New.... Best Cherokee? Is there?
#1
New.... Best Cherokee? Is there?
Hey guys, just signed up. First post. I did search but didn't find an answer. As you can tell from my name I currently have a landcruiser. Not getting rid of it but I can see the writing on the wall. It's going to get more expensive and harder to fix. I am not loyal to any brand. I want to buy an xj to slowly build up and use that as my trail rig. So, my question..... Is there a consensus pick on which xj is the best to get? Factoring in motor, axles transmission etc. Are there a couple where most people say you want this year. Like landcruisers most want 93-97. Anyways, thanks in advance. I like forward to reading the forum as I decide how I want to mod whichever Jeep I buy
#2
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 463
From: Southern OH
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
91-99 are the years I recommend, along with the Chrysler 8.25 rear axle. Auto or manual is personal preference both are great transmissions, same goes for the np231 vs np242 transfer cases, both are good but I prefer the 231 for better parts availability and its simplicity, some like the full time option the np242 gives you.
#3
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 958
From: Lost in the wilds of Virginia
Year: 1998 Classic (I'll get it running soon....) and 02 Grand
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
I'd say stay with 97-99, so you get the advantage of OBDII, but without the time-bomb head problems of the 2000-2001.
Avoid 96! It was a bastard year as they started switching over to get ready for OBDII, and parts can be.... surprising.
Avoid 96! It was a bastard year as they started switching over to get ready for OBDII, and parts can be.... surprising.
#4
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 166
From: Hunt County Texas
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L
95 Was the change over year for the seat bases as well to the late model style and the move to the larger axleshaft U-joints up front for all models. Prior to that only ABS XJs got the larger axleshaft u-joints.
#5
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 463
From: Southern OH
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
What are the advandages of OBDll? Also there is nothing wrong with the 96 model year, a friend of mine has had one for years and I have done all of the work on it, never had a problem finding parts for it, and it runs like a top.
#6
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 958
From: Lost in the wilds of Virginia
Year: 1998 Classic (I'll get it running soon....) and 02 Grand
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
#7
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 463
From: Southern OH
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Trending Topics
#9
CF Veteran
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,010
Likes: 261
From: Andover, VT
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
I'll argue that a 1999, federal emissions, non-ABS is best because:
1 - its the year I have.
2- 8.25 rear end rather than a Dana 35 (non-ABS)
3- 29 spline 8.25 rather than 27 spline (97+)
4- High pinion Dana 30 (1999-) rather than low pinion (2000+)
5- Larger 297x front axle u joints (94+)
6 - No vacuum engagement 4wd (unsure on year, early 90's)
7- No cali emissions junk (not actually sure what this year had?)
8- No mini-cats and extra O2 sensors in exhaust down pipe (2000+)
9- No 0331 cylinder head cracking issue (2000+)
10- Newer intake manifold (99+)
There's probably several other year specific changes that are worth noting but these come to mind. The biggest reason I think 99 is the best year is because of my first bullet point.
1 - its the year I have.
2- 8.25 rear end rather than a Dana 35 (non-ABS)
3- 29 spline 8.25 rather than 27 spline (97+)
4- High pinion Dana 30 (1999-) rather than low pinion (2000+)
5- Larger 297x front axle u joints (94+)
6 - No vacuum engagement 4wd (unsure on year, early 90's)
7- No cali emissions junk (not actually sure what this year had?)
8- No mini-cats and extra O2 sensors in exhaust down pipe (2000+)
9- No 0331 cylinder head cracking issue (2000+)
10- Newer intake manifold (99+)
There's probably several other year specific changes that are worth noting but these come to mind. The biggest reason I think 99 is the best year is because of my first bullet point.
#11
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 958
From: Lost in the wilds of Virginia
Year: 1998 Classic (I'll get it running soon....) and 02 Grand
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
#12
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 91
From: Syracuse, NY
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L
96 has been good to me. The parts aren't as unique as some would say. Some of the sensors are 95-like and some are 97-like (this happens if you have a late year 96, and can be frustrating if you don't shop for parts carefully). About the only real unique part is the fuel pump assembly. Which is still available, and has the benefit of being front-loaded such that the tank does not need to be dropped to repair it. The pump itself is not unique. All of the engine accessories (alt, steering pump, etc) and sensors (crank, cam, tps, etc.) have been highly available and cheap. Most of the suspension and underbody parts are the same as 95 and older and highly available. I have 8.25 rear axle and the NP231 transfer case.
