Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Jeep's worst decision in the world

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2010, 06:50 PM
  #76  
CF Veteran
 
Donnie_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
Default

Originally Posted by Brett
this is what happens everytime an xj rapes a grand cherokee on the trail... one of these is born
tisk tisk... its sad aint it?
love this post!
Old 10-25-2016, 11:59 PM
  #77  
Member
 
Danny74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: upstate, New York
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 1991 I6 4.0 HO
Default

Originally Posted by RENIXBEAST
I think these should be produced from factory
Attachment 23106
Originally Posted by Johbby
WINNER!!!
I agree
Originally Posted by sgtskid
. . .
Those kits are bad ****....its too bad they are like 10 grand.

I wish they would make this.
+1
Originally Posted by _StationWagon_
Not legal for use in the USA.
Why not?
Old 10-26-2016, 12:05 AM
  #78  
CF Veteran
 
Evilpopcorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Converse, Texas
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Originally Posted by Danny74
I agree

+1


Why not?
There be forum necromancers at work here...
Old 10-26-2016, 04:44 AM
  #79  
Junior Member
 
AZ89Laredo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by Danny74
I agree

+1


Why not?
Someone dug deep for this one lol this thread is from 2010 lol
Old 10-26-2016, 08:08 AM
  #80  
Herp Derp Jerp
 
salad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Parham, ON
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by Danny74
I agree +1 Why not?
Echo...
Old 10-26-2016, 10:21 AM
  #81  
CF Veteran
 
aroundincircles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,377
Received 127 Likes on 99 Posts
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

The cherokee XJ could never pass current federal safety, emissions, fuel economy requirements, not to mention current mass consumer desires for on road comfort and electronic features. just trying to meet safety guidelines would increase the weight by probably 60% and would reduce the interior space to nothing OR make it a fat bloated thing that would hardly fit on trails.
Old 10-26-2016, 10:47 AM
  #82  
CF Veteran
 
1991Jeep_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fauquier County, Virginia
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Default

Originally Posted by aroundincircles
The cherokee XJ could never pass current federal safety, emissions, fuel economy requirements, not to mention current mass consumer desires for on road comfort and electronic features. just trying to meet safety guidelines would increase the weight by probably 60% and would reduce the interior space to nothing OR make it a fat bloated thing that would hardly fit on trails.
Maybe my old 91 lady can't meet safety requirements, but I imagine when I'm done with her she'd meet emissions requirements (maybe lol) and creature comforts. Back up camera, heated front and rear seats, rear bucket seats with removable center console and rear fan controls, 12v ports galore, manual auto mode, gauges galore, auto dim rear view mirror with compass and thermometer, heated and power side view mirrors, 6 speaker system with sub, power windows and locks, remote start... all in due time and much less than a current new SUV!

Emissions and efficiency compliance might come from a 5.3/6L80e swap.
Old 11-01-2016, 10:29 AM
  #83  
CF Veteran
 
Fred/N0AZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Monett, MO.
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

The worst thing to happen to cars in general was the EPA.


For Jeep it has to be Fiat taking control. and we have the Cherokee/Fiat 500 just about the same.
Old 11-01-2016, 11:09 AM
  #84  
Herp Derp Jerp
 
salad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Parham, ON
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

I'm not a Fiat fan but Chrysler's been screwing things up looong before they entered the picture!
Old 11-01-2016, 11:52 AM
  #85  
CF Veteran
 
1991Jeep_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fauquier County, Virginia
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Default

Originally Posted by salad
I'm not a Fiat fan but Chrysler's been screwing things up looong before they entered the picture!
Whaaaaat? No way. Chrysler's incredible wiring and bulletins calling for ATF in our AW4s were pinnacles of the business model. You're just a salty AMC person.

[/sarcasm]

Lol!
Old 11-01-2016, 01:32 PM
  #86  
Herp Derp Jerp
 
salad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Parham, ON
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

To be fair, XJ wiring was **** since the beginning. Go read cruiser54's tips and tell me that Chrysler did that. lol
Old 11-01-2016, 05:43 PM
  #87  
Senior Member
 
Rambler65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Abysmo, NJ
Posts: 921
Received 65 Likes on 53 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by salad
To be fair, XJ wiring was **** since the beginning. Go read cruiser54's tips and tell me that Chrysler did that. lol
AMC was pretty much on its last legs when the XJ was designed and built, so it should come as no surprise that corners were cut. Funding and technical lead for the XJ project actually came from Renault.
Old 11-01-2016, 06:49 PM
  #88  
Herp Derp Jerp
 
salad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Parham, ON
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by Rambler65
AMC was pretty much on its last legs when the XJ was designed and built, so it should come as no surprise that corners were cut. Funding and technical lead for the XJ project actually came from Renault.
Yeah. Chrysler actually fixed a fair number of things in the '91 redesign, but it's still a hunk of crap. I can't believe anybody signed off on the headlight circuit.
Old 11-01-2016, 10:11 PM
  #89  
Senior Member
 
Rambler65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Abysmo, NJ
Posts: 921
Received 65 Likes on 53 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by salad
Yeah. Chrysler actually fixed a fair number of things in the '91 redesign, but it's still a hunk of crap. I can't believe anybody signed off on the headlight circuit.
It's pretty much the way headlights had been done on domestic iron for decades. At least that particular problem is easy and inexpensive to fix.
Old 11-02-2016, 11:05 AM
  #90  
CF Veteran
 
Fred/N0AZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Monett, MO.
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by salad
I'm not a Fiat fan but Chrysler's been screwing things up looong before they entered the picture!

Your right the last Dodge U bought was a 1966 2Dr. Post Hemi. Had a few 1 ton 4x4 Dodge tow trucks good engines/trans but the bodies rusted away.


Quick Reply: Jeep's worst decision in the world



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.