Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TOTM roll cages

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2012, 10:10 AM
  #1  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
builtnotbought89''s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 6,328
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1989 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default TOTM roll cages

TOTM FOR MARCH 2012 ROLL CAGES!

Let's see what you've done to protect you, & your passengers? Internal, exo, hybrid, material, mounting, after market, or home brewed?

TOTM (Topic Of The Month) is a group effort posting helpful info. Post what pics you have on the topic, as well as helpful info for people looking into these topics for their first time. The Idea is to have a less hardcore verison of pirates TOTM here on CherokeeForum.

Remember to update any of our older TOTM threads as you build, & help me, help you, by throwing out some suggestions for future topics here. http:// https://www.cherokeeforum.com/f67/totm-rear-bumpers-118393/www.cherokeeforum.com/f19/tot...gestion-93121/

A thanks to DualPurposeXJ for his TOTM suggestion of cages! I know this is a little on the hardcore side for this site, but lately I've seen alot of cages popping up here.

Here's what I've been workin on. Started off with 60' of 1.5"x.120 wall DOM, which made up about 90% of the cage. (ran me $3.45/foot 3.45x60=$207 + tax!) The spreaders from the B pillar back, as well as the shock hoop, & vertical bar off the hoop for the tire carrier are 1.5"x.120 wall HREW. Used a buddys JD2 model 3 bender which worked like a dream! For mounting I will be sandwiching the floor with (2) 4"x4"x3/6 plate, & (4) 3/8 bolts per leg. I've yet to plate the mid section of the frame, but in the end I will have supports running from the bottom plate to the frame. If ya have any questions feel free to ask!













Old 03-01-2012, 11:10 AM
  #2  
Seasoned Member
 
john78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: fairview utah
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

one question I have when started checking out cages it seemed everybody was running a X in the area above passenger and driver now they seem to going the way yours is, is it just a preference or in opinion is one better then the other
Old 03-01-2012, 12:04 PM
  #3  
CF Veteran
 
jmaxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utardiland
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: whats left of a 91
Model: Cherokee
Engine: one that makes noise
Default

it all depends, most competitions these days require an X to pass tech. a Y will support just fine plus leave headroom, which in an XJ is limited before tube is added. mine just has the old school 2 straight bars in the middle and has survived numerous rolls with no issue. it's more a preference.

remember on cages more tube isn't always stronger, proper triangulation can be obtained with minimal tube. and design's can vary as to taste and style one is going for.
Old 03-01-2012, 12:11 PM
  #4  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
builtnotbought89''s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 6,328
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1989 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

If you wanna get technical about it.. Yes an X would be better, because triangulation is key. On the other hand look at my cage, its not perfectly triangulated, yet I'm damn sure it would hold up next to one that was! As long as you have triangulation in mind, to help disperse the inpacked threwout the cage. Then it comes down to personal preferece IMO!

Last edited by builtnotbought89'; 03-01-2012 at 06:26 PM.
Old 03-01-2012, 06:37 PM
  #5  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
builtnotbought89''s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 6,328
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1989 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Let's see some cages...
Old 03-01-2012, 06:40 PM
  #6  
CF Veteran
 
JeepingDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CT.
Posts: 18,786
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Year: 88
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

I don't have one yet..
Old 03-02-2012, 04:19 PM
  #7  
Seasoned Member
 
GRANDLICH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: east mesa, AZ
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: rebuilt 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by JeepingDan
I don't have one yet..
x2 on that note!
Old 03-02-2012, 09:54 PM
  #8  
Member
 
DualPurposeXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Menifee, CA
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

this is basically what i base my cage designs off of.

Roll Cage Design 101

I got inspired to write this article after seeing countless ill-conceived designs and poorly executed fabrications on the internet. Here in California we have a wealth of information and experience in cage design. Even kids who are hacking on their trucks in their mom’s garage with a 110V MIG can do a good job with the many fine examples in this part of the country. This information is directed more towards those who are new to off roading and have no clue, and the four wheelers who haven’t seen desert racing technology, and don’t know any better.

I consider desert race cars like Class 1 and Trophy Trucks to be the pinnacle of chassis and cage design in the off road world, and they are the yardstick by which I measure all designs. The one area they could improve in are non-structural crumple zones. This could be because they would add weight or complexity, but I think some sacrificial tubing or energy absorbing bumpers in the front and rear, and also the sides, would help reduce injuries in endos and other severe crashes.

