Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Pre 97 or 97+ Cherokees, Whats Your Opinion?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2011, 07:45 PM
  #16  
CF Veteran
 
jomps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville, tn
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 98 4.0 I6
Default

that chili red 99 manual 2 door in the fs section is legit
Old 11-29-2011, 08:08 PM
  #17  
CF Veteran
 
Desert Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West Valley
Posts: 3,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

98-99 were what I decided on when deciding another XJ was in order, heres what brought me to the decision.
97-99 has the updated styling with the newer interior (I gotta have cup holders and comfort) a steel rather than fiberglass hatch, the beefier Chrysler 8.25 29 spline rear, HP D-30 and a little more rounded look which I just prefer.
97 was out simply because history has taught me not to buy the first year of a model change, I was probably being paranoid, but thats just my rule.
2000-01, all the styling and comfort upgrades as the 97-99's, but.... head problems, distributorless ignition = problems and cost IMO. Too much damn emission garbage introduced as Chrysler faught to keep the Feds happy in the last two years of production and I did'nt want a low pinion front diff. So, those years were out for me.
I went with the 98, my son with the 99 and we could'nt be happier, and I have a place for my coffee cup to boot, Lol!
Old 11-29-2011, 08:45 PM
  #18  
Seasoned Member
 
xjchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Desert Rat has hit the nail on the head IMO. I had a 89 laredo and now i have a 98 classic. The 98 is so much more nice, and feels like it was built with more quality. I would stay away from 00-01 because of the head issue, and i prefer having distributor over the C.O.P. Dizzy's are way easier to deal with.
Old 11-29-2011, 08:55 PM
  #19  
Member
 
jwilson2598's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Front Royal, VA
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

When I was looking, 97-99 was definitely what I wanted. I personally prefer the 97+ styling, especially on the inside. I also like the HP30 and finding a non ABS model to have the 8.25 29 spline axle was a boon.
Old 11-29-2011, 09:40 PM
  #20  
CF Veteran
 
Jmb94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Owensville, MO
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1998
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.9
Default

I like my cupholders and steel hatch and modern interior and exterior.
And 8.25.

Last edited by Jmb94; 02-28-2012 at 12:07 AM.
Old 11-29-2011, 09:54 PM
  #21  
CF Veteran
 
1991Jeep_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fauquier County, Virginia
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Default

Love my '91 XJ. Besides, the later years can't call themselves a Laredo, can they? Lol j/k. I agree with the comfy updates of the later year XJ's, and Lord knows I will be swapping some seats and installing cupholders in my '91 XJ. But I like the older style, including the window setup and what not. Plus, the simplicity of OBD I still captures my love.
Old 11-29-2011, 10:23 PM
  #22  
CF Veteran
 
djlarroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I had a 95, and now a 97 and i like the 97 much much much much better!
Old 11-29-2011, 10:29 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
MT96XJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Libby, MT
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Default

I prefer the pre-97. I don't like the looks of the 97+, especially the interior.
Old 11-29-2011, 10:37 PM
  #24  
CF Veteran
 
89Laredo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,280
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Year: 1996
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by scruffythewild
You have a 97+ 2 door?
I have one... Green, lots of rust. Gonna get stripped and scrapped in spring.

I absolutely HATE 97+
I dont like the rounded off look... The ugly plastic trim that fades is a big turnoff, though the door moulding is easy to tear off and makes them look alot better. Annoying beeper for the doors/key in ignition, cant just pull out a buzzer like-97. Cheap plastic inside with too many rounded off lines, harder to reach heat controls. The risk of airbags going off when you go wheeling, etc.
Old 11-30-2011, 09:23 PM
  #25  
Newbie
 
agrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Richmond KY
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I like the 97+ myself.
Old 11-30-2011, 09:26 PM
  #26  
CF Veteran
 
liftedjeepxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

I had a 90/91/99 currently.

Most people like the 91-96 high output 4.0's

I love my 99 but mainly because I got it with 60k miles and built it to what I want it to be. It's flawless in my eyes.
Attached Thumbnails Pre 97 or 97+ Cherokees, Whats Your Opinion?-image-225635039.jpg  
Old 11-30-2011, 09:33 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
xjtrailrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

My favorite year is the 96 with 90 coming in a close second (Gotta love a RENIX)

I have a 2k also and I like it too but I like the older look better

MJ's look awesome with a 97+ front clip
Old 11-30-2011, 09:49 PM
  #28  
CF Veteran
 
Jeepjunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: somewhere Gee oh Dee cant find me...
Posts: 4,529
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by 89Laredo
I have one... Green, lots of rust. Gonna get stripped and scrapped in spring.

I absolutely HATE 97+
I dont like the rounded off look... The ugly plastic trim that fades is a big turnoff, though the door moulding is easy to tear off and makes them look alot better. Annoying beeper for the doors/key in ignition, cant just pull out a buzzer like-97. Cheap plastic inside with too many rounded off lines, harder to reach heat controls. The risk of airbags going off when you go wheeling, etc.
^^x2!!!
Old 11-30-2011, 09:51 PM
  #29  
CF Veteran
 
jomps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville, tn
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 98 4.0 I6
Default

haha how do you hate other xjs. some have more desireable pros but come on....its all gravy baby
Old 11-30-2011, 10:00 PM
  #30  
CF Veteran
 
Donnie_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
Default

97, or pre 91 are my favorites. If I had to choose, it'd be the pre 91. no 98's or newer. It's gonna anger some people but to me, 98's and newer are just too chrysler molested. Not that the 97 wasn't but it was the year with cupholders and the least chrysler molestation. I'm a big fan of the old renix systems. Obviously I am a firm believer in K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid). like I said, know some people are going to be offended, that's why I didn't go into detail on my reasoning (aside from the fact I've typed it 100 times on this forum, search my posts). That's not to tell anyone else what or what not to buy, it's just my opinion since that's what this thread is asking for.


Quick Reply: Pre 97 or 97+ Cherokees, Whats Your Opinion?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 AM.