Many of the internals (like ignition switch, fan resistor, etc.) were shared with vehicles like the early Dodge Dakotas, so those parts are highly available and cheap as well.
The wiring on the 96 (and older) is more simple (mostly a good thing). But it is unique to the 96 year (can be challenging). Which means that having an actual 96 FSM is pretty necessary for those that do their own troubleshooting. If identifying circuits and wiring colors is important to you, none of the Haynes, Chilton, or online information will be quite correct for the 96.
One benefit over the last 2 years has been some of the exterior trim parts have been dirt cheap. Probably because they are being cleared out for good. Take for example, getting an entire kit of fender flare brackets (the metal parts that keep the soft fender flares attached to the body). For a 96 I got an entire kit, with every bracket for about $80. For 97+ XJs the brackets seem to be sold separately, and for as much as $25-30 each. (there are about 12 of them).
Many of the internals (like ignition switch, fan resistor, etc.) were shared with vehicles like the early Dodge Dakotas, so those parts are highly available and cheap as well.
The wiring on the 96 (and older) is more simple (mostly a good thing). But it is unique to the 96 year (can be challenging). Which means that having an actual 96 FSM is pretty necessary for those that do their own troubleshooting. If identifying circuits and wiring colors is important to you, none of the Haynes, Chilton, or online information will be quite correct for the 96.
One benefit over the last 2 years has been some of the exterior trim parts have been dirt cheap. Probably because they are being cleared out for good. Take for example, getting an entire kit of fender flare brackets (the metal parts that keep the soft fender flares attached to the body). For a 96 I got an entire kit, with every bracket for about $80. For 97+ XJs the brackets seem to be sold separately, and for as much as $25-30 each. (there are about 12 of them).
The following users liked this post:
downs (12-24-2019)
#13
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 958
From: Lost in the wilds of Virginia
Year: 1998 Classic (I'll get it running soon....) and 02 Grand
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
The following users liked this post:
jordan96xj (12-26-2019)
#14
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 53
Likes: 19
From: Greenville, South Carolina
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
I really like my 96’ and my experience has been the same as Jordan’s.
It was the luck of the draw for me. I was looking for an early model in great original condition, one owner, 4 Wheel Drive automatic with the window sticker. I was flexible on all other aspects.
I ended up locating a 96’ sport, red with black body trim/grill and grey interior. 204k.
I’ve been a little fanatical when replacing or re-doing and I’ve had no trouble finding really any part I needed even sourcing OEM.
The exception to that being a piece of the belt molding that was damaged, but a forum member located a source for me.
-Eric
It was the luck of the draw for me. I was looking for an early model in great original condition, one owner, 4 Wheel Drive automatic with the window sticker. I was flexible on all other aspects.
I ended up locating a 96’ sport, red with black body trim/grill and grey interior. 204k.
I’ve been a little fanatical when replacing or re-doing and I’ve had no trouble finding really any part I needed even sourcing OEM.
The exception to that being a piece of the belt molding that was damaged, but a forum member located a source for me.
-Eric
#15
Seasoned Member
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 293
Likes: 161
From: Birmingham, AL
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L 6
I mean, I'm an 01 owner. Aside from the botched fan shroud repair, the folks I bought her from owned it for 9 years, as their daughters first car. Drove thru high school and college. Yeah its worn out but not neglected either. 295k on the clock right now, average 300-500 miles a week. May have had work to the head, may not be the original motor.
many may argue this point, but regardless of year, buy the one that seems well taken care of. Mine was dirty under the hood, the guy told me what it needed up front, and other than regular maintenance, life has been good.
many may argue this point, but regardless of year, buy the one that seems well taken care of. Mine was dirty under the hood, the guy told me what it needed up front, and other than regular maintenance, life has been good.