Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

only jeeps???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2017, 08:03 AM
  #16  
CF Veteran
 
EZEARL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 5,676
Received 298 Likes on 253 Posts
Year: '96
Model: Cherokee
Default

Yep,'91 Bronco II I believe it was? Never bothered dealing with the trans after the dead cylinder issue showed up. Extra clutches does sound like the fix though. I still see quite a few of them around here. None even remotely modified but in daily use even in bad weather. That says a lot for them right there. Our local motel owner has one he bought new and uses it to plow snow with. One thing I've always wonder about was the possibility of a too high COG if you were to lift them. Seems you could only go so wide tire/wheel wise to off set it.
Old 11-17-2017, 08:27 AM
  #17  
CF Veteran
 
Bugout4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by EZEARL
Yep,'91 Bronco II I believe it was? Never bothered dealing with the trans after the dead cylinder issue showed up. Extra clutches does sound like the fix though. I still see quite a few of them around here. None even remotely modified but in daily use even in bad weather. That says a lot for them right there. Our local motel owner has one he bought new and uses it to plow snow with. One thing I've always wonder about was the possibility of a too high COG if you were to lift them. Seems you could only go so wide tire/wheel wise to off set it.
Actually the full real frame and heavier suspension adds bottom weight and ballast to compensate against the COG differences. They had a bad report for this for several years though. But this was all started by the high speed roll overs caused by the Bridgestone/Firestone agreement with ford to remove a ply in the oem tires trying to make them ride better from the factory. It was a mistake to try and satisfy a very unrealistic market trend that wanted a tough 4X4 to ride like a car. Sometimes you just have to be smarter than your customer and explain that it is not a Cadillac.
Old 11-23-2017, 06:17 PM
  #18  
CF Veteran
 
F1Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,381
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

1998 - 2009 Subaru Outback is about the size of an XJ and super capable snow cars with excellent trail performance and moderate off-road capabilities especially with larger tires and a modest lift.

Pre-1998 wagons can be found with a 5-speed for even more fun.
Old 11-27-2017, 12:06 PM
  #19  
Member
 
Sota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

90s 4runners are really fun to own and can be put through a lot. Just watch for head gasket issues.

There’s a ton of 5 speeds out there too.

Other than that a bronco II or a samurai. Samurais are very impressive on the trails and can get you places others can’t go

Last edited by Sota; 11-27-2017 at 12:10 PM.
Old 11-27-2017, 09:46 PM
  #20  
CF Veteran
 
RocketMouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Southern Texas (former AZ & Aus)
Posts: 2,416
Received 249 Likes on 199 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: I6 4.0L
Default

be careful with the early 00's Outbacks... were notorious for for overheating and blowing head gaskets. And tight engine bay makes them a PITA to work on. Other years were okay I've heard.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 PM.