Ifs vs solid axle
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Ifs vs solid axle
So before you tell me to go google the difference between the two, i already have. I understand the difference between solid axle and IFS, but i dont understand why you cant get as much flex out of an independent suspension set up. What exactly limits the articulation? Are there ways to get more flex out of an IFS? Can you rock crawl with IFS? Thanks
#2
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
16 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: Golen 4.6L
It's easier to just show you.
Solid axle:
Independent suspension:
The solid axle has much more freedom of movement because it's longer and can pivot from its entire length. Those short suspension arms just can't move as much.
Solid axle:
Independent suspension:
The solid axle has much more freedom of movement because it's longer and can pivot from its entire length. Those short suspension arms just can't move as much.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
The ifs is limited on travel since the parts are attached to the frame where the suspension mounts (a arms?)
Solid axles ftw!
Solid axles ftw!
Last edited by crabmushrooms5; 11-09-2014 at 07:19 PM.
#4
Not to mention that with an ifs when a tire compresses or stuffs, you lose cclearance. With a straight axle you gain clearance.
Not that you couldn't make its work well, but usually it works best in racing.
Not that you couldn't make its work well, but usually it works best in racing.
#6
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boston
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Litre
Doesn't the solid axle also act as more of a pivot meaning as the left wheel goes up, the right wheel gets pushed down? Where on an independent system they act...well... Independently of each other.
#7
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Ifs is great on road,Off road only time it shines is high speed desert racing.You can rock crawl anything to a point.The best ifs off road will be the ford ttb 80-96 its more like a solid axle that bends in the middle.The rest of the ifs is more car like with upper and lower a arms which will limit the flex.The other thing ifs has more parts so more things that could break.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Ifs is great on road,Off road only time it shines is high speed desert racing.You can rock crawl anything to a point.The best ifs off road will be the ford ttb 80-96 its more like a solid axle that bends in the middle.The rest of the ifs is more car like with upper and lower a arms which will limit the flex.The other thing ifs has more parts so more things that could break.
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Done some research on the ford ttb axle. I noticed that some were leaf sprung and some were coil sprung. Were both those options offered? Did that axle ever come factory as a rear axle?
#12
::Regional Moderator::
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Over here...
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
There were two different options for the the full size trucks.
The F150's had a D44 and the F-250's could be had with either. D44 or D50. The F-350's had the D50 through 80-85.5 and then they brought back the D60. The compact trucks (ranger, bII, explorer) came with a D28 and later the D35. Ford has used the twin I-beam setup since the 60's on their 2wd trucks.
The F150's had a D44 and the F-250's could be had with either. D44 or D50. The F-350's had the D50 through 80-85.5 and then they brought back the D60. The compact trucks (ranger, bII, explorer) came with a D28 and later the D35. Ford has used the twin I-beam setup since the 60's on their 2wd trucks.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Escalon, Ca
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4litre
I used to wheel a 04' TRD Tacoma, great little truck.
3" lift, 33's, rear E locker, sliders and undercarriage armor. It's was an all around fantastic truck off road, except for the rocks.
You really can't lock most IFS because the shafts break like they are made from fragile glass, the flex is very limited even with long arms, and the sub frame the front suspension bolts to seem to get hung up on everything.
My XJ with 31's and open diffs will walk right over obstacles that my Tacoma with 33's and a rear locker had a difficult time with.
That being said, that same Tacoma was a blast at the dunes. I took great joy in pulling out stuck Superduty's and HD chevy's, mashing around in 2wd, and climbing hills in reverse that brought my buddies big douchey wheel hopping diesels to a stop.
They both have advantages and disadvantages, I currently want to explore the High Sierras and the XJ is better for that.
3" lift, 33's, rear E locker, sliders and undercarriage armor. It's was an all around fantastic truck off road, except for the rocks.
You really can't lock most IFS because the shafts break like they are made from fragile glass, the flex is very limited even with long arms, and the sub frame the front suspension bolts to seem to get hung up on everything.
My XJ with 31's and open diffs will walk right over obstacles that my Tacoma with 33's and a rear locker had a difficult time with.
That being said, that same Tacoma was a blast at the dunes. I took great joy in pulling out stuck Superduty's and HD chevy's, mashing around in 2wd, and climbing hills in reverse that brought my buddies big douchey wheel hopping diesels to a stop.
They both have advantages and disadvantages, I currently want to explore the High Sierras and the XJ is better for that.
Last edited by Gary Briggs; 11-11-2014 at 11:10 AM. Reason: I'm a terrible speller
#14
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Only thing a irs is good for is a smoother ride.Racing they use to be better but now with a solid axle and a 3 link it will out handle a irs.Off road a irs would be useless they have no ground clearance and lack flex and more moving parts to fail.
#15
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Purcellville, Virginia
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: '95
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
IFS can be made to have lots of travel, it's just not cheap.
The only time IFS has any advantage over solid axles are in high-speed applications. Most desert trucks are not 4wd, as CV shafts are very weak, and really limit travel.
Not to mention 4wd IFS has more components to fail, trouble keeping alignment, crappy steering, and just generally can't hold up to the abuse of oversized tires.
The only time IFS has any advantage over solid axles are in high-speed applications. Most desert trucks are not 4wd, as CV shafts are very weak, and really limit travel.
Not to mention 4wd IFS has more components to fail, trouble keeping alignment, crappy steering, and just generally can't hold up to the abuse of oversized tires.