Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Jeep ruining another icon safe to say Jeep is dead

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2013 | 11:33 PM
  #31  
jake92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 797
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville, FL
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by glass3222
I remember hearing all of these:

In 1984 the XJ came out.....Jeep is ruined, a unibody car....will never survive off road....what are they thinking.

In 1987 the Wrangler YJ came out....real jeeps have round headlights, what a yuppie jeep, it will never be able to go off road....what are they thinking

In 1997 the Wrangler TJ came out....coil springs on a jeep...can never be as rugged as leaf spring...will never handle the abuse off road....what are they thinking

Now the xj is beloved and has proven to be capable and durable, not ruining jeep. The YJ, has been used and abused everywhere off road. The TJ proved that coils are possibly more capable off road and handle the abuse....what is jeep thinking??????
Right,

But those where in house ideas not "let's rebadge something and call it a Jeep."
Old 12-23-2013 | 11:37 PM
  #32  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 13
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by glass3222
I remember hearing all of these:

In 1984 the XJ came out.....Jeep is ruined, a unibody car....will never survive off road....what are they thinking.

In 1987 the Wrangler YJ came out....real jeeps have round headlights, what a yuppie jeep, it will never be able to go off road....what are they thinking

In 1997 the Wrangler TJ came out....coil springs on a jeep...can never be as rugged as leaf spring...will never handle the abuse off road....what are they thinking

Now the xj is beloved and has proven to be capable and durable, not ruining jeep. The YJ, has been used and abused everywhere off road. The TJ proved that coils are possibly more capable off road and handle the abuse....what is jeep thinking??????
Did you actually LOOK at the pictures of the new thing or did you click the thread title and then "Post Reply" immediately? Come on dude...
Old 12-23-2013 | 11:42 PM
  #33  
jake92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 797
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville, FL
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by salad
Did you actually LOOK at the pictures of the new thing or did you click the thread title and then "Post Reply" immediately? Come on dude...
x2

This isn't a KL thread where yes it's an Alfa, but Jeep designed a lot of parts and sytems.

This POS on the other hand is a Fiat 500 with some KL powertrain parts and theories.

Not like when the XJ came out
Old 12-23-2013 | 11:50 PM
  #34  
glass3222's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Central PA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by salad
Did you actually LOOK at the pictures of the new thing or did you click the thread title and then "Post Reply" immediately? Come on dude...
Originally Posted by jake92
x2

This isn't a KL thread where yes it's an Alfa, but Jeep designed a lot of parts and sytems.

This POS on the other hand is a Fiat 500 with some KL powertrain parts and theories.

Not like when the XJ came out
Yes I did. All I was saying is that anytime something changes, it is always the downfall of the company. In 10 or 20 years we will see how it all shakes out. These new vehicles by Jeep may ruin Jeep, but only time will tell.
Old 12-24-2013 | 12:14 AM
  #35  
highmileage's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield CA
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by jake92
x2

This isn't a KL thread where yes it's an Alfa, but Jeep designed a lot of parts and sytems.

This POS on the other hand is a Fiat 500 with some KL powertrain parts and theories.

Not like when the XJ came out

NOT DEFENDING FIAT FOR TRYING.......

Point, our beloved XJ was based on the Eagle platform(Gremlin,Pacer,AMX) which in a round about way was loosely based on a Renault car from the 70s', and we all know what great vehicles Renaults were...LOL
The XJ had a shady start too, but that fiat thing is an abomination I'd rather have an ARO.
Old 12-24-2013 | 10:06 AM
  #36  
priell3's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA
Year: 2014
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.4 L
Default

Originally Posted by highmileage
NOT DEFENDING FIAT FOR TRYING.......

Point, our beloved XJ was based on the Eagle platform(Gremlin,Pacer,AMX) which in a round about way was loosely based on a Renault car from the 70s', and we all know what great vehicles Renaults were...LOL
The XJ had a shady start too, but that fiat thing is an abomination I'd rather have an ARO.
Everthing that has come out called "Jeep" over the past several decades gets bashed one way or another. Jeep is a division of one of many automobile companies fighting for a piece of the global pie. They must adapt or die.

It looks like the "Jeepster" is tailored to a specific market and I wish it success for the greater good of the company.
Old 12-24-2013 | 10:40 AM
  #37  
BimmerJeeper's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 2
From: USA
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L i6
Default

Originally Posted by glass3222
I remember hearing all of these:

In 1984 the XJ came out.....Jeep is ruined, a unibody car....will never survive off road....what are they thinking.

In 1987 the Wrangler YJ came out....real jeeps have round headlights, what a yuppie jeep, it will never be able to go off road....what are they thinking

In 1997 the Wrangler TJ came out....coil springs on a jeep...can never be as rugged as leaf spring...will never handle the abuse off road....what are they thinking

Now the xj is beloved and has proven to be capable and durable, not ruining jeep. The YJ, has been used and abused everywhere off road. The TJ proved that coils are possibly more capable off road and handle the abuse....what is jeep thinking??????
What a great post.
This happens with every model of car, not just Jeep.
Old 12-24-2013 | 12:51 PM
  #38  
belstaff's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Rimrock AZ
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default Just a thought

Lets take this "pregnant mini ", let FIA homologate it for competition, form a team,& take it to DAKAR. If it preforms well against the Peterhansel-BMW minis & Robbie Gordon's Hummers, then we can call it a Jeep.


