Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Pre 97 or 97+ Cherokees, Whats Your Opinion?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2011, 11:28 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
CherokeeCountry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan (Home state) Stationed in Montana
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1993
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2L MPI V8 (318)
Default

Love my 94 Country. Great trim package, interior was partial leather and pretty decent, love the looks and front clip. More rugged tail-light looks wise than the 97+ models and more "rough" looking flares, compared to the more rounded and blended flares on the 97+. Hate the rounded off ****-plastic dash on the 97+, prefer my boxy black/woodgrain plastic dash and trim. 8.25 Rear, Dana 30 front, OBD-I (Saving me from OBDII). No Renix or Coil ignitions. (Love my distributor ignition system) Country package, so a little beefier/higher suspension from factory, good heads unlike the 1999 (Some 99's at the end of the year) 2000, and 2001 models with the India head with the casting defect. Prefer the pre-97 cooling systems; tend to have less problems. Simpler and preferred fuel system than the 97+. Absolutely love my 94 4.0 High Output motor compared to the others. Pre-97's are a lot more simple, rugged, and boxy. Which I love. 246,xxx miles and still kicking ***, driven daily, and wheeled weekly as recommended.

Last edited by CherokeeCountry; 12-01-2011 at 11:35 PM.
Old 12-02-2011, 05:34 AM
  #47  
CF Veteran
 
Morat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Riding of Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,435
Received 67 Likes on 57 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Shaggimo
Did the 96's have the main bearing girdle too?
I've never been that deep in a Jeep myself but Google would suggest that they do.
http://www.offroaders.com/tech/jeep/...y-amc258i6.htm
Old 12-02-2011, 05:46 AM
  #48  
Registered Users
 
The Blacksmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ny
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0ho
Default

Originally Posted by scruffythewild
Hey, I was just wondering on everyone's thoughts about pre 97 XJ's vs 97+ XJ's
I was wondering myself but couldn't find a thread on it. Personally i own a 98 Classic and i'm not sure which one i like better. I Actually like the design on the pre 97's except the tail lights. But what kills it for me is the outdated interior for the 90-96. But hey that's my opinion, Whats your's?
you are from new york, run RUN LIKE HELL away from obd2 vehicles.

obd2 is for suckers, it was a system designed to make money for those who repair it. Why spend tons of time and effort to chase a 'slight vac leak' code that can come frm something as stupid as a loose gas cap.

obd2 has aids. 95 and older for the win.

Solution to your preferences?

put the 97 + interior and front doors / front clip on your 95 and older jeep.
Old 12-02-2011, 07:45 AM
  #49  
CF Veteran
 
CoffeeCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
Default

Originally Posted by Morat
I've never been that deep in a Jeep myself but Google would suggest that they do.
http://www.offroaders.com/tech/jeep/...y-amc258i6.htm
My 98' did. The 95' block I got for my stroker didn't.
Old 12-02-2011, 07:53 AM
  #50  
CF Veteran
 
Donnie_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
Default

I actually like OBD2... one code scanner for all vehicles 96 and newer is pretty convenient. No it isn't completely accurate... if it was, how would a wrench like myself ever get paid for diagnosis?
Old 12-02-2011, 09:50 AM
  #51  
CF Veteran
 
Morat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Riding of Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,435
Received 67 Likes on 57 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by CoffeeCommando
My 98' did. The 95' block I got for my stroker didn't.
Sounds about right then.
Old 02-27-2012, 11:16 PM
  #52  
Member
 
xjdave95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dillon, MT
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO I6
Default

i got a 95 and when i had a chance to pick up a rolled 97 for parts i jumped on it and put the front end onto mine (my center console has cup holders now too!)
heres some pics
Name:  DSC00085.jpg
Views: 125
Size:  53.2 KB
Name:  DSC00087.jpg
Views: 125
Size:  45.8 KB
Old 02-27-2012, 11:32 PM
  #53  
Junior Member
 
Milk1027's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

96 and earlier are pathetic, they don't have the push bar on the front bumpers from the factory like 97-01 have. I push my friends dinky little 95 around all the time with my push bars... :just kidding :P oh 97-99 is safer, more reliable, has obd2(unlike Renix and earlier), has stronger u joints, stronger engine block, stronger 29 spline axle, and the list goes on.... But I still like 96 and earlier more, but that's just me.
Old 02-27-2012, 11:39 PM
  #54  
CF Veteran
 
Power73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I like the interior and exterior of the 97+ a lot better
Old 02-28-2012, 06:48 AM
  #55  
CF Veteran
 
Donnie_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
Default

Originally Posted by Milk1027
96 and earlier are pathetic, they don't have the push bar on the front bumpers from the factory like 97-01 have. I push my friends dinky little 95 around all the time with my push bars... :just kidding :P oh 97-99 is safer, more reliable, has obd2(unlike Renix and earlier), has stronger u joints, stronger engine block, stronger 29 spline axle, and the list goes on.... But I still like 96 and earlier more, but that's just me.
stronger engine block? safer? more reliable? Care to source some fo these claims?
Old 02-28-2012, 07:38 AM
  #56  
CF Veteran
 
aquickmopar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Shaggimo
Did the 96's have the main bearing girdle too?
Yes,.. they do have the main bearing girdle. Well at least my 96 classic has it. I know because I recently changed my rear main seal and after pulling the bezzillion bolts out of the oil pan to drop it I was hoping just to have straight access to the rear main bearing cap, but unfortunately I had to take another bazzillion bolts out of the main bearing girdle to get to the bolts for the rear main cap. Not fun while having oil steadily drip all over you.
Old 02-28-2012, 09:16 AM
  #57  
Junior Member
 
Milk1027's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Donnie_K

stronger engine block? safer? more reliable? Care to source some fo these claims?
Small changes were made to the cylinder head for the 1995 model year. In 1996, the engine block was updated, it made use of more webbing cast into the block, and a stud girdle for added rigidity of the crankshaft main bearings.

Side impact beams were added in 1995 and the whole unit body was reinforced for 1997 redesign to meet stricter NHTSA crash testing standards and a passenger airbag was standard, abs was optional. For 1997 stronger and sturdier u joints were added as well. And the fiberglass rear hatch was switched to steel for added longevity. Mostly just a lot of small changes to make it safer, more reliable, and more durable then previous years. As this is the goal of any vehicle redesign.

Last edited by Milk1027; 02-28-2012 at 09:20 AM.
Old 02-28-2012, 12:15 PM
  #58  
Member
 
BuckH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Brock TX.
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1994 4dr Sport
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default 94 ftw

I like the older interior better, actully i really like my 94. no airbags, real simple
Old 02-28-2012, 12:26 PM
  #59  
Junior Member
 
Milk1027's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by BuckH
I like the older interior better, actully i really like my 94. no airbags, real simple
I agree
Old 02-28-2012, 04:00 PM
  #60  
CF Veteran
 
NorCalJeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1987 Comanche,1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Renix
Default

i like the look of the older model Cherokees outside,but i like the newer Cherokees interior and grill.


Quick Reply: Pre 97 or 97+ Cherokees, Whats Your Opinion?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.