This article is intended to be a guide to the basics of cage design. I don’t claim to know everything in the world about building cages and chassis, and I am not a metallurgist, but I am a CAD designer, fabricator and welder. I am always interested in learning more, so please post up with any corrections and additions to the following guidelines.

Material:

There are three basic choices for material.

Mild steel tubing is typically made from sheet that is rolled and welded. The alloy is 1010 or higher. This material is not as strong as the others, but is totally acceptable with a proper design. It is even preferred by some for its tendency to bend before breaking.

DOM steel tubing is usually manufactured the same way as mild, including the welding. The alloy is typically 1018 up to 1026, the higher the number, the higher the carbon content and the stronger the steel. DOM means Drawn Over Mandrel. It is a process, not an alloy or type of steel. The DOM process “trues” the tube and hides the weld, giving it more accurate dimensions, which also strengthens the tube through cold working. DOM is about twice the cost of mild, and almost as much as 4130. DOM is considered the best choice for most builders, since it is the strongest mild steel option, and it does not require the expertise of 4130 methods.

4130 chromoly steel tubing is usually a true seamless tube, with chromium and molybdenum added for strength. This allows for a lighter design, with a thinner wall as strong as a thicker wall mild steel tube. 4130 is very expensive and is used most often in big budget builds. It requires heat treating after welding to achieve maximum strength. 4130 suspension components should definitely be heat treated for greatest strength and benefit.

The size of tubing to be used is determined by the weight of the vehicle, or the class it will be raced in, along with other factors. In general, it would be wise to use a minimum of 1.5 x .120 for lightweight vehicles like sand rails, 1.75 x .120 for mid sized vehicles like pre-runner trucks or Jeeps, and 2 x .120 for the heaviest vehicles like trophy trucks or huge 4WD buggies.

To learn more about tubing specifications, visit http://www.astm.org/.

A few more facts:

CREW = Cold Rolled Electric Welded
HREW = Hot Rolled Electric Welded
ERW = Electric Resistance Welded
CDS = Cold Drawn Seamless
DOM = Drawn Over Mandrel
HFS = Hot Finished Seamless
CDBW = Cold Drawn Butt Welded (Continuous)
W&D = Welded and Drawn

11 GA = .120 12 GA = .105 13 GA = .090 14 GA = .075
16 GA = .060 18 GA = .048 20 GA = .035

1-3/4" x .095 wall is 1.59 lbs/ft
1-3/4" x .120 wall is 2.09 lbs/ft
Steel = .2843 lb/cu in Aluminum = .0975 lb/cu in

Bending the tubes:

The first rule of bending tubing is that no deformation is allowed. The bend must be smooth with no scoring or ovalizing of the tube. Do not use a pipe bender to bend tube, because the dies do not fit correctly. The HF “kinker” is infamous for a terrible bend on tubing.

Notching the tubes:

There are countless methods of notching a tube so it will fit tightly to another tube prior to welding. This is also called a fish mouth. The most common way to notch is with a hole saw, which is often done in a Tube Notcher tool. Cheap ones are available from HF, and high end models are available from several manufacturers. There are methods of notching on a mill or lathe, and there are also expensive dedicated machines for notching that use end mills or abrasive belts. A proper fitting and tight notch are extremely important for a strong weld joint.

Designing the cage:

There are many design rules that should be followed whenever possible.

The most important rule is to make triangles, not squares, and especially not artsy-curvy designs. Look at any structure in the world, whether it is a bridge, a crane, or a cantilevered sign, and you will see triangles everywhere. This principle should be applied as much as possible to a chassis or cage design. Every tube should be one leg of a triangle if possible. This is especially true of the primary structural tubes. The peripheral tubes like bumpers can be more “artistic”. It’s a good idea to build crumple zones into bumpers to absorb crash damage. It is better to crush a bumper than to damage the main chassis structure. A bolt on bumper makes repairs much easier than a welded on structure.

Bends are not your friends. Some bends are unavoidable in a design, but they should be minimized, not maximized. Even a perfect bend is weaker than a straight tube. Bends should never be mid-span, or unsupported. The apex of a bend should be a node point or junction for at least one other tube, and gusseted unless several tubes meet at the node. An example of a node is the center of an “X”.

It is advisable to gusset corners, especially when building a bare minimum cage. This can be done with triangular plates welded into the corners. A stronger method is to weld a 6-12” tube diagonally in the corner, similar to the letter A.

“T” junctions are called a dead tube junction, as one tube dead ends into another. This should be avoided whenever possible, because the dead end tube will bend the other one when the loads are along the dead tube.

