Things not to say to an xj owner
#571
CF Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: fallon, nv
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
cherokees suck.
and yes...i'm saying this. i didn't hear it, I'm just saying it. they are a pile of useable parts to repair comanches. they are nothing more than one of the most commonly available used vehicles on earth. there is a reason that they are the 2nd most common C4C vehicles. second only to the ford exploder, which is worthless in every regard.
and yes...i'm saying this. i didn't hear it, I'm just saying it. they are a pile of useable parts to repair comanches. they are nothing more than one of the most commonly available used vehicles on earth. there is a reason that they are the 2nd most common C4C vehicles. second only to the ford exploder, which is worthless in every regard.
#573
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rocket Country MI
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
my boss- is that thing even 4x4?
me- uh yeah, why?
boss- i didn't think mini vans came in 4x4....
wtf is that supposed to mean ugh i hate working for a caveman
me- uh yeah, why?
boss- i didn't think mini vans came in 4x4....
wtf is that supposed to mean ugh i hate working for a caveman
Last edited by Sideways99; 01-30-2011 at 12:20 PM. Reason: typo
#575
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: huntsville alabama
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 inline 6
Originally Posted by JeepCoMJ
cherokees suck.
and yes...i'm saying this. i didn't hear it, I'm just saying it. they are a pile of useable parts to repair comanches. they are nothing more than one of the most commonly available used vehicles on earth. there is a reason that they are the 2nd most common C4C vehicles. second only to the ford exploder, which is worthless in every regard.
and yes...i'm saying this. i didn't hear it, I'm just saying it. they are a pile of useable parts to repair comanches. they are nothing more than one of the most commonly available used vehicles on earth. there is a reason that they are the 2nd most common C4C vehicles. second only to the ford exploder, which is worthless in every regard.
#576
CF Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 1987
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I've owned over 40 jeeps. all of them were unibodies. i know what they are.
they are just as common as exploders and s10 blazers. they're better because they're a not fords or chevys...but they're still nothing but a pile of comanche parts to me.
*shrug* I'll own one here and there, drive it for 3 months, and get bored with it. every MJ I've registered and driven...I still have.
#577
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rocket Country MI
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
#578
Caracticus Potts The Mod
I've owned over 40 jeeps. all of them were unibodies. i know what they are.
they are just as common as exploders and s10 blazers. they're better because they're a not fords or chevys...but they're still nothing but a pile of comanche parts to me.
*shrug* I'll own one here and there, drive it for 3 months, and get bored with it. every MJ I've registered and driven...I still have.
they are just as common as exploders and s10 blazers. they're better because they're a not fords or chevys...but they're still nothing but a pile of comanche parts to me.
*shrug* I'll own one here and there, drive it for 3 months, and get bored with it. every MJ I've registered and driven...I still have.
#579
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rapid City SD
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Brought mine home and my wife said "i thought you got the jeep that you could take the top off jeep are only fun with the top off." Finally she gets it things ARE more fun with their tops off!
#582
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Llewellyn, PA
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Thing not to say to an XJ owner:
Those POS cars are unreliable, they're metal death traps
My reaction: REALLY, SO PLASTIC IS MORE SAFE THAN METAL!
#583
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: huntsville alabama
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 inline 6
Originally Posted by Griff94
Agreed, my XJ has been really reliable, and most likely saved me from injury in my accident, If I was driving my mothers '06 Nissan Pathfinder or my grandmothers '02 Toyota Camry (both are mostly made of plastic and fiberglass) I might have sustained more severe injuries than just a bump on the side of the head.
Thing not to say to an XJ owner:
Those POS cars are unreliable, they're metal death traps
My reaction: REALLY, SO PLASTIC IS MORE SAFE THAN METAL!
Thing not to say to an XJ owner:
Those POS cars are unreliable, they're metal death traps
My reaction: REALLY, SO PLASTIC IS MORE SAFE THAN METAL!
#584
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Originally Posted by Griff94
Agreed, my XJ has been really reliable, and most likely saved me from injury in my accident, If I was driving my mothers '06 Nissan Pathfinder or my grandmothers '02 Toyota Camry (both are mostly made of plastic and fiberglass) I might have sustained more severe injuries than just a bump on the side of the head.
Thing not to say to an XJ owner:
Those POS cars are unreliable, they're metal death traps
My reaction: REALLY, SO PLASTIC IS MORE SAFE THAN METAL!
Thing not to say to an XJ owner:
Those POS cars are unreliable, they're metal death traps
My reaction: REALLY, SO PLASTIC IS MORE SAFE THAN METAL!
#585
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cloquet, MN
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Year: 2000 Ltd.
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
We should really get back on track here, but the "plastic" new cars ARE generally actually safer. They don't hold up as well in an accident because they are designed to absorb the energy of the crash and keep it from getting to the occupants. The outer body panels may be plastic, but the unibody is still steel. Your XJ might hold up better in an accident, but that means your body takes more energy. I don't know about you guys, maybe you have clones, but I'd rather my wife and I have to replace the car than have my wife have to replace me. The 2000 XJ only rates like 3 stars for gov't crash testing.