Until then its just an "F***ing Italian Attempted Transportation" or FIAT, better known as " Fix It Again Tony"


JMHO
Old 12-25-2013 | 12:24 AM
  #39  
pdowty68's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 486
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, New York
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6 (The best engine ever made)
Default

Originally Posted by motorcharge
It's not just demand but government safety, emissions, ect standards that burden manufacturers from doing specialty vehicles. CAFE fleet standards are why Jeep can't build Jeeps anymore (though Fiat does seem to be hell bent on ruining it more than they have to and even more so than Chrysler did) and **** like the 2014 Cherokee, Compass, ect have to exist in order for them to be able to produce the Wrangler still. Those same standards are why they had to kill the TJ along with the 4.0 and make the plastic monstrosity that is the JK.
the 4.0 isn't comparable to that minivan v6 in them now. I get mad telling people "they should've never stopped making that engine, that was a mistake!" I get all angry about it, and how the liberty "replaced" the cherokee, I don't think so! 4.0 forever! They will all be gone one day!
Old 12-25-2013 | 12:10 PM
  #40  
IslandCherokee's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

I was really hoping they'd build the Gladiator!
Old 12-25-2013 | 12:16 PM
  #41  
holycaveman's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,643
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by kgm
Brand allegiance is stupid anyway. Find a new cool truck, or build yoself a dune buggy.
Yea pretty much. Its a hunk of metal for pete's sake! LOL

Thats why I could care less what a person drives. I drive a 00 cherokee because it works for me. If you drive a yota, hummer, whatever. Good for you.

Lets wheel


Why drag cherokees down the road of HD. "that ain't no Harley!"

I think not. I left high school almost 30 years ago. Don't want to go back.
Old 12-25-2013 | 02:40 PM
  #42  
ctjeep's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by holycaveman
Yea pretty much. Its a hunk of metal for pete's sake! LOL

Thats why I could care less what a person drives. I drive a 00 cherokee because it works for me. If you drive a yota, hummer, whatever. Good for you.

Lets wheel


Why drag cherokees down the road of HD. "that ain't no Harley!"

I think not. I left high school almost 30 years ago. Don't want to go back.

LOL - right on holycaveman

I reached that stage (I actually lived long enough to collect some Social Security) where I just went back to a US manufactured vehicle ('14 GC diesel).
Obviously I'm not emotionally invested in this discussion about Jeeps being 'real' or not. Like caveman, the decision to buy a certain vehicle has everything to do with my perceived needs. The last new US car I bought was an early 90's Cherokee - before that it was a '67 Mustang. For me it was always an issue of quality. I don't miss the days of buying a new domestic vehicle and keeping a list of all the defects for the 1st dealer servicing (final assembly after sale?).

This emotional attachment to a brand is something I'll never understand. I've ridden motorcycles for almost 50 years yet never owned a Harley. I used to own Nikon camera gear, now Canon, but I have a hard time understanding the irrational discussions on forums. I'm a believer of 'voting with my wallet'. If a manufacturer isn't making what I want I'll just find a different manufacturer. There are still plenty of choices in the world.

Lighten up - Life is short, Enjoy the ride!
Old 12-25-2013 | 02:48 PM
  #43  
cruiser54's Avatar
::CF Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,565
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by ctjeep
LOL - right on holycaveman

I reached that stage (I actually lived long enough to collect some Social Security) where I just went back to a US manufactured vehicle ('14 GC diesel).
Obviously I'm not emotionally invested in this discussion about Jeeps being 'real' or not. Like caveman, the decision to buy a certain vehicle has everything to do with my perceived needs. The last new US car I bought was an early 90's Cherokee - before that it was a '67 Mustang. For me it was always an issue of quality. I don't miss the days of buying a new domestic vehicle and keeping a list of all the defects for the 1st dealer servicing (final assembly after sale?).

This emotional attachment to a brand is something I'll never understand. I've ridden motorcycles for almost 50 years yet never owned a Harley. I used to own Nikon camera gear, now Canon, but I have a hard time understanding the irrational discussions on forums. I'm a believer of 'voting with my wallet'. If a manufacturer isn't making what I want I'll just find a different manufacturer. There are still plenty of choices in the world.

Lighten up - Life is short, Enjoy the ride!
Well stated.
Old 12-26-2013 | 01:38 PM
  #44  
belstaff's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Rimrock AZ
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default Agreement

Boy, do I agree with Caveman & CT,. My only stipulation is that it's made in America,I still believe in the American Dream & that the USA will always lead the way in innovation & quality.


Show me a 1940 Honda, Yamaha or Suzuki , maybe I'll change my mind but I know I can put my hands on a 40s, Harley or Indian. Same w/ Jeep, Ford, Chevy, Dodge, Plymouth, Hell even an ol De Soto (wow just showed my age) Point is I believe there will be XJs for a long time to come, that is if they aren't all cut up for rock crawlers, But , Hey, they will still be out there.
Old 12-26-2013 | 10:02 PM
  #45  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 13
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by belstaff
Boy, do I agree with Caveman & CT,. My only stipulation is that it's made in America
What do you think is American about modern automobiles?

Originally Posted by belstaff
I still believe in the American Dream
You must be referring to Wal-Mart and outsourcing, and the concentration of wealth into the pockets of private individuals filing taxes in Dublin and banking in the Bahamas?

Originally Posted by belstaff
that the USA will always lead the way in innovation & quality.
Which is why the US currently ranks 5th place (and declining) in overall global competitiveness, and quality of American STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education is 52nd place worldwide? Did you know that there are more foreign students studying in U.S. graduate schools than the number of American students, and over 2/3 of the engineers who receive Ph.D.’s from American universities are not United States citizens?

The America you're thinking of was divvied up and sold off a long time ago.

Anyway... what does this all have to do with a Fiat lol

Last edited by salad; 12-26-2013 at 10:27 PM.


Quick Reply: Jeep ruining another icon safe to say Jeep is dead



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.