“A” pillars should not be leaned back too far, unless a second A pillar is added to triangulate it. Otherwise it can collapse into the passenger compartment. The B pillar will be strongest when near vertical. It is always safer to double up on the A and B pillar on heavier vehicles. All cages benefit from a vertical tube in the windshield area. An inverted “V” like this /\ is even stronger.

The B hoop should have an “X” built into it, or at the very least a diagonal or a V. If the A and B hoops are inverted U shapes, the “spreader” tubes that go between them should intersect the apex of the bends for greatest strength, and they should be straight. The roof area should have a V or X built into it, depending on overall design. The B hoop needs to have rearward supports, typically at a downward 45 degree angle. If the B hoop does not have an X, then these tubes definitely should.

On vehicles with sheet metal bodies or cabs, the A and B pillars should pass through the floor and weld solidly to the frame rails or tubes. No tube should ever terminate like a “T” into sheet metal, such as a floor or firewall. If necessary, it is acceptable to weld a plate to each tube, on each side of the sheet metal, and use four bolts to connect them together, but only if the cab is solid mounted to the frame. Otherwise the sheet metal can tear when the cab flexes on rubber mounts. The least desirable arrangement is to keep the rubber mounts, and tie the cage into the mounts.

Most exo cages seem to be designed to protect sheet metal more than the vehicle occupants. Which do you value more? If an exo cage is a must for you, try to incorporate as many of these design features as you can, especially in the cab area.

Some say that any cage is better than no cage. This may be true in some cases, like flopping over at zero mph. But what if a failed hill climb attempt results in looping out and a triple endo down the hill? What if an off camber slip results in six barrel rolls down a rocky slope? What if one of these tumbles comes to a sudden halt against a large tree or rock? It is in these worst case scenarios when you need a properly designed cage and chassis, fully triangulated, and expertly welded. A marginal cage could collapse, doing more harm than good.

If you are not 100% sure that you can make a strong high quality weld, leave it to a professional. In general, TIG welding is considered superior to MIG welding, but a proper MIG weld is completely acceptable and just as strong. Tube splices and repairs should always be sleeved for strength and rosette welded, never just butt welded.

The more you integrate these “rules” and suggestions into your cage, the stronger and safer it will be.
i bought T&J's performance cage kit for 2 reasons one was when i first got my xj the plans were a simple cage some bolt ons and 33's (boy did those plans change quick ) the second reason was i got a hell of a deal on it.

there cage is built out of 1 3/4" .120 wall CREW. the cage kit is your basic A,B,C,D pillars and i added the diagnol tubes.

Name:  1228101204.jpg
Views: 2602
Size:  78.3 KB

the start of the X in my B pillar

Name:  SDC11305.jpg
Views: 4355
Size:  142.4 KB

T&J's kit is a great kit for a mildly built jeep but as i got more and more into custom parts/fabrication i wanted to change some things about the cage.

the first thing on my list of things to change is the A pillar bends around the stock dash since i planned on making a custom dash i decided to cut and sleeve the A pillar

cut the A pillar

Name:  SDC11302.jpg
Views: 2464
Size:  93.3 KB

the second thing i want to change is the C pillar ties into the inner wheel wells. im going to cut those out and bend them around the wheel well and tie them into the floor/frame somehow.

thats where im at with my cage rite now but i should be finishing it soon. i will edit my post with pics when its done. oh and sorry about the long post
Old 03-02-2012, 09:59 PM
  #9  
CF Veteran
 
jmaxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utardiland
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: whats left of a 91
Model: Cherokee
Engine: one that makes noise
Default

That's some great info except one part, the basis of the cages used for desert racing and rock crawling are two different things. Desert racers like weight and strength since they are going at extremely high speeds. A desert racing cage is way to heavy for rock crawling, in rock crawling you want lightweight and strength which can easily be obtained.

And mounting your c pillars to the fender wells as long as its plated on both sides works fine, my first cage was ran like that and took many rolls, a couple hard ones with no major issues.

Last edited by jmaxj; 03-02-2012 at 10:43 PM.
Old 03-02-2012, 10:07 PM
  #10  
Seasoned Member
 
john78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: fairview utah
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

thats good info there big guy thanks for putting that on there
Old 03-03-2012, 10:55 AM
  #11  
Member
 
DualPurposeXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Menifee, CA
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by jmaxj
That's some great info except one part, the basis of the cages used for desert racing and rock crawling are two different things. Desert racers like weight and strength since they are going at extremely high speeds. A desert racing cage is way to heavy for rock crawling, in rock crawling you want lightweight and strength which can easily be obtained.

