Pre 97 or 97+ Cherokees, Whats Your Opinion?
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan (Home state) Stationed in Montana
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Year: 1993
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2L MPI V8 (318)
Love my 94 Country. Great trim package, interior was partial leather and pretty decent, love the looks and front clip. More rugged tail-light looks wise than the 97+ models and more "rough" looking flares, compared to the more rounded and blended flares on the 97+. Hate the rounded off ****-plastic dash on the 97+, prefer my boxy black/woodgrain plastic dash and trim. 8.25 Rear, Dana 30 front, OBD-I (Saving me from OBDII). No Renix or Coil ignitions. (Love my distributor ignition system) Country package, so a little beefier/higher suspension from factory, good heads unlike the 1999 (Some 99's at the end of the year) 2000, and 2001 models with the India head with the casting defect. Prefer the pre-97 cooling systems; tend to have less problems. Simpler and preferred fuel system than the 97+. Absolutely love my 94 4.0 High Output motor compared to the others. Pre-97's are a lot more simple, rugged, and boxy. Which I love. 246,xxx miles and still kicking ***, driven daily, and wheeled weekly as recommended.
Last edited by CherokeeCountry; 12-01-2011 at 11:35 PM.
#47
CF Veteran
I've never been that deep in a Jeep myself but Google would suggest that they do.
http://www.offroaders.com/tech/jeep/...y-amc258i6.htm
http://www.offroaders.com/tech/jeep/...y-amc258i6.htm
#48
Registered Users
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ny
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0ho
Hey, I was just wondering on everyone's thoughts about pre 97 XJ's vs 97+ XJ's
I was wondering myself but couldn't find a thread on it. Personally i own a 98 Classic and i'm not sure which one i like better. I Actually like the design on the pre 97's except the tail lights. But what kills it for me is the outdated interior for the 90-96. But hey that's my opinion, Whats your's?
I was wondering myself but couldn't find a thread on it. Personally i own a 98 Classic and i'm not sure which one i like better. I Actually like the design on the pre 97's except the tail lights. But what kills it for me is the outdated interior for the 90-96. But hey that's my opinion, Whats your's?
obd2 is for suckers, it was a system designed to make money for those who repair it. Why spend tons of time and effort to chase a 'slight vac leak' code that can come frm something as stupid as a loose gas cap.
obd2 has aids. 95 and older for the win.
Solution to your preferences?
put the 97 + interior and front doors / front clip on your 95 and older jeep.
#49
CF Veteran
I've never been that deep in a Jeep myself but Google would suggest that they do.
http://www.offroaders.com/tech/jeep/...y-amc258i6.htm
http://www.offroaders.com/tech/jeep/...y-amc258i6.htm
#50
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
I actually like OBD2... one code scanner for all vehicles 96 and newer is pretty convenient. No it isn't completely accurate... if it was, how would a wrench like myself ever get paid for diagnosis?
#51
CF Veteran
#52
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dillon, MT
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO I6
i got a 95 and when i had a chance to pick up a rolled 97 for parts i jumped on it and put the front end onto mine (my center console has cup holders now too!)
heres some pics
heres some pics
#53
96 and earlier are pathetic, they don't have the push bar on the front bumpers from the factory like 97-01 have. I push my friends dinky little 95 around all the time with my push bars... :just kidding :P oh 97-99 is safer, more reliable, has obd2(unlike Renix and earlier), has stronger u joints, stronger engine block, stronger 29 spline axle, and the list goes on.... But I still like 96 and earlier more, but that's just me.
#55
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
96 and earlier are pathetic, they don't have the push bar on the front bumpers from the factory like 97-01 have. I push my friends dinky little 95 around all the time with my push bars... :just kidding :P oh 97-99 is safer, more reliable, has obd2(unlike Renix and earlier), has stronger u joints, stronger engine block, stronger 29 spline axle, and the list goes on.... But I still like 96 and earlier more, but that's just me.
#56
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Yes,.. they do have the main bearing girdle. Well at least my 96 classic has it. I know because I recently changed my rear main seal and after pulling the bezzillion bolts out of the oil pan to drop it I was hoping just to have straight access to the rear main bearing cap, but unfortunately I had to take another bazzillion bolts out of the main bearing girdle to get to the bolts for the rear main cap. Not fun while having oil steadily drip all over you.
#57
Originally Posted by Donnie_K
stronger engine block? safer? more reliable? Care to source some fo these claims?
Side impact beams were added in 1995 and the whole unit body was reinforced for 1997 redesign to meet stricter NHTSA crash testing standards and a passenger airbag was standard, abs was optional. For 1997 stronger and sturdier u joints were added as well. And the fiberglass rear hatch was switched to steel for added longevity. Mostly just a lot of small changes to make it safer, more reliable, and more durable then previous years. As this is the goal of any vehicle redesign.
Last edited by Milk1027; 02-28-2012 at 09:20 AM.