, might need to send them your pulley to measure.[/QUOTE]
can you put as a link For the pulley sizes that we can purchase From pulley boys I have the same superstars and I have a problem please help me
The Sprintex 210 SC is on the 'small' size but works well.
Stock 4.0- 6.375" crank pulley / 2.5" SC pulley = 2.55 x 2(revs/engine cycle) = 5.1 x .94L = 4.794L / 3.956L(stock 4.0) = 1.212 pressure ratio -1 x 14.7(1ATM) = 3.11 pounds + inefficiency of flow of engine(fudge factor) add about +2pounds = 5 pounds boost actual seen
4.6L: 6.375"/2.5" x 2 x 0.94L = 4.794L / 4.6L = 1.042PR -1 x 14.7 = 0.62 pounds + inefficiency (fudge factor)+2 pounds = 0.62-2.6 pounds of boost actual seen
4.6L: 6.375"/2.25" x 2 x 0.94L = 5.33L / 4.6L = 1.158PR -1 x 14.7 = 2.32 pounds + inefficiency (fudge factor)+2 pounds = 2.32-4.32 pounds of boost actual seen
4.6L: 6.375"/2.00" x 2 x 0.94L = 5.99L / 4.6L = 1.303PR -1 x 14.7 = 4.45 pounds + inefficiency (fudge factor)+2 pounds = 4.45-6.45 pounds of boost actual seen
We run a 47mm(1.85") SC pulley.
So what size pulley do you order?
Try 'Pulley Boys' in FL, might need to send them your pulley to measure.[/QUOTE]
can you put as a link For the pulley sizes that we can purchase From pulley boys I have the same superstars and I have a problem please help me
#267
Good day CobraMarty
Sprintex SuperCharger kit for the XJ
my XJ is 1997
and S/C pulley size is the one that came whet the Sprintex SuperCharger kit
the XJ Engine is
JEEP 4.6L or 4.7L STAGE 3 STROKER KIT/ with all upgrades -
Scat 9000 series crankshaft
Scat I-beam Forged Rods w/. 8740 Rod bolts
Clevite rod
Clevite Main Bearings
Hasting Moly Rings
IC944 ICON Forged Pistons .030
1,354.00 1,354.00T
6- Fuel Injectors (24LB)
AndCOMP Cams
Basic Operating RPM Range:1,000-5,200
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift:210
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift:218
Duration at 050 inch Lift:210 int./218 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration:254
Advertised Exhaust Duration:262
Advertised Duration:254 int./262 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio:0.477 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio:0.493 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio:0.477 int./0.493 exh.
Lobe Separation (degrees):111
And Rocker Arms
Harland Sharp Original Roller Rockers
Rocker Arm Ratio:1.6
Rocker Arm Style:Full roller
Stud Size:5/16 in.
And aJeep 4.0L Stage 3 Ported Head w/ Oversized Valves
Valve seats are opened up to accommodate large intake (2.0 in.) and exhaust valves (1.551 in.).
And Painless Performance PERFECT Hi-Velocity Throttle Bodies
Venturi Diameter (mm): 68.00mm
This is the problem
#269
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Is that just for your 4.6L stroker and NO supercharger?
What is the difference between the different runs? Anything?
YOU- 159,171,186,191 HP / 223/231/252/253 TQ
These numbers are right in line with what I have seem from others. See-
http://jeepm62superchargerkit.blogsp...g-page_15.html
156rwhp/266rwtq corrected*(173rwhp/295rwtq Dynojet) 4.7L Stroker '98 XJ
185rwhp/241rwtq 4.6L Stroker 9.56:1 0.043"quench stock head +5-6*timing mod 63mmTB 24lb injectors Hesco474/480 cam ?dyno correction 204rwhp/265rwtq
193rwhp/236rwtq ?dyno, 'Gradon's Stroker' from old post, 4.6L, 30cam, ported head
202rwhp/258rwtq Dastek dyno, 'Cheromaniac's' '92 4.6L 'poor man's Stroker' '01 intake 65mmTB 9.25:1 ported head 5sp header
What is the difference between the different runs? Anything?
YOU- 159,171,186,191 HP / 223/231/252/253 TQ
These numbers are right in line with what I have seem from others. See-
http://jeepm62superchargerkit.blogsp...g-page_15.html
156rwhp/266rwtq corrected*(173rwhp/295rwtq Dynojet) 4.7L Stroker '98 XJ
185rwhp/241rwtq 4.6L Stroker 9.56:1 0.043"quench stock head +5-6*timing mod 63mmTB 24lb injectors Hesco474/480 cam ?dyno correction 204rwhp/265rwtq
193rwhp/236rwtq ?dyno, 'Gradon's Stroker' from old post, 4.6L, 30cam, ported head
202rwhp/258rwtq Dastek dyno, 'Cheromaniac's' '92 4.6L 'poor man's Stroker' '01 intake 65mmTB 9.25:1 ported head 5sp header
#270
Good day CobraMarty
I need at least 700HP and 700 TQ for a Sand Dune Hill Climb if you can help me I want to participate in this contest in my xj i need you as my mentor
For this Project I know I need a lot of things to buy
This is what i will encounter in the competition see the link