And mounting your c pillars to the fender wells as long as its plated on both sides works fine, my first cage was ran like that and took many rolls, a couple hard ones with no major issues.
Valid point but I wouldn't say they like weight its just unavoidable when building a cage to race specs. And I understand that rock crawlers don't need a full blown race legal cage. But you do want a properly designed cage with some triangulation.
what if a failed hill climb attempt results in looping out and a triple endo down the hill? What if an off camber slip results in six barrel rolls down a rocky slope? What if one of these tumbles comes to a sudden halt against a large tree or rock? It is in these worst case scenarios when you need a properly designed cage and chassis, fully triangulated, and expertly welded.
Also another thing that should be mentioned is proper harness mounting. If your harness are not mounted correctly they will do more harm than good

Correct way to mount harnesses
Name:  Install4CWeb.jpg
Views: 2379
Size:  97.8 KB
Name:  3-bar.jpg
Views: 2309
Size:  18.8 KB

Also once you cage your jeep it is important to ditch the stock seat belts and use harnesses.

Here's why, this picture is of a mild roll while heading back to camp.
WARNING: BLOOD
http://yfrog.com/1nla48f8a9d25084000951204j

I guess I should have mentioned why I didn't like C pillar landing on the wheel well. Im building my jeep to go fast and crawl so im mounting my shocks through the floor. And instead of hopping they clear my C pillar im just gonna move it. Also it will be a little peace of mind having the C pillar tied into the frame as I plan on having a 3rd seat in the back.

Last edited by DualPurposeXJ; 03-03-2012 at 02:12 PM.
Old 03-03-2012, 02:22 PM
  #12  
CF Veteran
 
jmaxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utardiland
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: whats left of a 91
Model: Cherokee
Engine: one that makes noise
Default

Originally Posted by DualPurposeXJ

Valid point but I wouldn't say they like weight its just unavoidable when building a cage to race specs. And I understand that rock crawlers don't need a full blown race legal cage. But you do want a properly designed cage with some triangulation.

Also another thing that should be mentioned is proper harness mounting. If your harness are not mounted correctly they will do more harm than good

Correct way to mount harnesses

Also once you cage your jeep it is important to ditch the stock seat belts and use harnesses.

Here's why, this picture is of a mild roll while heading back to camp.
WARNING: BLOOD
http://yfrog.com/1nla48f8a9d25084000951204j

I guess I should have mentioned why I didn't like C pillar landing on the wheel well. Im building my jeep to go fast and crawl so im mounting my shocks through the floor. And instead of hopping they clear my C pillar im just gonna move it. Also it will be a little peace of mind having the C pillar tied into the frame as I plan on having a 3rd seat in the back.
True proper triangulation I needed, but you can accomplish that with minimal weight and tube. My cage has survived multiple rolls as well as hard landings and a 40 mph roll and its very minimal.

And yes for desert racing the weight helps, our truck does better weighing at 8400lbs then it did around 6800lbs keeps your tires on the ground more for better traction.

Even building the two jeepspeed rigs compared to the various crawlers is two different worlds. Mine is kind of a happy medium, it works good for the go fast and crawling.

Last edited by jmaxj; 03-03-2012 at 02:24 PM.
Old 03-03-2012, 07:18 PM
  #13  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
builtnotbought89''s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 6,328
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1989 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Derek you every gonna post up pics of your junk?
Old 03-03-2012, 07:42 PM
  #14  
CF Veteran
 
jmaxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utardiland
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: whats left of a 91
Model: Cherokee
Engine: one that makes noise
Default

I don't think anyone here is into gay ****


But I guess I can post pics of my offroad dumpster when I get home
Old 03-03-2012, 09:50 PM
  #15  
Member
 
DualPurposeXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Menifee, CA
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by jmaxj
True proper triangulation I needed, but you can accomplish that with minimal weight and tube. My cage has survived multiple rolls as well as hard landings and a 40 mph roll and its very minimal.

And yes for desert racing the weight helps, our truck does better weighing at 8400lbs then it did around 6800lbs keeps your tires on the ground more for better traction.

Even building the two jeepspeed rigs compared to the various crawlers is two different worlds. Mine is kind of a happy medium, it works good for the go fast and crawling.
Interesting I've always tried to lighten my trucks but it makes sense.

Originally Posted by builtnotbought89'
Derek you every gonna post up pics of your junk?
^^^ this. I was just gonna ask you to post pics of your cage.


Quick Reply: TOTM roll cages



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 AM.