which xj is bestt??? i need help!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

01-12-2011, 11:24 PM

#31

jeepguy93

CF Veteran

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jan 2011

Location: aurora colorado

Posts: 2,550

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Year: 1991

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

Still need opinions. The 94 is 3300 no long arms I found out and the 2000 is 3800 hard decision!

Reply Like

01-13-2011, 03:52 AM

#32

jcwclm

CF Veteran

Join Date: Sep 2010

Location: Warsaw, IN

Posts: 2,844

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Year: 2000,1990,1999

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeepguy93

Still need opinions. The 94 is 3300 no long arms I found out and the 2000 is 3800 hard decision!

In the end its all up to you man. I really like the 2000 though, haha.

Reply Like

01-13-2011, 09:57 AM

#33

nismo5

Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2009

Location: chico,ca

Posts: 553

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Year: 1989

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

i would def go for the 2000 IMO the 6" long arm lift will perform better and ride better and is plenty high enough for the 33's and i like the newer look

Reply Like

01-13-2011, 10:19 AM

#34

MVDCXJ

Seasoned Member

Join Date: Nov 2009

Location: Beltsville, MD

Posts: 308

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Year: 2000

Model: Cherokee

Engine: I6

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeepguy93

Still need opinions. The 94 is 3300 no long arms I found out and the 2000 is 3800 hard decision!

Ok I dont know why this is even a question anymore. Lets see; lower mileage, newer body and everything else, better lift kit, $400 more. . . . . . seems like a no brainer.

Since you didnt know the '94 had a short arm lift I assume you havent test driven either vehicle. Why not go test drive them both and see which you like better. Who knows maybe the 2000 knocks and shakes like crazy or the other way around